Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Colorado River Collegiate Academy

Bastrop County · Region 13: Austin · 210 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
98/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+14.3 ptsvs 83.7 average · 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
6 of 1,439tied with 8 others
A98

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 99 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.7 average for 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Top placement

Earned college credit for a dual credit course

100% Tied for 1st of 406 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 8 share this value

See the full measure

Top placement

Social Studies — Masters

76% Tied for 2nd of 724 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Colorado River Collegiate Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.7 average for 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 6th of 1,439 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 8 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageColorado River Collegiate Academy 9898989898 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 99 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9883.7 1,439 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9884.0 1,409 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9882.2 1,387 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9882.8 1,372 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9884.8 1,352 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement98 A+14.0 vs similar economic context · 1,398 reporting
  • School Progress97 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 1,395 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps98 A+17.0 vs similar economic context · 1,386 reporting
  • Academic Growth74 C−3.3 vs similar economic context · 1,371 reporting
  • Relative Performance97 A+17.5 vs similar economic context · 1,395 reporting
  • Colorado River Collegiate Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,439 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement98A—
School Progress97A—
Closing the Gaps98A—
Academic Growth74C6
Relative Performance97A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (98), so School Progress (97) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 98.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level96%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
  • Meets grade level89%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
  • Masters grade level46%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
  • Meets grade level92%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
  • Meets grade level95%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
  • Masters grade level70%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,300 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
  • Meets grade level98%+44 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
  • Masters grade level76%+50 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 724 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,439 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+7.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 398 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 397 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+11.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%88.3%+11.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course95.2%59.8%+35.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA95.2%32.7%+62.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)66.7%12.8%+53.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course100.0%35.7%+64.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%37.5%−37.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.4%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree78.6%4.1%+74.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.9%−5.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%7.3%−7.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces9.5%3.3%+6.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
56

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
33

58.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
22

39.3% of graduates

Not trackable
1

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
56
Selected comparison
235.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
33
Selected comparison
104.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
58.9%
Selected comparison
47.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

+11.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
39.3%
Selected comparison
47.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

−8.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
1.8%
Selected comparison
4.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

−2.9 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE (012015)7
  2. SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY (003606)7
  3. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY (003644)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
210
Economically disadvantaged
42.4%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.9%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
1.9%−16.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.0%−3.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Colorado River Collegiate Academy

African American: 1%Hispanic: 62.9%White: 30%Asian: 1.4%Two or More Races: 4.8%
  • African American 1%
  • Hispanic 62.9%
  • White 30%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Two or More Races 4.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 reporting for every category shown · 1,439 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 36.8%White: 44.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 36.8%
  • White 44.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
210
Economically disadvantaged students
89
Emergent bilingual students
27
Special education students
4

Early college pathways

Early College High School
210

TEA-published share: 100%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
22
Students in TEA mobility denominator
202
TEA-published mobility rate
10.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 210 students in 2025–26, an increase of 20 (10.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
210

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+20

Increase · +10.5%

Change since 2021–22
−31

Decrease · −12.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
210
Selected comparison
699.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,406 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Colorado River Collegiate Academy
School yearStudents enrolledColorado River Collegiate AcademyChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 241 First available year 696.6
2022–23 236 Decrease of 5 (2.1%) 702.6
2023–24 222 Decrease of 14 (5.9%) 703.7
2024–25 190 Decrease of 32 (14.4%) 700.5
2025–26 210 Increase of 20 (10.5%) 699.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
191

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Colorado River Collegiate Academy
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 225 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 238 Suppressed — 10 4.20 — 24
2022–23 231 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 221 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 191 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Colorado River Collegiate Academy in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$16k$27k20182020202220242025
  • Colorado River Collegiate Academy
  • Parent district: Bastrop ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$15,123
Selected comparison
$11,999

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,410 rated schools reporting

+$3,124 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $15,123 per student for this campus, $25,556 per student for its parent district, Bastrop ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearColorado River Collegiate AcademyParent district: Bastrop ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,973$10,347$13,054$7,803 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,292 rated schools reporting
2019$6,228$10,786$13,108$8,014 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,312 rated schools reporting
2020$6,228$11,313$14,058$8,410 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 rated schools reporting
2021$6,033$12,465$14,797$8,809 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,341 rated schools reporting
2022$5,641$13,295$15,708$10,150 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,353 rated schools reporting
2023$7,315$20,192$16,792$10,580 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 rated schools reporting
2024$8,613$18,189$18,125$11,637 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,388 rated schools reporting
2025$15,123$25,556$18,972$11,999 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,410 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,609+$312 vs similar economic context
Teachers
14−31.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5−5.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Colorado River Collegiate Academy

Beginning: 7.4%1 to 5 years: 14.8%6 to 10 years: 37%11 to 20 years: 14.8%21 to 30 years: 11.1%Over 30 years: 14.8%
  • Beginning 7.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 14.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 37%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.1%
  • Over 30 years 14.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 reporting for every category shown · 1,439 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.4%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Colorado River Collegiate Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classColorado River Collegiate Academy · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English11.815.5
Secondary languages other than English11.818.1
Secondary math8.316.6
Secondary science10.418
Secondary social studies10.417.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

22 measures

  • 1of 406

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 406 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 1of 95

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Region 13: Austin · of the 95 that report this measure

  • 1of 32

    Overall score

    Bastrop County · of the 32 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    Student Achievement

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    School Progress

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    Closing the Gaps

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    Relative Performance

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    All Subjects — Meets

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    All Subjects — Masters

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    Reading — Approaches

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    Reading — Meets

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    Reading — Masters

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 31

    Math — Approaches

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 31

    Math — Meets

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure

  • 1of 29

    Attendance

    Bastrop County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 1of 29

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Bastrop County · of the 29 that report this measure

  • 1of 28

    Science — Meets

    Bastrop County · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 1of 28

    Science — Masters

    Bastrop County · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 1of 12

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Bastrop County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 1of 12

    Social Studies — Meets

    Bastrop County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 1of 12

    Social Studies — Masters

    Bastrop County · of the 12 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 2of 95

    Earned an associate degree

    Region 13: Austin · of the 95 that report this measure

  • 2of 28

    Science — Approaches

    Bastrop County · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 3of 95

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Region 13: Austin · of the 95 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 5of 95

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Region 13: Austin · of the 95 that report this measure

  • 5of 95

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Region 13: Austin · of the 95 that report this measure

  • 6of 31

    Math — Masters

    Bastrop County · of the 31 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 30

    Per-student spending

    Bastrop County · of the 30 that report this measure

  • 9of 29

    Academic Growth

    Bastrop County · of the 29 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 011901005.