Recent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
89 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 5.2 points above the 88.8 average among 872 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
China Spring HS
McLennan County · Region 12: Waco · 917 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 94/1002025-26
- Change
- +5 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +5.2 ptsvs 88.8 average · 872 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 85 of 872tied with 61 others
- Score vs region
- +15.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco
- Region 12: Waco placement
- 9 of 301tied with 5 others
- Score vs county
- +17.0 ptsvs 77 average · 83 rated schools in McLennan County
- McLennan County placement
- 3 of 83tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- +12.9 ptsvs 81.1 average · 3,068 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 104 of 3,068tied with 84 others
- Score vs state
- +12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 88.8 average for 872 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco.The current score is above the 77 average for 83 rated schools in McLennan County.The current score is above the 81.1 average for 3,068 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 7 points
81 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 2.8 points above the 85.2 average among 855 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 90%vs 65.5% avg · +24.5 pts
- Masters
- 51%vs 38.3% avg · +12.7 pts
Among 785 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
89 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 15.5 points above the 78.5 average among 301 schools in Region 12: Waco reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 7 points
81 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 9.4 points above the 78.6 average among 282 schools in Region 12: Waco reporting this measure.
Top placement
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
75.5% 2nd of 85 schools in Region 12: Waco reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
89 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 17 points above the 77 average among 83 schools in McLennan County reporting this measure.
- Tied for 3rd of 83 schools in McLennan County reporting this measure; 2 schools share that value.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 7 points
81 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 11.1 points above the 76.9 average among 75 schools in McLennan County reporting this measure.
Top placement
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
75.5% 1st of 18 schools in McLennan County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
89 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 12.9 points above the 81.1 average among 3,068 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 7 points
81 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 7.2 points above the 80.8 average among 3,019 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 77%vs 51.5% avg · +25.5 pts
- Masters
- 29%vs 25.2% avg · +3.8 pts
Among 3,019 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
89 to 94 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 94 is 12.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 7 points
81 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 6.8 points above the 81.2 average among 7,238 Texas schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 77%vs 50.8% avg · +26.2 pts
- Masters
- 29%vs 22.8% avg · +6.2 pts
Among 7,260 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
China Spring HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.8 average for 872 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 85th of 872 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 61 others).
China Spring HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco (tied with 5 others).
China Spring HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77 average for 83 rated schools in McLennan County. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 83 rated schools in McLennan County (tied with 1 other).
China Spring HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average for 3,068 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 104th of 3,068 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 84 others).
China Spring HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 379th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 208 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 94 | 88.8 872 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 89 | 88.7 865 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 90 | 87.5 849 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 86 | 87.8 834 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 89 | 88.9 819 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- China Spring HS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (872 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 94 | A | — |
| School Progress | 88 | B | 2 |
| Closing the Gaps | 94 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 82 | B | 8 |
| Relative Performance | 88 | B | 2 |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (872 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 99.6%+9.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 225 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+10.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 224 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 99.6%+10.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 225 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 226 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 92.0%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 92.0% | 89.3% | +2.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 221 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 75.5% | 66.8% | +8.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 75.5% | 47.9% | +27.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 16.9% | 24.9% | −8.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 35.9% | 38.8% | −2.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 24.9% | 31.9% | −7.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 0.5% | −0.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 4.5% | −4.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.4% | 7.3% | −6.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 2.4% | −2.4 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 7.2% | 6.4% | +0.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 4.2% | 2.7% | +1.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 217
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 124
57.1% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 93
42.9% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 0
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This school
- 217
- Selected comparison
- 348.5
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This school
- 124
- Selected comparison
- 169.3
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This school
- 57.1%
- Selected comparison
- 50.1%
Not-found rate
- This school
- 42.9%
- Selected comparison
- 42.0%
Not-trackable rate
- This school
- 0.0%
- Selected comparison
- 7.9%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- MCLENNAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE (003590)50
- TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY (003631)11
- BAYLOR UNIVERSITY (003545)10
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 917
- Economically disadvantaged
- 24.3%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 2.0%−8.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 8.3%−8.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.3%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 12.7%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
China Spring HS
- African American 7.1%
- Hispanic 23.9%
- White 61.2%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 2%
- Two or More Races 5.2%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 872 reporting for every category shown · 872 in full cohort
