Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Cypress Park HS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 3,048 students

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.9 ptsvs 79.1 average · 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
495 of 2,025tied with 79 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 78 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.1 average for 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 9 points

77 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 9.8 points above the 76.2 average among 1,909 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
58%vs 46.3% avg · +11.7 pts
Masters
20%vs 18.6% avg · +1.4 pts

Among 1,909 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
72%vs 43.4% avg · +28.6 pts
Masters
37%vs 18.9% avg · +18.1 pts

Among 1,755 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Cypress Park HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.1 average for 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 495th of 2,025 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 79 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCypress Park HS 7974798586 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 78 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8679.1 2,025 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8579.0 2,005 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7976.8 1,989 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7477.3 1,960 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7982.0 1,941 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+9.8 vs similar economic context · 1,909 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+8.8 vs similar economic context · 1,902 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps80 B+3.6 vs similar economic context · 1,889 reporting
  • Academic Growth79 C+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,841 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+10.4 vs similar economic context · 1,902 reporting
  • Cypress Park HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,025 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps80B10
Academic Growth79C1
Relative Performance89B1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (89), so Student Achievement (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level83%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 894 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 894 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 894 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,025 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
96.1%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 431 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
97.2%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 431 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
94.8%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 429 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
88.0%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria88.0%87.4%+0.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 468 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course67.5%59.7%+7.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA19.4%26.6%−7.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)14.2%11.2%+3.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course28.1%33.3%−5.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification26.0%37.0%−11.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.1%−2.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree7.5%7.2%+0.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.1%4.2%−4.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness1.2%3.4%−2.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student3.1%8.4%−5.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces2.1%3.0%−0.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 472 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
704

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
254

36.1% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
339

48.2% of graduates

Not trackable
111

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
704
Selected comparison
245.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
254
Selected comparison
106.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
36.1%
Selected comparison
43.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

−7.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
48.2%
Selected comparison
50.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

−2.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
15.8%
Selected comparison
5.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

+10.1 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. LONE STAR COLLEGE - CY-FAIR (000717)101
  2. UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)20
  3. TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY (003615)18

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
3,048
Economically disadvantaged
69.5%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.8%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.7%−9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
89.7%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
32.0%+14.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Cypress Park HS

African American: 31.4%Hispanic: 54.8%White: 5.1%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 5.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • African American 31.4%
  • Hispanic 54.8%
  • White 5.1%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 5.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 reporting for every category shown · 2,025 in full cohort

African American: 12.3%Hispanic: 56.2%White: 25.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.5%
  • African American 12.3%
  • Hispanic 56.2%
  • White 25.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
3,048
Economically disadvantaged students
2,118
Emergent bilingual students
604
Special education students
295

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
448
Students in TEA mobility denominator
3,358
TEA-published mobility rate
13.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 3,048 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 69 (2.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
3,048

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−69

Decrease · −2.2%

Change since 2021–22
+143

Increase · +4.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
3,048
Selected comparison
638.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Cypress Park HS
School yearStudents enrolledCypress Park HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 2,905 First available year 651.1
2022–23 2,960 Increase of 55 (1.9%) 658.1
2023–24 3,051 Increase of 91 (3.1%) 656.8
2024–25 3,117 Increase of 66 (2.2%) 654.1
2025–26 3,048 Decrease of 69 (2.2%) 638.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
1,016

30.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
4,408

132.77 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
3,320

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
30.6%
Selected comparison
13.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,549 rated schools reporting

+17.6 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
132.77
Selected comparison
30.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,662 rated schools reporting

+102.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Cypress Park HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 2,839 152 5.3% 263 9.26 9.6% 19.2
2021–22 3,085 512 16.6% 1,719 55.72 12.9% 30.3
2022–23 3,132 735 23.5% 2,750 87.80 13.4% 32.3
2023–24 3,212 701 21.8% 2,668 83.06 13.3% 32.2
2024–25 3,320 1,016 30.6% 4,408 132.77 13.0% 30.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Cypress Park HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 1,016 30.6% 4,408 132.77 13.0% 30.8
In-school suspensions 929 28.0% 2,748 82.77 11.6% 23.4
Out-of-school suspensions 514 15.5% 1,340 40.36 7.4% 11.1
DAEP placements 255 7.7% 316 9.52 5.2% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements 219 6.6% 267 8.04 3.7% 4.3
Discretionary DAEP placements 46 1.4% 49 1.48 2.9% 3.4
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Cypress Park HS
  • Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,473
Selected comparison
$13,216

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,004 rated schools reporting

−$5,743 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,473 per student for this campus, $16,633 per student for its parent district, Cypress-Fairbanks ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCypress Park HSParent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,597$12,265$13,054$8,010 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 rated schools reporting
2019$7,415$12,730$13,108$8,168 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 rated schools reporting
2020$6,836$12,750$14,058$8,724 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2021$7,220$14,470$14,797$9,218 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,919 rated schools reporting
2022$7,127$15,507$15,708$10,477 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
2023$7,580$15,990$16,792$11,153 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 rated schools reporting
2024$7,940$16,047$18,125$12,419 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,988 rated schools reporting
2025$7,473$16,633$18,972$13,216 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,004 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,374+$6,922 vs similar economic context
Teachers
200+157.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.2+1.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Cypress Park HS

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 24.7%6 to 10 years: 30.8%11 to 20 years: 26.4%21 to 30 years: 10.3%Over 30 years: 2.6%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 30.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 26.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 10.3%
  • Over 30 years 2.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 reporting for every category shown · 2,025 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.4%1 to 5 years: 26.9%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.6%21 to 30 years: 15.5%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.5%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Cypress Park HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCypress Park HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English20.915.2
Secondary languages other than English23.717.9
Secondary math21.716.2
Secondary science2117.5
Secondary social studies23.317.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101907015.