Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
D D Hachar ElemA92vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
D D Hachar Elem
Webb County · Region 01: Edinburg · 421 students
Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+14.3 ptsvs 77.7 average · 1,639 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
55 of 1,639tied with 28 others
Score vs region
+6.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
63 of 505tied with 27 others
Score vs county
+3.7 ptsvs 88.3 average · 76 rated schools in Webb County
Webb County placement
17 of 76tied with 6 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,197 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
360 of 4,197tied with 139 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.7 average for 1,639 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,197 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
66%vs 40.4% avg · +25.6 pts
Masters
37%vs 16% avg · +21 pts
Among 1,524 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
D D Hachar Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.7 average for 1,639 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 55th of 1,639 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 28 others).
D D Hachar Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 63rd of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 27 others).
D D Hachar Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 76 rated schools in Webb County (tied with 6 others).
D D Hachar Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,197 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 360th of 4,197 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 139 others).
D D Hachar Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+20.9 vs similar economic context · 1,524 reporting
School Progress92 A+13.2 vs similar economic context · 1,521 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+16.9 vs similar economic context · 1,512 reporting
Academic Growth91 A+17.6 vs similar economic context · 1,500 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+15.2 vs similar economic context · 1,520 reporting
D D Hachar Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,639 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
91
A
—
Relative Performance
92
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (92), so
Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 reporting
Meets grade level66%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 reporting
Masters grade level37%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 reporting
Meets grade level64%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 reporting
Masters grade level32%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,521 reporting
Meets grade level67%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,521 reporting
Masters grade level35%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,521 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,441 reporting
Meets grade level71%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,441 reporting
Masters grade level54%+40 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,441 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,639 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
421
Economically disadvantaged
96.5%+3.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
57.8%+15.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.3%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%+2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.8%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
D D Hachar Elem
Hispanic 99.5%
White 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,639 reporting for every category shown · 1,639 in full cohort
African American 15.1%
Hispanic 77.4%
White 4.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 98.3%
White 1.3%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,197 reporting for every category shown · 4,197 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 26.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
405
Economically disadvantaged students
391
Emergent bilingual students
234
Special education students
74
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
42
Students in TEA mobility denominator
333
TEA-published mobility rate
12.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 421 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 22 (5.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
421
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−22
Decrease · −5.0%
Change since 2021–22
−18
Decrease · −4.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
421
Selected comparison
556.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for D D Hachar Elem
School year
Students enrolledD D Hachar Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
439
First available year
605.9
2022–23
442
Increase of 3 (0.7%)
602.2
2023–24
437
Decrease of 5 (1.1%)
591.6
2024–25
443
Increase of 6 (1.4%)
584.3
2025–26
421
Decrease of 22 (5.0%)
556.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
464
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for D D Hachar Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
520
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
475
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
457
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
463
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
464
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for D D Hachar Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
D D Hachar Elem
Parent district: Laredo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,088
Selected comparison
$13,433
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 rated schools reporting
−$2,345 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,088 per student for this campus, $17,272 per student for its parent district, Laredo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
D D Hachar Elem
Parent district: Laredo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,991
$12,618
$13,054
$8,391
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,548 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,522
$12,937
$13,108
$8,372
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,567 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,934
$13,776
$14,058
$8,878
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,570 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,695
$15,445
$14,797
$9,751
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,572 rated schools reporting
2022
$12,346
$19,935
$15,708
$11,246
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,588 rated schools reporting
2023
$11,100
$18,022
$16,792
$11,752
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,603 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,633
$18,312
$18,125
$12,817
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,610 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,088
$17,272
$18,972
$13,433
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,762−$859 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−9.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.5−1.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
D D Hachar Elem
1 to 5 years 3.3%
6 to 10 years 6.7%
11 to 20 years 40%
21 to 30 years 46.7%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,639 reporting for every category shown · 1,639 in full cohort
Beginning 7.8%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 18.6%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,197 reporting for every category shown · 4,197 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for D D Hachar Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classD D Hachar Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
22.6
18.1
Grade 1
20.1
18.3
Grade 2
15.5
18.2
Grade 3
21.8
18.4
Grade 4
16.9
18.3
Grade 5
19.2
19
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
7of 76
Science — Masters
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
14 measures
25of 1,524
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,524 that report this measure · tied with 4
27of 1,524
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,524 that report this measure · tied with 1
33of 1,524
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,524 that report this measure · tied with 5
38of 1,524
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,524 that report this measure · tied with 16
38of 1,521
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,521 that report this measure · tied with 5
39of 1,524
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,524 that report this measure · tied with 1
39of 1,521
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,521 that report this measure · tied with 7
39of 1,500
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,500 that report this measure · tied with 26
43of 1,441
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,441 that report this measure · tied with 2
45of 1,520
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,520 that report this measure · tied with 28
55of 1,639
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,639 that report this measure · tied with 28
63of 1,524
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,524 that report this measure · tied with 7
78of 1,441
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,441 that report this measure · tied with 12
83of 1,521
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,521 that report this measure · tied with 21
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240901119.