Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0% −9.6 pts vs 9.6%
- 0% is 9.6 percentage points lower than the 9.6% average among 876 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Collin Co JJAEP
Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 4 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
Not Rated
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Collin Co JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
100% +4.6 pts vs 95.4%
- 100% is 4.6 percentage points above the 95.4% average among 876 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 10: Richardson average
0% −14.5 pts vs 14.5%
- 0% is 14.5 percentage points lower than the 14.5% average among 1,107 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Region 10: Richardson average
100% +5.5 pts vs 94.5%
- 100% is 5.5 percentage points above the 94.5% average among 1,107 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Collin County average
0% −10.4 pts vs 10.4%
- 0% is 10.4 percentage points lower than the 10.4% average among 285 schools in Collin County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Collin County average
100% +4.8 pts vs 95.2%
- 100% is 4.8 percentage points above the 95.2% average among 285 schools in Collin County reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against similarly sized schools.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
0% −16.7 pts vs 16.7%
- 0% is 16.7 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas average
100% +5.9 pts vs 94.1%
- 100% is 5.9 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 7,366 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Collin Co JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Collin Co JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Collin Co JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Collin Co JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Collin Co JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 88.5 891 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 88.5 882 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | Not Rated | — | 87.3 870 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | Not Rated | — | 87.5 854 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | Not Rated | — | 88.6 837 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Collin Co JJAEP
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (891 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (891 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 4
- Economically disadvantaged
- 25.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 25.0%+15.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 25.0%+7.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 100.0%+4.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 0.0%−9.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Collin Co JJAEP
- African American 50%
- Hispanic 50%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 891 reporting for every category shown · 891 in full cohort
- African American 8.5%
- Hispanic 27.5%
- White 48.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 10%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.1%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- African American 17.4%
- Hispanic 43.5%
- White 24.5%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 9.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
- African American 13.7%
- Hispanic 22.2%
- White 31.3%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 26.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 2 reporting for every category shown · 2 in full cohort
- Hispanic 66.7%
- White 33.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 4
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 1
- Emergent bilingual students
- 1
- Special education students
- 1
TEA context labels
- Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP)
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 9
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 9
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 100%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- Not reported
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | Not reported | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | Not reported | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043905003.