Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Chumbley Elem

Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 732 students

Current score
74/1002025-26
Change
−8 ptssince 2024-25
Score vs similar economic context
−10.3 ptsvs 84.3 average · 1,371 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,194 of 1,371tied with 36 others
C74

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 84.3 average for 1,371 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Similar economic-disadvantage rate.

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Chumbley Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 84.3 average for 1,371 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2024-25.

Ranks 1,194th of 1,371 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 36 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageChumbley Elem 8274 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7484.3 1,371 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8284.5 1,342 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement73 C−11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,331 reporting
  • School Progress71 C−11.5 vs similar economic context · 1,327 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps75 C−6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,317 reporting
  • Academic Growth71 C−6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,304 reporting
  • Relative Performance59 F−20.5 vs similar economic context · 1,327 reporting
  • Chumbley Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,371 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement73C7
School Progress71C9
Closing the Gaps75C5
Academic Growth71C9
Relative Performance59F1

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (73), so School Progress (71) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 73.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,331 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,331 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,331 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,330 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,330 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,330 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,325 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,325 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,325 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level51%−31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,230 reporting
  • Meets grade level15%−42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,230 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,230 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,371 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
732
Economically disadvantaged
40.2%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.8%−7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.6%+6.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.9%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Chumbley Elem

African American: 12.7%Hispanic: 59.1%White: 17.9%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 7.8%
  • African American 12.7%
  • Hispanic 59.1%
  • White 17.9%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 7.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,371 reporting for every category shown · 1,371 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 35.6%White: 45.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 35.6%
  • White 45.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
731
Economically disadvantaged students
294
Emergent bilingual students
28
Special education students
180

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
86
Students in TEA mobility denominator
476
TEA-published mobility rate
18.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 732 students in 2025–26, an increase of 192 (35.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
732

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+192

Increase · +35.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
732
Selected comparison
692

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,339 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Chumbley Elem
School yearStudents enrolledChumbley ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25 540 First available year 697
2025–26 732 Increase of 192 (35.6%) 692

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18

2.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
38

6.08 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
625

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.9%
Selected comparison
10.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,059 rated schools reporting

−7.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
6.08
Selected comparison
23.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,139 rated schools reporting

−17.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Chumbley Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 625 18 2.9% 38 6.08 10.7% 23.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Chumbley Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 18 2.9% 38 6.08 10.7% 23.2
In-school suspensions 18 2.9% 37 5.92 9.6% 17.9
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$11k$15k$20k2025
  • Chumbley Elem
  • Parent district: Northside ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,671
Selected comparison
$11,978

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,343 rated schools reporting

+$693 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,671 per student for this campus, $17,197 per student for its parent district, Northside ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearChumbley ElemParent district: Northside ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$12,671$17,197$18,972$11,978 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,343 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,205−$211 vs similar economic context
Teachers
49+2.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.1+1.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Chumbley Elem

Beginning: 4.1%1 to 5 years: 45.4%6 to 10 years: 20.6%11 to 20 years: 17.5%21 to 30 years: 12.4%
  • Beginning 4.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 45.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,371 reporting for every category shown · 1,371 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.3%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Chumbley Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classChumbley Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten17.818.1
Grade 120.218.7
Grade 222.818.9
Grade 322.219.6
Grade 420.819.3
Grade 519.720.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015915237.