+5.9 ptsvs 78.1 average · 2,092 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
598 of 2,092tied with 80 others
Score vs region
+0.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
653 of 1,303tied with 43 others
Score vs county
+0.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
449 of 911tied with 34 others
Score vs similar-size group
+3.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,513 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,814 of 4,513tied with 152 others
Score vs state
+2.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,325 of 7,646tied with 275 others
B84
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.1 average for 2,092 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,513 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
51%vs 43.4% avg · +7.6 pts
Masters
27%vs 17.1% avg · +9.9 pts
Among 1,934 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Cedar Brook Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.1 average for 2,092 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 598th of 2,092 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 80 others).
Cedar Brook Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 653rd of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 43 others).
Cedar Brook Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 449th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 34 others).
Cedar Brook Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,513 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,814th of 4,513 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 152 others).
Cedar Brook Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement78 C+4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,934 reporting
School Progress85 B+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,929 reporting
Closing the Gaps83 B+7.6 vs similar economic context · 1,915 reporting
Academic Growth83 B+10.5 vs similar economic context · 1,879 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,929 reporting
Cedar Brook Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,092 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
78
C
2
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
83
B
7
Academic Growth
83
B
7
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so
Student Achievement (78) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level74%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
Meets grade level51%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
Masters grade level27%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 reporting
Meets grade level51%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 reporting
Masters grade level28%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 reporting
Meets grade level56%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 reporting
Masters grade level29%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,784 reporting
Meets grade level34%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,784 reporting
Masters grade level19%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,784 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,092 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
652
Economically disadvantaged
77.1%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
60.7%+34.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.9%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.3%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.6%−6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Cedar Brook Elem
African American 6.6%
Hispanic 83.7%
White 6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.1%
Two or More Races 1.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,092 reporting for every category shown · 2,092 in full cohort
African American 13.7%
Hispanic 64.4%
White 16.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,513 reporting for every category shown · 4,513 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.2%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
652
Economically disadvantaged students
503
Emergent bilingual students
396
Special education students
123
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
94
Students in TEA mobility denominator
571
TEA-published mobility rate
16.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 652 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 2 (0.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
652
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−2
Decrease · −0.3%
Change since 2021–22
−18
Decrease · −2.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
652
Selected comparison
639
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Cedar Brook Elem
School year
Students enrolledCedar Brook Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
670
First available year
657.4
2022–23
657
Decrease of 13 (1.9%)
660.8
2023–24
669
Increase of 12 (1.8%)
657.1
2024–25
654
Decrease of 15 (2.2%)
655.8
2025–26
652
Decrease of 2 (0.3%)
639
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
710
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Cedar Brook Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
714
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
704
31
4.4%
49
6.96
12.9%
31
2022–23
690
11
1.6%
16
2.32
13.6%
33.8
2023–24
722
Suppressed
—
13
1.80
—
33.7
2024–25
710
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Cedar Brook Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Cedar Brook Elem
Parent district: Spring Branch ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,963
Selected comparison
$12,975
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,079 rated schools reporting
−$2,012 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,963 per student for this campus, $21,125 per student for its parent district, Spring Branch ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Cedar Brook Elem
Parent district: Spring Branch ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,397
$12,780
$13,054
$8,065
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,006
$13,329
$13,108
$8,221
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,980 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,700
$16,243
$14,058
$8,748
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,998 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,016
$21,382
$14,797
$9,334
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,010 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,381
$18,728
$15,708
$10,667
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,507
$19,038
$16,792
$11,239
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,045 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,847
$20,245
$18,125
$12,242
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,963
$21,125
$18,972
$12,975
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,079 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,792+$6,032 vs similar economic context
Teachers
46+2.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.3+0.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Cedar Brook Elem
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 22.2%
6 to 10 years 29%
11 to 20 years 31.2%
21 to 30 years 13.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,092 reporting for every category shown · 2,092 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 27.5%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,513 reporting for every category shown · 4,513 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Cedar Brook Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCedar Brook Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18
18
Grade 1
20
18.3
Grade 2
19.5
18.4
Grade 3
19.1
18.8
Grade 4
18.4
19
Grade 5
23.3
20
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
102of 1,924
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,924 that report this measure · tied with 15
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101920124.