+11.4 ptsvs 86.6 average · 1,111 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
8 of 1,111tied with 11 others
Score vs region
+17.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
4 of 839tied with 4 others
Score vs county
+17.0 ptsvs 81 average · 63 rated schools in Johnson County
Johnson County placement
1 of 63among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+16.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 997 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2 of 997tied with 11 others
Score vs state
+16.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
35 of 7,646tied with 46 others
A98
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 99 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86.6 average for 1,111 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 81 average for 63 rated schools in Johnson County.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 997 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
94%vs 62.8% avg · +31.2 pts
Masters
48%vs 30.8% avg · +17.2 pts
Among 1,085 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Burleson Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.6 average for 1,111 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 8th of 1,111 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 11 others).
Burleson Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 4 others).
Burleson Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 63 rated schools in Johnson County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 63 rated schools in Johnson County.
Burleson Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 997 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 997 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 11 others).
Burleson Collegiate HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 99 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement98 A+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,085 reporting
School Progress97 A+13.2 vs similar economic context · 1,082 reporting
Closing the Gaps99 A+15.0 vs similar economic context · 1,074 reporting
Academic Growth83 B+3.4 vs similar economic context · 1,065 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+17.1 vs similar economic context · 1,082 reporting
Burleson Collegiate HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,111 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
98
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
99
A
—
Academic Growth
83
B
7
Relative Performance
97
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (98), so
School Progress (97) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 98.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level98%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,085 reporting
Meets grade level94%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,085 reporting
Masters grade level48%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,085 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,084 reporting
Meets grade level97%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,084 reporting
Masters grade level39%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,084 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,081 reporting
Meets grade level76%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,081 reporting
Masters grade level18%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,081 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 994 reporting
Meets grade level97%+35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 994 reporting
Masters grade level76%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 994 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 564 reporting
Meets grade level96%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 564 reporting
Masters grade level58%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 564 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,111 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+7.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+8.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 318 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+10.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
89.1%
+10.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
94.6%
63.6%
+31.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
94.6%
40.9%
+53.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
18.3%
−18.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
100.0%
38.4%
+61.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
35.5%
−35.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.8%
−0.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
94.6%
4.7%
+89.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
6.5%
−6.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
2.6%
−2.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
5.4%
7.0%
−1.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
2.7%
3.1%
−0.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
52
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
35
67.3% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
15
28.8% of graduates
Not trackable
2
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
52
Selected comparison
275.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 277 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
35
Selected comparison
132.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 277 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
67.3%
Selected comparison
49.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 277 rated schools reporting
+18.2 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
28.8%
Selected comparison
45.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 277 rated schools reporting
−16.5 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
3.8%
Selected comparison
5.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 277 rated schools reporting
−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)9
U. OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON (003656)7
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY (003644)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
172
Economically disadvantaged
32.6%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.7%−8.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
3.5%−14.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.2%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Burleson Collegiate HS
African American 8.1%
Hispanic 29.7%
White 51.7%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 4.7%
Two or More Races 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,111 reporting for every category shown · 1,111 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 31.1%
White 47.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Johnson County · 63 reporting for every category shown · 63 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 38.3%
White 49.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.7%
Pacific Islander 1.4%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 997 reporting for every category shown · 997 in full cohort
African American 7.2%
Hispanic 45.4%
White 42.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
172
Economically disadvantaged students
56
Emergent bilingual students
3
Special education students
6
Early college pathways
Early College High School
171
TEA-published share: 99.4%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
10
Students in TEA mobility denominator
93
TEA-published mobility rate
10.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 172 students in 2025–26, an increase of 21 (13.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
172
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+21
Increase · +13.9%
Change since 2021–22
−41
Decrease · −19.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
172
Selected comparison
776.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,093 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Burleson Collegiate HS
School year
Students enrolledBurleson Collegiate HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
213
First available year
788.5
2022–23
177
Decrease of 36 (16.9%)
790
2023–24
150
Decrease of 27 (15.3%)
787.7
2024–25
151
Increase of 1 (0.7%)
784.9
2025–26
172
Increase of 21 (13.9%)
776.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
145
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Burleson Collegiate HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
239
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
211
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
174
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
149
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
145
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Burleson Collegiate HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Burleson Collegiate HS
Parent district: Burleson ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,004
Selected comparison
$11,817
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,089 rated schools reporting
−$813 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,004 per student for this campus, $15,909 per student for its parent district, Burleson ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Burleson Collegiate HS
Parent district: Burleson ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,730
$11,777
$13,054
$7,624
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 986 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,072
$15,291
$13,108
$7,738
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,000 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,543
$12,743
$14,058
$8,089
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,009 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,462
$12,448
$14,797
$8,525
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,021 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,352
$12,954
$15,708
$9,780
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,041 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,835
$14,438
$16,792
$10,303
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,061 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,966
$14,561
$18,125
$11,389
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,073 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,004
$15,909
$18,972
$11,817
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,089 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$68,177+$32 vs similar economic context
Teachers
12−39.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.9+0.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Burleson Collegiate HS
1 to 5 years 17.4%
6 to 10 years 43.5%
11 to 20 years 21.7%
21 to 30 years 17.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,111 reporting for every category shown · 1,111 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 22.5%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 32.1%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Johnson County · 63 reporting for every category shown · 63 in full cohort
Beginning 4.2%
1 to 5 years 22.3%
6 to 10 years 22.1%
11 to 20 years 32.9%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 997 reporting for every category shown · 997 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 23.3%
6 to 10 years 17.3%
11 to 20 years 28.2%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 5.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Burleson Collegiate HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBurleson Collegiate HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
15.2
16.5
Secondary languages other than English
10.6
18.6
Secondary math
12.1
17.3
Secondary science
12
18.8
Secondary social studies
14.6
18.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
23 measures
1of 379
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar size · of the 379 that report this measure · tied with 7
1of 379
Earned an associate degree
Similar size · of the 379 that report this measure
1of 63
Overall score
Johnson County · of the 63 that report this measure
1of 61
Student Achievement
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 61
School Progress
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 61
Relative Performance
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 61
All Subjects — Approaches
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 61
All Subjects — Meets
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 61
All Subjects — Masters
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 61
Reading — Approaches
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 61
Reading — Meets
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 61
Math — Meets
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
1of 59
Closing the Gaps
Johnson County · of the 59 that report this measure
1of 52
Science — Meets
Johnson County · of the 52 that report this measure
1of 52
Science — Masters
Johnson County · of the 52 that report this measure
1of 27
Social Studies — Approaches
Johnson County · of the 27 that report this measure
1of 27
Social Studies — Meets
Johnson County · of the 27 that report this measure
1of 27
Social Studies — Masters
Johnson County · of the 27 that report this measure
1of 15
College, career or military ready
Johnson County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 15
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Johnson County · of the 15 that report this measure
1of 15
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Johnson County · of the 15 that report this measure
1of 13
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Johnson County (standard accountability only) · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 13
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Johnson County (standard accountability only) · of the 13 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 61
Reading — Masters
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
4of 61
Math — Approaches
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 52
Science — Approaches
Johnson County · of the 52 that report this measure
8of 15
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Johnson County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 126902007.