+5.1 ptsvs 78.9 average · 2,022 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
623 of 2,022tied with 87 others
Score vs region
+0.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
653 of 1,303tied with 43 others
Score vs county
±0.0 ptsvs 84 average · 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County
Fort Bend County placement
82 of 140tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+0.8 ptsvs 83.2 average · 1,616 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
816 of 1,616tied with 64 others
Score vs state
+2.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,325 of 7,646tied with 275 others
B84
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.9 average for 2,022 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is level with the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County.The current score is above the 83.2 average for 1,616 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
54%vs 45.6% avg · +8.4 pts
Masters
28%vs 18.2% avg · +9.8 pts
Among 1,892 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
David Crockett MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.9 average for 2,022 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 623rd of 2,022 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 87 others).
David Crockett MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 653rd of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 43 others).
David Crockett MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 82nd of 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County (tied with 2 others).
David Crockett MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.2 average for 1,616 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 816th of 1,616 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 64 others).
David Crockett MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,022 rated schools reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
4.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,022 rated schools reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement84 B+8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,892 reporting
School Progress90 A+9.9 vs similar economic context · 1,885 reporting
Closing the Gaps71 C−5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,874 reporting
Academic Growth76 C+2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,830 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,885 reporting
David Crockett MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,022 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
84
B
6
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
71
C
9
Academic Growth
76
C
4
Relative Performance
90
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 9 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so
Student Achievement (84) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level78%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
Meets grade level54%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
Masters grade level28%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Meets grade level64%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Masters grade level37%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Meets grade level44%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Masters grade level19%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
Meets grade level68%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
Masters grade level37%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level65%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 reporting
Meets grade level41%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 reporting
Masters grade level18%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,022 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,218
Economically disadvantaged
71.2%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.1%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.0%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.3%−5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
David Crockett MS
African American 42.7%
Hispanic 29.3%
White 5.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 19%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,022 reporting for every category shown · 2,022 in full cohort
African American 12.5%
Hispanic 57.8%
White 23.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
African American 26.7%
Hispanic 34.3%
White 15.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 19%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,616 reporting for every category shown · 1,616 in full cohort
African American 12.9%
Hispanic 50.5%
White 24.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,218
Economically disadvantaged students
867
Emergent bilingual students
233
Special education students
195
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
165
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,366
TEA-published mobility rate
12.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,218 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 50 (3.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,218
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−50
Decrease · −3.9%
Change since 2021–22
+88
Increase · +7.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,218
Selected comparison
630.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for David Crockett MS
School year
Students enrolledDavid Crockett MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,130
First available year
643.1
2022–23
1,119
Decrease of 11 (1.0%)
649.1
2023–24
1,284
Increase of 165 (14.7%)
647.4
2024–25
1,268
Decrease of 16 (1.2%)
645.8
2025–26
1,218
Decrease of 50 (3.9%)
630.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
279
20.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
665
48.90 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,360
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
20.5%
Selected comparison
13.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,547 rated schools reporting
+7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
48.9
Selected comparison
30.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,657 rated schools reporting
+18.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for David Crockett MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,144
51
4.5%
109
9.53
9.5%
18.9
2021–22
1,226
206
16.8%
447
36.46
13.0%
30.6
2022–23
1,201
155
12.9%
374
31.14
13.5%
32.6
2023–24
1,365
185
13.6%
454
33.26
13.3%
32.4
2024–25
1,360
279
20.5%
665
48.90
13.0%
30.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for David Crockett MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
279
20.5%
665
48.90
13.0%
30.8
In-school suspensions
221
16.3%
426
31.32
11.6%
23.2
Out-of-school suspensions
138
10.2%
220
16.18
7.4%
11.1
DAEP placements
11
0.8%
11
0.81
5.2%
6.3
Mandatory DAEP placements
11
0.8%
11
0.81
3.7%
4.2
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
David Crockett MS
Parent district: Fort Bend ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,409
Selected comparison
$13,137
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 rated schools reporting
−$3,728 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,409 per student for this campus, $18,181 per student for its parent district, Fort Bend ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
David Crockett MS
Parent district: Fort Bend ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,531
$14,055
$13,054
$8,034
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,871 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,380
$13,701
$13,108
$8,192
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,994
$15,136
$14,058
$8,735
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,910 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,682
$15,034
$14,797
$9,249
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,923 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,288
$15,054
$15,708
$10,505
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,812
$13,283
$16,792
$11,211
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,967 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,542
$14,142
$18,125
$12,410
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,988 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,409
$18,181
$18,972
$13,137
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,128+$710 vs similar economic context
Teachers
73+30.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.7+2.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
David Crockett MS
Beginning 7.8%
1 to 5 years 23%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 33.4%
21 to 30 years 13.8%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,022 reporting for every category shown · 2,022 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.4%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 23.9%
6 to 10 years 21.9%
11 to 20 years 30.1%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,616 reporting for every category shown · 1,616 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.2%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for David Crockett MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classDavid Crockett MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
21.9
17.9
Secondary English
20.2
15.3
Secondary languages other than English
18.9
17.9
Secondary math
19
16.2
Secondary science
23.9
17.6
Secondary social studies
23.8
17.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
84of 1,890
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,890 that report this measure · tied with 10
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 079907053.