Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
17.2% −2.9 pts vs 20.1%
- 17.2% is 2.9 percentage points lower than the 20.1% average among 2,031 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Darrouzett Schools
Lipscomb County · Region 16: Amarillo · 97 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 67/1002025-26
- Change
- −6 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −10.9 ptsvs 77.9 average · 2,115 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,790 of 2,115tied with 46 others
- Score vs region
- −14.8 ptsvs 81.8 average · 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo
- Region 16: Amarillo placement
- 186 of 208tied with 2 others
- Score vs county
- −9.8 ptsvs 76.8 average · 4 rated schools in Lipscomb County
- Score vs similar-size group
- −15.0 ptsvs 82 average · 374 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 339 of 374tied with 2 others
- Score vs state
- −14.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 6,919 of 7,646tied with 93 others
D67
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.9 average for 2,115 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo.The current score is below the 76.8 average for 4 rated schools in Lipscomb County.The current score is below the 82 average for 374 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Top placement
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
33.3% Tied for 1st of 65 schools in Region 16: Amarillo reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureNo academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Lipscomb County.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
17.2% −3.9 pts vs 21.1%
- 17.2% is 3.9 percentage points lower than the 21.1% average among 341 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
93.8% +1.3 pts vs 92.5%
- 93.8% is 1.3 percentage points above the 92.5% average among 341 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Texas average.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Darrouzett Schools is rated D by TEA, scoring 67 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.9 average for 2,115 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,790th of 2,115 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 46 others).
Darrouzett Schools is rated D by TEA, scoring 67 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 186th of 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo (tied with 2 others).
Darrouzett Schools is rated D by TEA, scoring 67 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 76.8 average for 4 rated schools in Lipscomb County. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Darrouzett Schools is rated D by TEA, scoring 67 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82 average for 374 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 339th of 374 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 2 others).
Darrouzett Schools is rated D by TEA, scoring 67 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6,919th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 93 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- Official improvement and transfer notices
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
Official improvement and transfer notices
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
2026 federal improvement status
Comprehensive Support and Improvement
Official support label: Comprehensive Identified
Identification reason: CSI Low Performance
TEA track year 3 · Title I campus
Schools identified for improvement
- This school
- Listed
- Selected comparison
- 33.3%
Schools on the PEG list
- This school
- Not listed
- Selected comparison
- 6.2%
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | D | 67 | 77.9 2,115 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 75 | 77.5 2,104 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | F | 58 | 75.1 2,089 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 73 | 75.6 2,072 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | C | 73 | 81.6 2,054 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Darrouzett Schools
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,115 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 71 | C | 9 |
| School Progress | 69 | D | 1 |
| Closing the Gaps | 59 | F | 1 |
| Academic Growth | 56 | F | 4 |
| Relative Performance | 69 | D | 1 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (71), so School Progress (69) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 71.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,115 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+7.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 334 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 100.0%+7.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 334 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 0.0% | 58.0% | −58.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 0.0% | 23.7% | −23.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 11.8% | −11.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 33.3% | 30.2% | +3.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 66.7% | 36.3% | +30.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 2.4% | −2.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 7.0% | −7.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 5.3% | −5.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 3.3% | −3.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 33.3% | 8.1% | +25.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.0% | 2.9% | −2.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 97
- Economically disadvantaged
- 78.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 28.9%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 12.4%−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 93.8%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 17.2%−2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Darrouzett Schools
- Hispanic 57.7%
- White 38.1%
- American Indian 2.1%
- Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,115 reporting for every category shown · 2,115 in full cohort
- African American 13.9%
- Hispanic 65.9%
- White 15.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
- African American 4.1%
- Hispanic 49.5%
- White 41.7%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 1.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison average For Lipscomb County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
- Hispanic 62.1%
- White 33.8%
- American Indian 0.8%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 374 reporting for every category shown · 374 in full cohort
- African American 6.6%
- Hispanic 46.6%
- White 43%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 97
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 76
- Emergent bilingual students
- 28
- Special education students
- 12
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 20
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 89
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 22.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 97 students in 2025–26, an increase of 11 (12.8%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 97
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +11
Increase · +12.8%
- Change since 2021–22
- −53
Decrease · −35.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 97
- Selected comparison
- 635
| School year | Students enrolledDarrouzett Schools | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 150 | First available year | 656.9 |
| 2022–23 | 112 | Decrease of 38 (25.3%) | 660.9 |
| 2023–24 | 104 | Decrease of 8 (7.1%) | 655.9 |
| 2024–25 | 86 | Decrease of 18 (17.3%) | 653.1 |
| 2025–26 | 97 | Increase of 11 (12.8%) | 635 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- 10
10.00 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 100
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 10
- Selected comparison
- 32.5
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 161 | 16 | 9.9% | 21 | 13.04 | 8.7% | 17.3 |
| 2021–22 | 166 | 23 | 13.9% | 31 | 18.67 | 13.0% | 31.2 |
| 2022–23 | 116 | 15 | 12.9% | 24 | 20.69 | 13.8% | 34.2 |
| 2023–24 | 117 | 18 | 15.4% | 36 | 30.77 | 13.7% | 34 |
| 2024–25 | 100 | Suppressed | — | 10 | 10.00 | — | 32.5 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | 10 | 10.00 | — | 32.5 |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Darrouzett Schools
- Parent district: Darrouzett ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $32,923
- Selected comparison
- $13,014
For 2025, TEA reported $32,923 per student for this campus, $44,524 per student for its parent district, Darrouzett ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Darrouzett Schools | Parent district: Darrouzett ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $13,351 | $21,222 | $13,054 | $8,088 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,988 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $13,722 | $21,579 | $13,108 | $8,238 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,008 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $13,315 | $17,050 | $14,058 | $8,739 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $13,785 | $25,773 | $14,797 | $9,374 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $14,071 | $23,639 | $15,708 | $10,744 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $21,826 | $27,349 | $16,792 | $11,302 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,072 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $26,666 | $33,331 | $18,125 | $12,305 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,089 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $32,923 | $44,524 | $18,972 | $13,014 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,103 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $63,272−$3,610 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 14−29.8 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 7.1−6.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Darrouzett Schools
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 44.5%
- 11 to 20 years 32.8%
- 21 to 30 years 10.2%
- Over 30 years 6.6%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,115 reporting for every category shown · 2,115 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 27.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 15.1%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 26.5%
- 6 to 10 years 18%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.2%
- Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison average For Lipscomb County · 4 reporting for every category shown · 4 in full cohort
- Beginning 8%
- 1 to 5 years 38.7%
- 6 to 10 years 11.1%
- 11 to 20 years 21.7%
- 21 to 30 years 12.4%
- Over 30 years 8.4%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 374 reporting for every category shown · 374 in full cohort
- Beginning 7%
- 1 to 5 years 22.7%
- 6 to 10 years 16.1%
- 11 to 20 years 26.3%
- 21 to 30 years 18.1%
- Over 30 years 7.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classDarrouzett Schools · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 4 | 18 |
| Grade 1 | 10 | 18.3 |
| Grade 2 | 3 | 18.4 |
| Grade 3 | 11 | 18.8 |
| Grade 4 | 8 | 19.1 |
| Grade 5 | 4 | 20.1 |
| Grade 6 | 10.3 | 17.9 |
| Secondary English | 5.5 | 15.4 |
| Secondary math | 5.7 | 16.5 |
| Secondary science | 6.4 | 17.8 |
| Secondary social studies | 5.9 | 17.9 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 152 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
-
1of 65
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 65 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
-
5of 207
Per-student spending
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 207 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 148905101.