Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Centennial HS

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 1,936 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
93/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+1.5 ptsvs 91.5 average · 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
160 of 513tied with 79 others
A93

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.5 average for 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
91%vs 75.9% avg · +15.1 pts
Masters
55%vs 46.3% avg · +8.7 pts

Among 504 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
83%vs 72.4% avg · +10.6 pts
Masters
51%vs 41.9% avg · +9.1 pts

Among 502 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
94%vs 69.3% avg · +24.7 pts
Masters
70%vs 43.2% avg · +26.8 pts

Among 465 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Centennial HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.5 average for 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 160th of 513 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 79 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageCentennial HS 9091909493 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9391.5 513 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9491.9 502 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9091.1 488 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9191.5 476 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9092.1 466 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A−0.6 vs similar economic context · 504 reporting
  • School Progress86 B−1.7 vs similar economic context · 502 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps95 A+6.0 vs similar economic context · 499 reporting
  • Academic Growth74 C−12.2 vs similar economic context · 499 reporting
  • Relative Performance86 B+7.6 vs similar economic context · 502 reporting
  • Centennial HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (513 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps95A—
Academic Growth74C6
Relative Performance86B4

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level97%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
  • Meets grade level91%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
  • Masters grade level55%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
  • Meets grade level91%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 504 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting
  • Masters grade level51%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 reporting
  • Meets grade level94%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 reporting
  • Masters grade level70%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 465 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 reporting
  • Meets grade level96%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 reporting
  • Masters grade level76%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 171 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (513 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
99.6%+12.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 83 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.4%+13.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
98.2%+14.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 82 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.1%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 83 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
85.0%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria85.0%88.4%−3.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course73.7%69.3%+4.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA73.2%58.6%+14.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)65.4%39.2%+26.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course28.6%35.2%−6.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification8.0%26.4%−18.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.3%−0.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%10.5%−10.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness1.8%2.2%−0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student3.1%5.7%−2.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%1.4%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 80 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
477

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
202

42.3% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
179

37.5% of graduates

Not trackable
96

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
477
Selected comparison
432.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
202
Selected comparison
197.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
42.3%
Selected comparison
49.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting

−6.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
37.5%
Selected comparison
40.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting

−2.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
20.1%
Selected comparison
11.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated schools reporting

+9.1 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. COLLIN CO COMM COLL DISTRICT (023614)51
  2. U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (003658)41
  3. U. OF TEXAS AT DALLAS (009741)28

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,936
Economically disadvantaged
8.3%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.6%−7.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.4%−9.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.4%+5.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Centennial HS

African American: 6.8%Hispanic: 8.6%White: 25.6%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 55.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 3.5%
  • African American 6.8%
  • Hispanic 8.6%
  • White 25.6%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 55.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 3.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 513 reporting for every category shown · 513 in full cohort

African American: 5%Hispanic: 18%White: 48.7%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 22%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 5%
  • Hispanic 18%
  • White 48.7%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 22%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,936
Economically disadvantaged students
161
Emergent bilingual students
69
Special education students
123

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
88
Students in TEA mobility denominator
2,069
TEA-published mobility rate
4.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,936 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 82 (4.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,936

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−82

Decrease · −4.1%

Change since 2021–22
−133

Decrease · −6.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,936
Selected comparison
864.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 507 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Centennial HS
School yearStudents enrolledCentennial HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 2,069 First available year 873.2
2022–23 2,082 Increase of 13 (0.6%) 893.4
2023–24 2,035 Decrease of 47 (2.3%) 883.7
2024–25 2,018 Decrease of 17 (0.8%) 874.9
2025–26 1,936 Decrease of 82 (4.1%) 864.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
62

3.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
132

6.41 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
2,060

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.0%
Selected comparison
4.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 rated schools reporting

−1.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
6.41
Selected comparison
8.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 345 rated schools reporting

−1.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Centennial HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 2,139 29 1.4% 53 2.48 3.4% 5.2
2021–22 2,146 78 3.6% 154 7.18 4.7% 8
2022–23 2,126 62 2.9% 105 4.94 4.9% 8.1
2023–24 2,087 64 3.1% 142 6.80 4.8% 8.1
2024–25 2,060 62 3.0% 132 6.41 4.8% 8.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Centennial HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 62 3.0% 132 6.41 4.8% 8.1
In-school suspensions 56 2.7% 75 3.64 4.5% 6.5
Out-of-school suspensions 30 1.5% 39 1.89 2.1% 2.7
DAEP placements 13 0.6% 15 0.73 1.6% 1.8
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Centennial HS
  • Parent district: Frisco ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,650
Selected comparison
$10,812

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 501 rated schools reporting

−$2,162 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,650 per student for this campus, $15,444 per student for its parent district, Frisco ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearCentennial HSParent district: Frisco ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,488$11,596$13,054$7,227 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
2019$7,255$11,635$13,108$7,309 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 437 rated schools reporting
2020$7,697$13,490$14,058$7,615 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 447 rated schools reporting
2021$7,675$14,862$14,797$8,288 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
2022$9,120$14,644$15,708$9,469 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 467 rated schools reporting
2023$7,993$15,227$16,792$9,534 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
2024$8,542$14,358$18,125$10,466 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 488 rated schools reporting
2025$8,650$15,444$18,972$10,812 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 501 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,466+$4,107 vs similar economic context
Teachers
129+73.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15+0.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Centennial HS

Beginning: 2.3%1 to 5 years: 17.6%6 to 10 years: 21.1%11 to 20 years: 33.9%21 to 30 years: 19.9%Over 30 years: 5.2%
  • Beginning 2.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 17.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 33.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 19.9%
  • Over 30 years 5.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 513 reporting for every category shown · 513 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.3%1 to 5 years: 23.6%6 to 10 years: 20.1%11 to 20 years: 31.8%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 2.5%
  • Beginning 4.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Centennial HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classCentennial HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English20.918.7
Secondary languages other than English21.421.4
Secondary math23.318.9
Secondary science24.321.6
Secondary social studies23.121.6

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 94

    Social Studies — Masters

    Collin County · of the 94 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 2of 94

    Social Studies — Meets

    Collin County · of the 94 that report this measure

  • 3of 293

    All Subjects — Meets

    Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 35

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Collin County · of the 35 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 5of 35

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Collin County · of the 35 that report this measure

  • 6of 293

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 7of 275

    Science — Meets

    Collin County · of the 275 that report this measure

  • 8of 293

    Reading — Meets

    Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure

  • 9of 292

    Math — Approaches

    Collin County · of the 292 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 9of 41

    Four-Year Graduation Rate

    Collin County (standard accountability only) · of the 41 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 41

    Five-Year Graduation Rate

    Collin County (standard accountability only) · of the 41 that report this measure · tied with 2

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

6 measures

  • 14of 275

    Science — Masters

    Collin County · of the 275 that report this measure

  • 18of 633

    Math — Meets

    Similar size · of the 633 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 25of 633

    Closing the Gaps

    Similar size · of the 633 that report this measure · tied with 12

  • 26of 633

    Math — Masters

    Similar size · of the 633 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 30of 633

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 633 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 62of 1,110

    Reading — Approaches

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,110 that report this measure · tied with 18

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043905002.