+1.5 ptsvs 91.5 average · 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
160 of 513tied with 79 others
Score vs region
+10.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
109 of 1,157tied with 51 others
Score vs county
+6.6 ptsvs 86.4 average · 307 rated schools in Collin County
Collin County placement
44 of 307tied with 30 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.8 ptsvs 86.2 average · 633 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
81 of 633tied with 37 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.5 average for 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County.The current score is above the 86.2 average for 633 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
91%vs 75.9% avg · +15.1 pts
Masters
55%vs 46.3% avg · +8.7 pts
Among 504 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Centennial HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.5 average for 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 160th of 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 79 others).
Centennial HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 109th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 51 others).
Centennial HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 44th of 307 rated schools in Collin County (tied with 30 others).
Centennial HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.2 average for 633 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 81st of 633 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 37 others).
Centennial HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A−0.6 vs similar economic context · 504 reporting
School Progress86 B−1.7 vs similar economic context · 502 reporting
Closing the Gaps95 A+6.0 vs similar economic context · 499 reporting
Academic Growth74 C−12.2 vs similar economic context · 499 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+7.6 vs similar economic context · 502 reporting
Centennial HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (513 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
86
B
4
Closing the Gaps
95
A
—
Academic Growth
74
C
6
Relative Performance
86
B
4
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level97%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Meets grade level91%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Masters grade level55%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Meets grade level91%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Masters grade level38%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting
Meets grade level83%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting
Masters grade level51%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 reporting
Meets grade level94%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 reporting
Masters grade level70%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 reporting
Meets grade level96%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 reporting
Masters grade level76%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (513 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
99.6%+12.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 83 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.4%+13.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
98.2%+14.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.1%±0.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 83 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
85.0%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
85.0%
88.4%
−3.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
73.7%
69.3%
+4.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
73.2%
58.6%
+14.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
65.4%
39.2%
+26.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
28.6%
35.2%
−6.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
8.0%
26.4%
−18.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.3%
−0.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
0.4%
−0.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
10.5%
−10.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
1.8%
2.2%
−0.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
3.1%
5.7%
−2.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
1.4%
−1.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
477
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
202
42.3% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
179
37.5% of graduates
Not trackable
96
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
477
Selected comparison
432.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
202
Selected comparison
197.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
42.3%
Selected comparison
49.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting
−6.7 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
37.5%
Selected comparison
40.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting
−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
20.1%
Selected comparison
11.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting
+9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
COLLIN CO COMM COLL DISTRICT (023614)51
U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (003658)41
U. OF TEXAS AT DALLAS (009741)28
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,936
Economically disadvantaged
8.3%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.6%−7.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.4%−9.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.4%+5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Centennial HS
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 8.6%
White 25.6%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 55.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 513 reporting for every category shown · 513 in full cohort
African American 5%
Hispanic 18%
White 48.7%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 22%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
African American 13.7%
Hispanic 22.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 26.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 633 reporting for every category shown · 633 in full cohort
African American 13.3%
Hispanic 51.4%
White 23.9%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 7.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,936
Economically disadvantaged students
161
Emergent bilingual students
69
Special education students
123
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
88
Students in TEA mobility denominator
2,069
TEA-published mobility rate
4.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,936 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 82 (4.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,936
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−82
Decrease · −4.1%
Change since 2021–22
−133
Decrease · −6.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,936
Selected comparison
864.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 507 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Centennial HS
School year
Students enrolledCentennial HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
2,069
First available year
873.2
2022–23
2,082
Increase of 13 (0.6%)
893.4
2023–24
2,035
Decrease of 47 (2.3%)
883.7
2024–25
2,018
Decrease of 17 (0.8%)
874.9
2025–26
1,936
Decrease of 82 (4.1%)
864.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
62
3.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
132
6.41 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
2,060
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.0%
Selected comparison
4.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 rated schools reporting
−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
6.41
Selected comparison
8.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 345 rated schools reporting
−1.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Centennial HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
2,139
29
1.4%
53
2.48
3.4%
5.2
2021–22
2,146
78
3.6%
154
7.18
4.7%
8
2022–23
2,126
62
2.9%
105
4.94
4.9%
8.1
2023–24
2,087
64
3.1%
142
6.80
4.8%
8.1
2024–25
2,060
62
3.0%
132
6.41
4.8%
8.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Centennial HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
62
3.0%
132
6.41
4.8%
8.1
In-school suspensions
56
2.7%
75
3.64
4.5%
6.5
Out-of-school suspensions
30
1.5%
39
1.89
2.1%
2.7
DAEP placements
13
0.6%
15
0.73
1.6%
1.8
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Centennial HS
Parent district: Frisco ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,650
Selected comparison
$10,812
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 501 rated schools reporting
−$2,162 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,650 per student for this campus, $15,444 per student for its parent district, Frisco ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Centennial HS
Parent district: Frisco ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,488
$11,596
$13,054
$7,227
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,255
$11,635
$13,108
$7,309
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 437 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,697
$13,490
$14,058
$7,615
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 447 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,675
$14,862
$14,797
$8,288
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,120
$14,644
$15,708
$9,469
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 467 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,993
$15,227
$16,792
$9,534
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,542
$14,358
$18,125
$10,466
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,650
$15,444
$18,972
$10,812
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 501 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$73,466+$4,107 vs similar economic context
Teachers
129+73.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15+0.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Centennial HS
Beginning 2.3%
1 to 5 years 17.6%
6 to 10 years 21.1%
11 to 20 years 33.9%
21 to 30 years 19.9%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 513 reporting for every category shown · 513 in full cohort
Beginning 4.3%
1 to 5 years 23.6%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 31.8%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 29.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 633 reporting for every category shown · 633 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.4%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Centennial HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCentennial HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
20.9
18.7
Secondary languages other than English
21.4
21.4
Secondary math
23.3
18.9
Secondary science
24.3
21.6
Secondary social studies
23.1
21.6
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 94
Social Studies — Masters
Collin County · of the 94 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 94
Social Studies — Meets
Collin County · of the 94 that report this measure
3of 293
All Subjects — Meets
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 35
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Collin County · of the 35 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
7 measures
5of 35
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Collin County · of the 35 that report this measure
6of 293
All Subjects — Approaches
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 3
7of 275
Science — Meets
Collin County · of the 275 that report this measure
8of 293
Reading — Meets
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure
9of 292
Math — Approaches
Collin County · of the 292 that report this measure · tied with 5
9of 41
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Collin County (standard accountability only) · of the 41 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 41
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Collin County (standard accountability only) · of the 41 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
6 measures
14of 275
Science — Masters
Collin County · of the 275 that report this measure
18of 633
Math — Meets
Similar size · of the 633 that report this measure · tied with 4
25of 633
Closing the Gaps
Similar size · of the 633 that report this measure · tied with 12
26of 633
Math — Masters
Similar size · of the 633 that report this measure · tied with 2
30of 633
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 633 that report this measure · tied with 1
62of 1,110
Reading — Approaches
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,110 that report this measure · tied with 18
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043905002.