Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Community Services-Sec

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 109 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
50/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−28.3 ptsvs 78.3 average · 2,080 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2,069 of 2,080tied with 2 others
F50

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is below the 78.3 average for 2,080 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Community Services-Sec is rated F by TEA, scoring 50 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.3 average for 2,080 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 2,069th of 2,080 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Graduation Rate

TEA track year 1

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
32.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,080 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
5.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,080 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 4350 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26F5078.3 2,080 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—77.8 2,066 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—75.6 2,053 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—76.1 2,029 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22F4381.7 2,013 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement50 F−24.1 vs similar economic context · 1,933 reporting
  • School Progress53 F−26.5 vs similar economic context · 1,927 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps43 F−32.6 vs similar economic context · 1,912 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.6 · 1,871 reporting
  • Relative Performance53 F−24.8 vs similar economic context · 1,927 reporting
  • Community Services-Sec
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,080 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement50F10
School Progress53F7
Closing the Gaps43F17
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance53F7

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (53), so Student Achievement (50) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 53.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level62%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting
  • Meets grade level10%−34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,933 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting
  • Meets grade level21%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level63%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,922 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,922 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,922 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,777 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−40 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,777 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,777 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 69.7% · 840 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 41.3% · 840 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 18% · 840 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,080 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−93.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 375 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
1.5%−91.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
55.3%+54.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
109
Economically disadvantaged
75.2%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
34.9%+10.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.8%−16.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
89.4%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
34.2%+15.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Community Services-Sec

African American: 24.8%Hispanic: 52.3%White: 16.5%Asian: 3.7%Two or More Races: 2.8%
  • African American 24.8%
  • Hispanic 52.3%
  • White 16.5%
  • Asian 3.7%
  • Two or More Races 2.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,080 reporting for every category shown · 2,080 in full cohort

African American: 13.3%Hispanic: 62.2%White: 19.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.1%
  • African American 13.3%
  • Hispanic 62.2%
  • White 19.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
109
Economically disadvantaged students
82
Emergent bilingual students
38
Special education students
3

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
619
Students in TEA mobility denominator
622
TEA-published mobility rate
99.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 109 students in 2025–26, an increase of 26 (31.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
109

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+26

Increase · +31.3%

Change since 2021–22
+25

Increase · +29.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
109
Selected comparison
640.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,050 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Community Services-Sec
School yearStudents enrolledCommunity Services-SecChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 84 First available year 658.5
2022–23 90 Increase of 6 (7.1%) 662.4
2023–24 107 Increase of 17 (18.9%) 659.5
2024–25 83 Decrease of 24 (22.4%) 656.7
2025–26 109 Increase of 26 (31.3%) 640.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
594

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Community Services-Sec
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 427 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 421 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 510 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 518 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 594 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Community Services-Sec in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$51k$95k20182020202220242025
  • Community Services-Sec
  • Parent district: Houston ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$70,687
Selected comparison
$13,068

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,064 rated schools reporting

+$57,619 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $70,687 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCommunity Services-SecParent district: Houston ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$55,071$14,470$13,054$8,055 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 rated schools reporting
2019$30,650$13,643$13,108$8,187 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 rated schools reporting
2020$36,435$13,627$14,058$8,738 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
2021$90,787$13,515$14,797$9,302 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,994 rated schools reporting
2022$70,790$14,985$15,708$10,599 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,013 rated schools reporting
2023$69,186$16,350$16,792$11,179 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,029 rated schools reporting
2024$48,785$18,150$18,125$12,309 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,051 rated schools reporting
2025$70,687$17,026$18,972$13,068 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,064 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$78,915+$12,242 vs similar economic context
Teachers
41−2.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
2.6−11.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Community Services-Sec

Beginning: 9.7%1 to 5 years: 14.5%6 to 10 years: 14.5%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 12.1%
  • Beginning 9.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 14.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 14.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 12.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,080 reporting for every category shown · 2,080 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15.2%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Community Services-Sec in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCommunity Services-Sec · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1.517.9
Grade 1118.2
Grade 21.318.3
Grade 3118.7
Grade 41.719
Grade 51.220
Grade 6117.9
Secondary English1.915.4
Secondary math1.416.4
Secondary science1.317.7
Secondary social studies2.217.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 906

    Per-student spending

    Harris County · of the 906 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912013.