+6.3 ptsvs 77.7 average · 1,869 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
569 of 1,869tied with 59 others
Score vs region
+0.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
653 of 1,303tied with 43 others
Score vs county
+0.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
449 of 911tied with 34 others
Score vs similar-size group
+0.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 1,343 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
722 of 1,343tied with 49 others
Score vs state
+2.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,325 of 7,646tied with 275 others
B84
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.7 average for 1,869 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is level with the 83.9 average for 1,343 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
46%vs 40.5% avg · +5.5 pts
Masters
21%vs 16.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Among 1,733 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Burbank MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.7 average for 1,869 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 569th of 1,869 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 59 others).
Burbank MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 653rd of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 43 others).
Burbank MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 449th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 34 others).
Burbank MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 83.9 average for 1,343 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 722nd of 1,343 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 49 others).
Burbank MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement78 C+7.8 vs similar economic context · 1,733 reporting
School Progress90 A+11.1 vs similar economic context · 1,730 reporting
Closing the Gaps70 C−5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,720 reporting
Academic Growth76 C+2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,707 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+13.2 vs similar economic context · 1,729 reporting
Burbank MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,869 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
78
C
2
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
70
C
10
Academic Growth
76
C
4
Relative Performance
90
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 10 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so
Student Achievement (78) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level74%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Meets grade level46%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Masters grade level21%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Meets grade level55%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Masters grade level27%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level77%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
Meets grade level46%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
Masters grade level18%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 reporting
Meets grade level44%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 reporting
Masters grade level19%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level54%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
Meets grade level26%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
Masters grade level12%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,869 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,301
Economically disadvantaged
94.6%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
39.4%−2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.1%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.8%−9.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Burbank MS
African American 6.2%
Hispanic 92.2%
White 1.2%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,869 reporting for every category shown · 1,869 in full cohort
African American 15%
Hispanic 77%
White 4.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,343 reporting for every category shown · 1,343 in full cohort
African American 12.7%
Hispanic 50.5%
White 24.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,301
Economically disadvantaged students
1,231
Emergent bilingual students
513
Special education students
158
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
201
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,521
TEA-published mobility rate
13.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,301 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 111 (7.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,301
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−111
Decrease · −7.9%
Change since 2021–22
−122
Decrease · −8.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,301
Selected comparison
561
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Burbank MS
School year
Students enrolledBurbank MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,423
First available year
608.9
2022–23
1,417
Decrease of 6 (0.4%)
604.9
2023–24
1,454
Increase of 37 (2.6%)
594.8
2024–25
1,412
Decrease of 42 (2.9%)
587.7
2025–26
1,301
Decrease of 111 (7.9%)
561
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
367
25.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
1,083
73.67 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,470
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
25.0%
Selected comparison
13.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,102 rated schools reporting
+12.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
73.67
Selected comparison
30.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,193 rated schools reporting
+43.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Burbank MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,546
38
2.5%
45
2.91
6.8%
13
2021–22
1,506
299
19.9%
726
48.21
12.5%
29.5
2022–23
1,478
387
26.2%
1,008
68.20
13.6%
32.7
2023–24
1,509
354
23.5%
1,201
79.59
13.6%
32.8
2024–25
1,470
367
25.0%
1,083
73.67
13.0%
30.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Burbank MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
367
25.0%
1,083
73.67
13.0%
30.7
In-school suspensions
320
21.8%
813
55.31
11.3%
21.8
Out-of-school suspensions
138
9.4%
230
15.65
9.5%
15.7
DAEP placements
36
2.5%
40
2.72
5.1%
6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements
26
1.8%
27
1.84
3.9%
4.6
Discretionary DAEP placements
11
0.8%
13
0.88
3.3%
4
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Burbank MS
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,047
Selected comparison
$13,292
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,851 rated schools reporting
−$4,245 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,047 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Burbank MS
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,791
$14,470
$13,054
$8,350
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,760 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,505
$13,643
$13,108
$8,364
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,784 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,777
$13,627
$14,058
$8,860
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,031
$13,515
$14,797
$9,701
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,249
$14,985
$15,708
$11,228
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,807 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,052
$16,350
$16,792
$11,847
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,830 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,231
$18,150
$18,125
$12,723
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,047
$17,026
$18,972
$13,292
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,851 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,571+$2,114 vs similar economic context
Teachers
78+38.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.7+2.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Burbank MS
Beginning 24.4%
1 to 5 years 30.8%
6 to 10 years 14%
11 to 20 years 12.3%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,869 reporting for every category shown · 1,869 in full cohort
Beginning 7.6%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 18.7%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,343 reporting for every category shown · 1,343 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 29.1%
21 to 30 years 14.3%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Burbank MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBurbank MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
22.2
17.3
Secondary English
15.3
15.1
Secondary languages other than English
19.6
18.2
Secondary math
22
16.8
Secondary science
22.8
17.7
Secondary social studies
23.9
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912043.