+11.9 ptsvs 87.1 average · 1,053 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 1,053tied with 7 others
Score vs region
+15.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
2 of 1,303tied with 12 others
Score vs county
+15.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
2 of 911tied with 11 others
Score vs similar-size group
+18.0 ptsvs 81 average · 3,306 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2 of 3,306tied with 7 others
Score vs state
+17.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
5 of 7,646tied with 29 others
A99
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87.1 average for 1,053 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 81 average for 3,306 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average
100+15.5 pts vs 84.5
100 is 15.5 points above
the 84.5 average among 1,021 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st of 1,021 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 9 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Carnegie Vanguard HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.1 average for 1,053 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 1,053 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).
Carnegie Vanguard HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 12 others).
Carnegie Vanguard HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 11 others).
Carnegie Vanguard HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 3,306 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 3,306 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 7 others).
Carnegie Vanguard HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement99 A+11.2 vs similar economic context · 1,031 reporting
School Progress99 A+14.9 vs similar economic context · 1,029 reporting
Closing the Gaps100 A+15.5 vs similar economic context · 1,021 reporting
Academic Growth79 C−1.1 vs similar economic context · 1,010 reporting
Relative Performance99 A+19.1 vs similar economic context · 1,029 reporting
Carnegie Vanguard HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,053 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
99
A
—
School Progress
99
A
—
Closing the Gaps
100
A
—
Academic Growth
79
C
1
Relative Performance
99
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level100%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,031 reporting
Meets grade level99%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,031 reporting
Masters grade level72%+40 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,031 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,030 reporting
Meets grade level99%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,030 reporting
Masters grade level57%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,030 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,028 reporting
Meets grade level97%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,028 reporting
Masters grade level65%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,028 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
Meets grade level100%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
Masters grade level87%+53 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 reporting
Meets grade level99%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 reporting
Masters grade level92%+58 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,053 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
99.5%+7.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 305 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.0%+7.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 304 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 305 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 305 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+10.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
89.4%
+10.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
98.9%
63.7%
+35.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
98.4%
42.4%
+56.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
98.4%
19.7%
+78.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
0.5%
39.1%
−38.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
36.1%
−36.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.7%
−0.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
4.5%
−4.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.5%
6.6%
−6.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
2.5%
−2.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.5%
6.8%
−6.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
3.1%
−3.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 302 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
193
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
96
49.7% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
62
32.1% of graduates
Not trackable
35
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
193
Selected comparison
289.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 256 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
96
Selected comparison
140.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 256 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
49.7%
Selected comparison
49.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 256 rated schools reporting
+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
32.1%
Selected comparison
44.7%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 256 rated schools reporting
−12.6 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
18.1%
Selected comparison
6.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 256 rated schools reporting
+12.1 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)27
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)13
U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (003658)13
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
874
Economically disadvantaged
30.9%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.1%−8.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
1.1%−16.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.0%−6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Carnegie Vanguard HS
African American 10.8%
Hispanic 32.6%
White 17%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 34.2%
Two or More Races 5.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,053 reporting for every category shown · 1,053 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 30.2%
White 48.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,306 reporting for every category shown · 3,306 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
874
Economically disadvantaged students
270
Emergent bilingual students
18
Special education students
10
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
19
Students in TEA mobility denominator
858
TEA-published mobility rate
2.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 874 students in 2025–26, an increase of 19 (2.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
874
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+19
Increase · +2.2%
Change since 2021–22
−39
Decrease · −4.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
874
Selected comparison
787.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,041 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Carnegie Vanguard HS
School year
Students enrolledCarnegie Vanguard HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
913
First available year
798.1
2022–23
841
Decrease of 72 (7.9%)
800.9
2023–24
824
Decrease of 17 (2.0%)
798.9
2024–25
855
Increase of 31 (3.8%)
795.6
2025–26
874
Increase of 19 (2.2%)
787.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18
2.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
19
2.24 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
847
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.1%
Selected comparison
9.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 791 rated schools reporting
−6.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.24
Selected comparison
18.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 rated schools reporting
−16.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Carnegie Vanguard HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
919
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
910
24
2.6%
27
2.97
9.5%
19.2
2022–23
841
19
2.3%
24
2.85
9.7%
19.9
2023–24
828
20
2.4%
22
2.66
9.3%
19.8
2024–25
847
18
2.1%
19
2.24
9.0%
18.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Carnegie Vanguard HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
18
2.1%
19
2.24
9.0%
18.4
In-school suspensions
11
1.3%
12
1.42
8.1%
14.4
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Carnegie Vanguard HS
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,576
Selected comparison
$11,713
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,033 rated schools reporting
−$3,137 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,576 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Carnegie Vanguard HS
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,783
$14,470
$13,054
$7,634
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 929 rated schools reporting
2019
$4,915
$13,643
$13,108
$7,773
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 rated schools reporting
2020
$5,167
$13,627
$14,058
$8,110
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 955 rated schools reporting
2021
$5,985
$13,515
$14,797
$8,525
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,139
$14,985
$15,708
$9,747
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 986 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,343
$16,350
$16,792
$10,287
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,002 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,799
$18,150
$18,125
$11,453
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,015 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,576
$17,026
$18,972
$11,713
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,033 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,272+$3,098 vs similar economic context
Teachers
39−12.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
22.4+7.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Carnegie Vanguard HS
Beginning 2.6%
1 to 5 years 7.7%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 43.2%
21 to 30 years 23.4%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,053 reporting for every category shown · 1,053 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 22.6%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32.2%
21 to 30 years 17.2%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,306 reporting for every category shown · 3,306 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.8%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Carnegie Vanguard HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classCarnegie Vanguard HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
24.1
16.6
Secondary languages other than English
22.8
18.7
Secondary math
27.1
17.4
Secondary science
28.3
18.9
Secondary social studies
27.5
19
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
9 measures
1of 7,260
All Subjects — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,260 that report this measure · tied with 24
1of 7,254
Reading — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 32
1of 7,185
Closing the Gaps
Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking
1of 6,717
Science — Meets
Texas average · of the 6,717 that report this measure · tied with 7
1of 3,249
School Progress
Similar size · of the 3,249 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 3,249
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 3,249 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 3,037
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 3,037 that report this measure · tied with 17
1of 1,242
All Subjects — Meets
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,242 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 1,221
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar size · of the 1,221 that report this measure · tied with 12
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
9 measures
2of 3,306
Overall score
Similar size · of the 3,306 that report this measure · tied with 7
2of 3,249
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 3,249 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 1,242
Reading — Meets
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,242 that report this measure · tied with 3
2of 1,239
Math — Meets
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,239 that report this measure
2of 1,221
Social Studies — Meets
Similar size · of the 1,221 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 1,221
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 1,221 that report this measure
2of 302
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 302 that report this measure
3of 3,037
Science — Masters
Similar size · of the 3,037 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 282
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar size · of the 282 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
4of 198
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Region 04: Houston · of the 198 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 3,249
Math — Approaches
Similar size · of the 3,249 that report this measure · tied with 5
6of 1,242
All Subjects — Masters
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,242 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 1,028
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,028 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
36of 874
Attendance
Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 7
46of 1,030
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,030 that report this measure · tied with 7
67of 1,236
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,236 that report this measure · tied with 3
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912322.