+8.2 ptsvs 86.8 average · 1,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
59 of 1,083tied with 29 others
Score vs region
+11.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
58 of 1,303tied with 27 others
Score vs county
+11.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 105 rated schools in Galveston County
Galveston County placement
4 of 105tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+7.9 ptsvs 87.1 average · 480 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
18 of 480tied with 15 others
Score vs state
+13.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
247 of 7,646tied with 131 others
A95
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86.8 average for 1,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 105 rated schools in Galveston County.The current score is above the 87.1 average for 480 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
74%vs 63.4% avg · +10.6 pts
Masters
33%vs 31.3% avg · +1.7 pts
Among 1,058 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Clear Lake HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.8 average for 1,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 59th of 1,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 29 others).
Clear Lake HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 58th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 27 others).
Clear Lake HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 105 rated schools in Galveston County. It is up 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 105 rated schools in Galveston County (tied with 1 other).
Clear Lake HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.1 average for 480 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 18th of 480 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 15 others).
Clear Lake HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 12 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement95 A+7.5 vs similar economic context · 1,058 reporting
School Progress94 A+10.0 vs similar economic context · 1,055 reporting
Closing the Gaps96 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,047 reporting
Academic Growth84 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 1,037 reporting
Relative Performance94 A+14.0 vs similar economic context · 1,055 reporting
Clear Lake HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,083 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
95
A
—
School Progress
94
A
—
Closing the Gaps
96
A
—
Academic Growth
84
B
6
Relative Performance
94
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so
School Progress (94) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level90%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting
Meets grade level74%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting
Masters grade level33%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,057 reporting
Meets grade level69%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,057 reporting
Masters grade level20%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,057 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,054 reporting
Meets grade level78%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,054 reporting
Masters grade level36%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,054 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 reporting
Meets grade level74%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 reporting
Masters grade level35%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 548 reporting
Meets grade level82%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 548 reporting
Masters grade level58%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 548 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,083 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
98.3%+6.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.8%+7.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
99.5%+8.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.2%−0.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%+9.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%
89.0%
+9.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
91.7%
63.1%
+28.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
47.8%
41.6%
+6.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
40.5%
19.3%
+21.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
18.7%
38.3%
−19.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
8.7%
35.8%
−27.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.8%
−0.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
4.5%
−4.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
7.0%
6.3%
+0.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
4.0%
2.6%
+1.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
6.0%
7.0%
−1.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
2.8%
3.1%
−0.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
594
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
306
51.5% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
240
40.4% of graduates
Not trackable
48
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
594
Selected comparison
289.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
306
Selected comparison
139.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
51.5%
Selected comparison
49.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 rated schools reporting
+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
40.4%
Selected comparison
44.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 rated schools reporting
−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
8.1%
Selected comparison
6.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 rated schools reporting
+2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
SAN JACINTO COLLEGE (029137)110
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)42
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)22
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
2,463
Economically disadvantaged
31.8%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.7%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.3%−6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.0%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.3%+7.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Clear Lake HS
African American 7%
Hispanic 37.6%
White 39.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 10.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,083 reporting for every category shown · 1,083 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 30.6%
White 48%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Galveston County · 105 reporting for every category shown · 105 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 41.5%
White 35.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 480 reporting for every category shown · 480 in full cohort
African American 13.8%
Hispanic 52.1%
White 23.2%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 7.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
2,459
Economically disadvantaged students
781
Emergent bilingual students
262
Special education students
278
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
284
Students in TEA mobility denominator
2,657
TEA-published mobility rate
10.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 2,463 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 37 (1.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
2,463
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−37
Decrease · −1.5%
Change since 2021–22
−27
