Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.
Traditional public school campus
Williamson County · Region 13: Austin · 356 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.7 average for 386 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is above the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County.The current score is above the 80.3 average for 3,496 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Current strength
97 +10.2 pts vs 86.8
STAAR result
Among 379 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 377 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
97 +21 pts vs 76
Current strength
97 +18.2 pts vs 78.8
STAAR result
Among 503 schools in Region 13: Austin reporting this measure.
Current strength
97 +15.4 pts vs 81.6
Current strength
97 +17.1 pts vs 79.9
Current strength
97 +13.5 pts vs 83.5
STAAR result
Among 3,238 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 3,238 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 3,238 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 7,260 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 7,227 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 7,254 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Canyon Creek Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.7 average for 386 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 386 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).
Canyon Creek Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 2 others).
Canyon Creek Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.5 average for 164 rated schools in Williamson County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 164 rated schools in Williamson County.
Canyon Creek Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 3,496 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 54th of 3,496 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 38 others).
Canyon Creek Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 82nd of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 63 others).
Put the numbers in context
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 97 | 91.7 386 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 97 | 92.2 378 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 97 | 91.4 367 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | A | 96 | 91.8 357 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 97 | 92.4 350 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 97 | A | — |
| School Progress | 97 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 97 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 97 | A | — |
| Relative Performance | 92 | A | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Canyon Creek Elem
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 386 reporting for every category shown · 386 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,496 reporting for every category shown · 3,496 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 356 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (1.7%) from 2024–25.
2025–26
Increase · +1.7%
Increase · +7.6%
| School year | Students enrolledCanyon Creek Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 331 | First available year | 870.6 |
| 2022–23 | 369 | Increase of 38 (11.5%) | 892.3 |
| 2023–24 | 349 | Decrease of 20 (5.4%) | 881 |
| 2024–25 | 350 | Increase of 1 (0.3%) | 872 |
| 2025–26 | 356 | Increase of 6 (1.7%) | 857.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Rate not available
Rate not available
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 405 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 374 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 378 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 363 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 358 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
For 2025, TEA reported $9,903 per student for this campus, $16,516 per student for its parent district, Round Rock ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
| Year | Canyon Creek Elem | Parent district: Round Rock ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $7,151 | $12,357 | $13,054 | $7,204 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,647 | $11,300 | $13,108 | $7,357 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 326 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $8,380 | $12,713 | $14,058 | $7,663 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 335 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $9,388 | $15,241 | $14,797 | $8,288 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 344 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $10,618 | $15,983 | $15,708 | $9,583 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $9,743 | $14,746 | $16,792 | $9,489 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 356 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $10,253 | $15,268 | $18,125 | $10,287 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $9,903 | $16,516 | $18,972 | $10,972 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Canyon Creek Elem
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 386 reporting for every category shown · 386 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,496 reporting for every category shown · 3,496 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
| Grade or subject | Average students per classCanyon Creek Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 17 | 19 |
| Grade 1 | 19.7 | 19.2 |
| Grade 2 | 18.4 | 19.6 |
| Grade 3 | 17.5 | 21.6 |
| Grade 4 | 16.8 | 20.4 |
| Grade 5 | 15.3 | 22.3 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
First-place results
10 measures
Math — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 37
Reading — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 505 that report this measure
Math — Meets
Region 13: Austin · of the 503 that report this measure · tied with 1
Academic Growth
Region 13: Austin · of the 491 that report this measure
School Progress
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 1
All Subjects — Approaches
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure
All Subjects — Meets
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure
All Subjects — Masters
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure
Reading — Approaches
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure
Reading — Meets
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
Overall score
Williamson County · of the 164 that report this measure
Student Achievement
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 2
Math — Masters
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure
Attendance
Williamson County · of the 161 that report this measure
Closing the Gaps
Williamson County · of the 160 that report this measure
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Williamson County · of the 161 that report this measure
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
Relative Performance
Williamson County · of the 162 that report this measure · tied with 1
Science — Approaches
Williamson County · of the 161 that report this measure · tied with 3
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
Science — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 494 that report this measure · tied with 1
Science — Meets
Similar size · of the 2,944 that report this measure · tied with 8
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246909125.