STAAR result
Reading above Region 20: San Antonio averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 54%vs 52.5% avg · +1.5 pts
- Masters
- 24%vs 22.1% avg · +1.9 pts
Among 612 schools in Region 20: San Antonio reporting this measure.
See the full measureIndependent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.
Traditional public school campus
Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 774 students
At a glance
The current score is below the 81.9 average for 1,721 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is below the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County.The current score is below the 80.9 average for 3,892 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Similar economic-disadvantage rate.
STAAR result
Among 612 schools in Region 20: San Antonio reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 386 schools in Bexar County reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 380 schools in Bexar County reporting this measure.
See the full measureNo academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against similarly sized schools.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Texas average.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Cibolo Creek MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 73 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.9 average for 1,721 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 1,435th of 1,721 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 42 others).
Cibolo Creek MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 73 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 455th of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 20 others).
Cibolo Creek MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 73 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 268th of 401 rated schools in Bexar County (tied with 13 others).
Cibolo Creek MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 73 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.9 average for 3,892 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 3,012th of 3,892 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 95 others).
Cibolo Creek MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 73 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 6,052nd of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 160 others).
Put the numbers in context
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 73 | 81.9 1,721 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 73 | C | 7 |
| School Progress | 67 | D | 3 |
| Closing the Gaps | 72 | C | 8 |
| Academic Growth | 67 | D | 3 |
| Relative Performance | 63 | D | 7 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 7 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (73), so School Progress (67) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 73.
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Cibolo Creek MS
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,721 reporting for every category shown · 1,721 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,892 reporting for every category shown · 3,892 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Cibolo Creek MS
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,721 reporting for every category shown · 1,721 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,892 reporting for every category shown · 3,892 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015916046.