Decrease · −1.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
2,463
Selected comparison
785
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,069 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Clear Lake HS
School year
Students enrolledClear Lake HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
2,490
First available year
796.5
2022–23
2,533
Increase of 43 (1.7%)
799.9
2023–24
2,500
Decrease of 33 (1.3%)
796.8
2024–25
2,500
No change
793.7
2025–26
2,463
Decrease of 37 (1.5%)
785
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
513
19.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
1,510
57.63 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
2,620
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
19.6%
Selected comparison
9.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 rated schools reporting
+10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
57.63
Selected comparison
18.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 897 rated schools reporting
+38.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Clear Lake HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
2,543
246
9.7%
617
24.26
7.4%
13.4
2021–22
2,620
394
15.0%
1,091
41.64
9.7%
19.6
2022–23
2,644
449
17.0%
1,271
48.07
9.9%
20.3
2023–24
2,610
487
18.7%
1,523
58.35
9.5%
20.2
2024–25
2,620
513
19.6%
1,510
57.63
9.2%
18.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Clear Lake HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
513
19.6%
1,510
57.63
9.2%
18.9
In-school suspensions
473
18.1%
1,210
46.18
8.3%
14.7
Out-of-school suspensions
166
6.3%
204
7.79
4.5%
6.1
DAEP placements
81
3.1%
89
3.40
3.3%
3.8
Mandatory DAEP placements
57
2.2%
62
2.37
2.6%
3
Discretionary DAEP placements
26
1.0%
27
1.03
1.7%
1.9
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Clear Lake HS
Parent district: Clear Creek ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,550
Selected comparison
$11,771
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,062 rated schools reporting
−$2,221 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,550 per student for this campus, $15,801 per student for its parent district, Clear Creek ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Clear Lake HS
Parent district: Clear Creek ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,116
$12,387
$13,054
$7,644
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 957 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,309
$13,243
$13,108
$7,788
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 973 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,568
$13,080
$14,058
$8,119
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 983 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,332
$14,249
$14,797
$8,546
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 995 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,822
$13,350
$15,708
$9,819
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,015 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,741
$14,031
$16,792
$10,345
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,033 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,304
$14,786
$18,125
$11,444
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,046 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,550
$15,801
$18,972
$11,771
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,062 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$73,385+$5,203 vs similar economic context
Teachers
147+95.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.8+2.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Clear Lake HS
Beginning 3.3%
1 to 5 years 21%
6 to 10 years 24.7%
11 to 20 years 31.6%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,083 reporting for every category shown · 1,083 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 22.4%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 32.2%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Galveston County · 105 reporting for every category shown · 105 in full cohort
Beginning 3.7%
1 to 5 years 22.4%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 14%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 480 reporting for every category shown · 480 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 24.7%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Clear Lake HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classClear Lake HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
16.5
16.5
Secondary languages other than English
21.4
18.6
Secondary math
15.7
17.3
Secondary science
16.1
18.8
Secondary social studies
17.9
18.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 38
Social Studies — Masters
Galveston County · of the 38 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
7 measures
2of 93
Relative Performance
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 93
Math — Approaches
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 17
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Galveston County · of the 17 that report this measure
3of 93
Math — Meets
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 92
Closing the Gaps
Galveston County · of the 92 that report this measure
3of 17
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Galveston County · of the 17 that report this measure
3of 17
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Galveston County · of the 17 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
18 measures
4of 105
Overall score
Galveston County · of the 105 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 93
Student Achievement
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 38
Social Studies — Meets
Galveston County · of the 38 that report this measure
4of 17
College, career or military ready
Galveston County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 38
Social Studies — Approaches
Galveston County · of the 38 that report this measure
6of 17
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Galveston County · of the 17 that report this measure
7of 79
Science — Approaches
Galveston County · of the 79 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 17
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Galveston County · of the 17 that report this measure
7of 14
Six-Year Graduation Rate
Galveston County (standard accountability only) · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 17
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Galveston County · of the 17 that report this measure
8of 17
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Galveston County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 14
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Galveston County (standard accountability only) · of the 14 that report this measure
9of 93
All Subjects — Approaches
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure
9of 93
All Subjects — Meets
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure
9of 93
Math — Masters
Galveston County · of the 93 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 17
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Galveston County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 79
Science — Meets
Galveston County · of the 79 that report this measure
10of 14
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Galveston County (standard accountability only) · of the 14 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
270of 7,238
School Progress
Texas average · of the 7,238 that report this measure · tied with 136 · full ranking
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 084910002.