txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

Claybon Elem

Kaufman County · Region 10: Richardson · 550 students

B80

Claybon Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.8 average of the 1,573 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 10 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 90.

Ranks 4,402nd of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 276 others), and 709th of 1,157 in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 25 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this school ranks best
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
908070 Schools like this oneTexas averageClaybon Elem 9077788380 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26B8082.881.3
2024-25B8383.281.2
2023-24C7881.178.9
2022-23C7781.779.1
2021-22A9084.183.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Claybon Elem itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement83 B+0.1 vs similar · +3.5 vs region
  • School Progress80 B−1.9 vs similar · −1.8 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps74 C−6.2 vs similar · −5.4 vs region
  • Academic Growth70 C−6.4 vs similar · −7.1 vs region
  • Relative Performance80 B+0.6 vs similar · +2.2 vs region
  • Claybon Elem
  • Similar student population (1,573)
  • Region 10: Richardson (1,157)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement83B7
School Progress80B10
Closing the Gaps74C6
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance80B10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (83), so School Progress (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level78%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level58%+3 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level30%+6 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level81%+1 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level63%+3 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level33%+7 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level75%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level52%+4 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level28%+8 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (1,573)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (1,573 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
550
Economically disadvantaged
46.0%−0.7 pts vs similar
English learners
8.5%−3.8 pts vs similar
Special education
25.8%+7.4 pts vs similar
Attendance
95.2%+0.5 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
9.9%−3.7 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 32.5%Hispanic: 22.9%White: 35.6%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 2.7%Two or More Races: 5.6%
  • African American 32.5%
  • Hispanic 22.9%
  • White 35.6%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 2.7%
  • Two or More Races 5.6%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$9k$21k$34k20182020202220242025
  • Claybon Elem
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary
$66,766−$328 vs similar
Teachers
41
Students per staff member
13.6

Teaching experience

Beginning: 4.9%1 to 5 years: 39.5%6 to 10 years: 15.1%11 to 20 years: 23%21 to 30 years: 17.3%
  • Beginning 4.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 39.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 23%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 76 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 6of 59

    All Subjects — Masters

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 6of 59

    Reading — Masters

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 7of 59

    Reading — Meets

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 59

    Math — Masters

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 10of 59

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 1of 61

    Per-student spending

    Kaufman County · of the 61 that report this measure · tied with 22

  • 8of 59

    Reading — Approaches

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 9of 59

    All Subjects — Meets

    Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 3

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 129902103.