Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Creekview MS

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 978 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Change
−13 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−4.7 ptsvs 82.7 average · 1,574 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,108 of 1,574tied with 45 others
C78

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82.7 average for 1,574 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
60%vs 54.1% avg · +5.9 pts
Masters
37%vs 26.5% avg · +10.5 pts

Among 1,408 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Creekview MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.7 average for 1,574 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,108th of 1,574 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 45 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCreekview MS 9191868678 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7882.7 1,574 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8683.1 1,543 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8681.1 1,515 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9181.6 1,499 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9184.0 1,479 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement81 B−1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,524 reporting
  • School Progress79 C−2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,520 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps72 C−8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,509 reporting
  • Academic Growth78 C+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,492 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C−0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,520 reporting
  • Creekview MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,574 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement81B9
School Progress79C1
Closing the Gaps72C8
Academic Growth78C2
Relative Performance79C1

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 8 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (81), so School Progress (79) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level73%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,524 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,522 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,522 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,522 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,517 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,517 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,517 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,408 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,408 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,408 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level55%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 795 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 795 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 795 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,574 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
978
Economically disadvantaged
46.4%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.6%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.0%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.6%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Creekview MS

African American: 19.2%Hispanic: 40.3%White: 29.3%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 19.2%
  • Hispanic 40.3%
  • White 29.3%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,574 reporting for every category shown · 1,574 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 38.9%White: 43.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 38.9%
  • White 43.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
978
Economically disadvantaged students
454
Emergent bilingual students
123
Special education students
196

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
102
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,025
TEA-published mobility rate
10%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 978 students in 2025–26, an increase of 16 (1.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
978

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+16

Increase · +1.7%

Change since 2021–22
+145

Increase · +17.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
978
Selected comparison
668.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,534 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Creekview MS
School yearStudents enrolledCreekview MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 833 First available year 665.9
2022–23 844 Increase of 11 (1.3%) 671.2
2023–24 881 Increase of 37 (4.4%) 671.5
2024–25 962 Increase of 81 (9.2%) 668.5
2025–26 978 Increase of 16 (1.7%) 668.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
290

28.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
929

91.35 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,017

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
28.5%
Selected comparison
11.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,221 rated schools reporting

+16.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
91.35
Selected comparison
25.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,310 rated schools reporting

+65.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Creekview MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 862 69 8.0% 98 11.37 9.5% 18
2021–22 886 123 13.9% 216 24.38 11.6% 25.1
2022–23 902 143 15.8% 256 28.38 12.0% 26.6
2023–24 948 179 18.9% 457 48.21 12.0% 27.3
2024–25 1,017 290 28.5% 929 91.35 11.7% 25.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Creekview MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 290 28.5% 929 91.35 11.7% 25.6
In-school suspensions 280 27.5% 812 79.84 10.5% 19.7
Out-of-school suspensions 79 7.8% 102 10.03 5.8% 8.1
DAEP placements 15 1.5% 15 1.47 4.2% 5
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$15k$25k20182020202220242025
  • Creekview MS
  • Parent district: Eagle Mt-Saginaw ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,990
Selected comparison
$11,930

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 rated schools reporting

−$3,940 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,990 per student for this campus, $19,796 per student for its parent district, Eagle Mt-Saginaw ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCreekview MSParent district: Eagle Mt-Saginaw ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,024$12,652$13,054$7,824 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,419 rated schools reporting
2019$6,708$14,289$13,108$8,009 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,438 rated schools reporting
2020$7,511$14,800$14,058$8,481 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,450 rated schools reporting
2021$8,371$17,418$14,797$8,898 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,469 rated schools reporting
2022$8,039$17,856$15,708$10,162 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,482 rated schools reporting
2023$8,615$23,355$16,792$10,605 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,499 rated schools reporting
2024$11,006$20,348$18,125$11,547 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,515 rated schools reporting
2025$7,990$19,796$18,972$11,930 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,537+$3,431 vs similar economic context
Teachers
50+6.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
19.6−0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Creekview MS

1 to 5 years: 18.1%6 to 10 years: 26.1%11 to 20 years: 30.7%21 to 30 years: 21.1%Over 30 years: 4%
  • 1 to 5 years 18.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 26.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 21.1%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,574 reporting for every category shown · 1,574 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.5%1 to 5 years: 24%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 29.9%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 5.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 24%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Creekview MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCreekview MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 627.917.8
Secondary English28.415.3
Secondary languages other than English29.317.7
Secondary math25.216.3
Secondary science3017.7
Secondary social studies28.417.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220918043.