−1.2 ptsvs 92.2 average · 248 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
172 of 248tied with 25 others
Score vs region
+10.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
122 of 839tied with 43 others
Score vs county
+11.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
71 of 466tied with 22 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.6 ptsvs 84.4 average · 1,178 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
262 of 1,178tied with 84 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 98 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 92.2 average for 248 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 84.4 average for 1,178 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
98%vs 75.3% avg · +22.7 pts
Masters
67%vs 45.5% avg · +21.5 pts
Among 242 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 2nd of 242 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 2 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Carroll Senior HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 92.2 average for 248 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 172nd of 248 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 25 others).
Carroll Senior HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 122nd of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 43 others).
Carroll Senior HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 71st of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 22 others).
Carroll Senior HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.4 average for 1,178 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 262nd of 1,178 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 84 others).
Carroll Senior HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 98 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement95 A+1.8 vs similar economic context · 243 reporting
School Progress89 B+0.5 vs similar economic context · 242 reporting
Closing the Gaps80 B−10.3 vs similar economic context · 240 reporting
Relative Performance89 B+11.0 vs similar economic context · 242 reporting
Carroll Senior HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (248 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
95
A
—
School Progress
89
B
1
Closing the Gaps
80
B
10
Academic Growth
—
Not rated
—
Relative Performance
89
B
1
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 10 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so
School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level98%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 243 reporting
Meets grade level93%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 243 reporting
Masters grade level67%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 243 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level53%−41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 243 reporting
Meets grade level24%−59 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 243 reporting
Masters grade level0%−53 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 243 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 reporting
Meets grade level98%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 reporting
Masters grade level67%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 reporting
Approaches grade level99%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Meets grade level92%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Masters grade level69%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (248 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
99.6%+7.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.9%+9.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
99.6%+15.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.1%±0.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
90.0%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
90.0%
87.3%
+2.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
81.1%
71.4%
+9.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
81.1%
64.1%
+17.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
61.6%
47.8%
+13.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
30.3%
34.2%
−3.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
10.3%
22.2%
−11.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.6%
−0.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
0.1%
−0.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
7.2%
−7.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
1.0%
1.9%
−0.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
5.1%
4.8%
+0.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.4%
1.1%
−0.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
702
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
239
34.0% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
419
59.7% of graduates
Not trackable
44
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
702
Selected comparison
451.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
239
Selected comparison
191.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
34.0%
Selected comparison
45.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated schools reporting
−11.1 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
59.7%
Selected comparison
45.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated schools reporting
+14.7 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
6.3%
Selected comparison
9.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated schools reporting
−3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)47
U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (003658)31
U. OF TEXAS AT DALLAS (009741)24
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,378
Economically disadvantaged
0.7%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.5%−9.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.8%−8.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.3%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
19.3%+13.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Carroll Senior HS
African American 2.1%
Hispanic 11.6%
White 55.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 25.2%
Pacific Islander 0.4%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting for every category shown · 248 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 14.6%
White 48.8%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 26.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,178 reporting for every category shown · 1,178 in full cohort
African American 12.9%
Hispanic 50.5%
White 24.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,377
Economically disadvantaged students
10
Emergent bilingual students
21
Special education students
94
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
48
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,435
TEA-published mobility rate
3.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,378 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 44 (3.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,378
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−44
Decrease · −3.1%
Change since 2021–22
−16
Decrease · −1.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,378
Selected comparison
845.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Carroll Senior HS
School year
Students enrolledCarroll Senior HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,394
First available year
858.7
2022–23
1,444
Increase of 50 (3.6%)
873.5
2023–24
1,411
Decrease of 33 (2.3%)
858.6
2024–25
1,422
Increase of 11 (0.8%)
855.1
2025–26
1,378
Decrease of 44 (3.1%)
845.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
50
3.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
89
6.20 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,435
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.5%
Selected comparison
4.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 rated schools reporting
−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
6.2
Selected comparison
6.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated schools reporting
−0.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Carroll Senior HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,372
10
0.7%
17
1.24
2.9%
4.5
2021–22
1,412
12
0.8%
19
1.35
4.3%
7.2
2022–23
1,464
13
0.9%
22
1.50
4.2%
6.3
2023–24
1,431
44
3.1%
63
4.40
4.1%
6.6
2024–25
1,435
50
3.5%
89
6.20
4.2%
6.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Carroll Senior HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
50
3.5%
89
6.20
4.2%
6.6
In-school suspensions
30
2.1%
35
2.44
4.0%
5.4
Out-of-school suspensions
26
1.8%
28
1.95
1.7%
2.1
DAEP placements
23
1.6%
26
1.81
1.3%
1.4
Mandatory DAEP placements
14
1.0%
14
0.98
1.0%
1.1
Discretionary DAEP placements
11
0.8%
12
0.84
0.7%
0.8
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Carroll Senior HS
Parent district: Carroll ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,329
Selected comparison
$10,669
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 239 rated schools reporting
−$1,340 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,329 per student for this campus, $17,762 per student for its parent district, Carroll ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Carroll Senior HS
Parent district: Carroll ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,791
$16,700
$13,054
$7,151
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,847
$20,818
$13,108
$7,293
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,995
$19,862
$14,058
$7,577
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,201
$17,912
$14,797
$8,042
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 220 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,580
$14,946
$15,708
$9,204
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,201
$15,707
$16,792
$9,098
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 227 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,974
$17,368
$18,125
$10,071
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 236 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,329
$17,762
$18,972
$10,669
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 239 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,551+$988 vs similar economic context
Teachers
87+31.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.8+1.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Carroll Senior HS
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 15.5%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 32.9%
21 to 30 years 24.5%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting for every category shown · 248 in full cohort
Beginning 4.1%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.2%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,178 reporting for every category shown · 1,178 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Carroll Senior HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCarroll Senior HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
18.7
18.9
Secondary languages other than English
8
21.7
Secondary math
21.4
18.8
Secondary science
18.8
21.4
Secondary social studies
20.4
21.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 180 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 1,173
Math — Meets
Similar size · of the 1,173 that report this measure
1of 810
Math — Masters
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
3of 1,173
Math — Approaches
Similar size · of the 1,173 that report this measure · tied with 4
3of 813
All Subjects — Masters
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 155
Social Studies — Masters
Tarrant County · of the 155 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
4of 457
All Subjects — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure
4of 152
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 152 that report this measure
5of 33
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 33 that report this measure
6of 457
All Subjects — Approaches
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 155
Social Studies — Meets
Tarrant County · of the 155 that report this measure
6of 64
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Tarrant County (standard accountability only) · of the 64 that report this measure
8of 64
Six-Year Graduation Rate
Tarrant County (standard accountability only) · of the 64 that report this measure
9of 64
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Tarrant County (standard accountability only) · of the 64 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
12of 879
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar size · of the 879 that report this measure · tied with 11
24of 813
Student Achievement
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 16
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220919001.