Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Clifton MS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 288 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
+19 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 1,332 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
228 of 1,332tied with 38 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 74 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 1,332 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 7 points

81 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 10.2 points above the 77.8 average among 1,332 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 15 points

69 to 84 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 84 is 7.3 points above the 76.7 average among 1,235 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
44%vs 39.2% avg · +4.8 pts
Masters
17%vs 15.2% avg · +1.8 pts

Among 1,236 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Clifton MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 1,332 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 19 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 228th of 1,332 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 38 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageClifton MS 6957658188 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 74 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8877.8 1,332 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8177.4 1,318 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6573.7 1,306 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23F5772.7 1,303 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6981.9 1,290 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C+2.0 vs similar economic context · 1,238 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,236 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+15.8 vs similar economic context · 1,229 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+13.3 vs similar economic context · 1,220 reporting
  • Relative Performance84 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,235 reporting
  • Clifton MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,332 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance84B6

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level67%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,238 reporting
  • Meets grade level39%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,238 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,238 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,238 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,238 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,238 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,236 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,236 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,236 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level65%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,175 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,175 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,175 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level37%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting
  • Meets grade level13%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,332 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
288
Economically disadvantaged
99.0%+4.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
55.2%+10.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.6%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.0%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
20.3%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Clifton MS

African American: 11.8%Hispanic: 78.8%White: 5.6%American Indian: 0.7%Asian: 2.1%Two or More Races: 1%
  • African American 11.8%
  • Hispanic 78.8%
  • White 5.6%
  • American Indian 0.7%
  • Asian 2.1%
  • Two or More Races 1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,332 reporting for every category shown · 1,332 in full cohort

African American: 15.2%Hispanic: 77.8%White: 4.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 15.2%
  • Hispanic 77.8%
  • White 4.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
288
Economically disadvantaged students
285
Emergent bilingual students
159
Special education students
45

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
155
Students in TEA mobility denominator
465
TEA-published mobility rate
33.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 288 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 75 (20.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
288

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−75

Decrease · −20.7%

Change since 2021–22
−267

Decrease · −48.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
288
Selected comparison
545.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,318 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Clifton MS
School yearStudents enrolledClifton MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 555 First available year 596.8
2022–23 509 Decrease of 46 (8.3%) 590.4
2023–24 419 Decrease of 90 (17.7%) 580.5
2024–25 363 Decrease of 56 (13.4%) 574
2025–26 288 Decrease of 75 (20.7%) 545.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
79

17.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
151

33.86 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
446

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
17.7%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 725 rated schools reporting

+4.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
33.86
Selected comparison
31.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 786 rated schools reporting

+2.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Clifton MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 620 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 649 40 6.2% 73 11.25 13.0% 30.8
2022–23 586 133 22.7% 328 55.97 13.8% 32.8
2023–24 506 117 23.1% 271 53.56 14.0% 33.4
2024–25 446 79 17.7% 151 33.86 13.2% 31.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Clifton MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 79 17.7% 151 33.86 13.2% 31.3
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 76 17.0% 126 28.25 9.9% 16.5
DAEP placements 23 5.2% 25 5.61 5.1% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Clifton MS
  • Parent district: Houston ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,982
Selected comparison
$13,566

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,317 rated schools reporting

+$1,416 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,982 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearClifton MSParent district: Houston ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,377$14,470$13,054$8,433 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,260 rated schools reporting
2019$7,022$13,643$13,108$8,382 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,275 rated schools reporting
2020$7,737$13,627$14,058$8,899 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,278 rated schools reporting
2021$8,539$13,515$14,797$9,786 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,278 rated schools reporting
2022$8,960$14,985$15,708$11,312 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,290 rated schools reporting
2023$10,020$16,350$16,792$11,861 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,303 rated schools reporting
2024$13,115$18,150$18,125$12,897 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,309 rated schools reporting
2025$14,982$17,026$18,972$13,566 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,317 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$84,695+$15,882 vs similar economic context
Teachers
18−20.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16+1.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Clifton MS

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 38.9%6 to 10 years: 27.8%11 to 20 years: 27.8%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 38.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,332 reporting for every category shown · 1,332 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.8%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 18.5%11 to 20 years: 26.9%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 26.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Clifton MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classClifton MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 618.317.2
Secondary English18.814.9
Secondary math17.516.8
Secondary science20.717.5
Secondary social studies20.717.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912048.