- African American 8.4%
- Hispanic 26.9%
- White 48.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 10.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
- African American 14.2%
- Hispanic 37.4%
- White 40.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.7%
- Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison average For McLennan County · 83 reporting for every category shown · 83 in full cohort
- African American 13.9%
- Hispanic 38.4%
- White 42.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,068 reporting for every category shown · 3,068 in full cohort
- African American 12.7%
- Hispanic 52.5%
- White 24.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 6.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 915
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 222
- Emergent bilingual students
- 18
- Special education students
- 76
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 86
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 998
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 8.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 917 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 42 (4.4%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 917
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −42
Decrease · −4.4%
- Change since 2021–22
- +19
Increase · +2.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 917
- Selected comparison
- 841.9
| School year | Students enrolledChina Spring HS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 898 | First available year | 857.9 |
| 2022–23 | 948 | Increase of 50 (5.6%) | 861.4 |
| 2023–24 | 941 | Decrease of 7 (0.7%) | 856.8 |
| 2024–25 | 959 | Increase of 18 (1.9%) | 851 |
| 2025–26 | 917 | Decrease of 42 (4.4%) | 841.9 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 93
9.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 191
19.25 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 992
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 9.4%
- Selected comparison
- 7.7%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 19.25
- Selected comparison
- 15
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 875 | 51 | 5.8% | 101 | 11.54 | 5.8% | 10 |
| 2021–22 | 939 | 114 | 12.1% | 216 | 23.00 | 7.9% | 15.7 |
| 2022–23 | 980 | 101 | 10.3% | 178 | 18.16 | 8.2% | 16.4 |
| 2023–24 | 954 | 90 | 9.4% | 193 | 20.23 | 7.8% | 15.8 |
| 2024–25 | 992 | 93 | 9.4% | 191 | 19.25 | 7.7% | 15 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 93 | 9.4% | 191 | 19.25 | 7.7% | 15 |
| In-school suspensions | 88 | 8.9% | 125 | 12.60 | 7.0% | 11.9 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | 51 | 5.1% | 57 | 5.75 | 2.7% | 3.1 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | 41 | 4.1% | 43 | 4.33 | 2.2% | 2.4 |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | 13 | 1.3% | 14 | 1.41 | 1.4% | 1.5 |
| JJAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- China Spring HS
- Parent district: China Spring ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $7,393
- Selected comparison
- $11,197
For 2025, TEA reported $7,393 per student for this campus, $13,436 per student for its parent district, China Spring ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | China Spring HS | Parent district: China Spring ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $7,006 | $10,013 | $13,054 | $7,545 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 771 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,638 | $10,650 | $13,108 | $7,609 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 784 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,119 | $10,186 | $14,058 | $7,947 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 795 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $7,089 | $11,934 | $14,797 | $8,502 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 802 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $7,425 | $23,528 | $15,708 | $9,479 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $6,930 | $18,666 | $16,792 | $10,129 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 835 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $7,279 | $14,392 | $18,125 | $11,135 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 849 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $7,393 | $13,436 | $18,972 | $11,197 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 864 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $63,462−$5,057 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 72+17.9 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 12.7−2.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
China Spring HS
- Beginning 6.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 29.2%
- 21 to 30 years 19.4%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 872 reporting for every category shown · 872 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.8%
- 1 to 5 years 22.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.7%
- 11 to 20 years 32.4%
- 21 to 30 years 17.2%
- Over 30 years 3.1%
Selected comparison average For Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.8%
- 1 to 5 years 26.8%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 16.2%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For McLennan County · 83 reporting for every category shown · 83 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.3%
- 1 to 5 years 26%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 4.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,068 reporting for every category shown · 3,068 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.3%
- 1 to 5 years 27%
- 6 to 10 years 20.3%
- 11 to 20 years 28.9%
- 21 to 30 years 14.7%
- Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classChina Spring HS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 16.7 | 17.4 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 20.6 | 19.6 |
| Secondary math | 20.6 | 18 |
| Secondary science | 21.1 | 19.7 |
| Secondary social studies | 23.6 | 19.8 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
3 measures
-
1of 2,832
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 2,832 that report this measure · tied with 14
-
1of 70
Science — Meets
McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure
-
1of 18
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
-
2of 75
Closing the Gaps
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
2of 75
All Subjects — Approaches
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
2of 18
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
-
3of 83
Overall score
McLennan County · of the 83 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
16 measures
-
4of 75
Student Achievement
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
4of 75
All Subjects — Meets
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure
-
4of 75
Math — Approaches
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
4of 18
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
-
4of 18
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
-
5of 70
Science — Masters
McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure
-
6of 75
Reading — Meets
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure
-
6of 18
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
-
7of 35
Social Studies — Meets
McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure
-
8of 75
Reading — Approaches
McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure
-
8of 18
Four-Year Graduation Rate
McLennan County (standard accountability only) · of the 18 that report this measure
-
8of 18
Six-Year Graduation Rate
McLennan County (standard accountability only) · of the 18 that report this measure
-
9of 35
Social Studies — Approaches
McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
9of 35
Social Studies — Masters
McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 18
College, career or military ready
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 18
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
McLennan County · of the 18 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 161920001.