Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
9.7% −9.9 pts vs 19.6%
- 9.7% is 9.9 percentage points lower than the 19.6% average among 2,012 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Brule Elem
Grimes County · Region 06: Huntsville · 357 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 60/1002025-26
- Change
- −25 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −18.1 ptsvs 78.1 average · 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,940 of 2,090tied with 13 others
- Score vs region
- −20.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
- Region 06: Huntsville placement
- 300 of 314tied with 4 others
- Score vs county
- −17.7 ptsvs 77.7 average · 10 rated schools in Grimes County
- Grimes County placement
- 9 of 10among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- −20.3 ptsvs 80.3 average · 3,507 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 3,310 of 3,507tied with 10 others
- Score vs state
- −21.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 7,313 of 7,646tied with 22 others
D60
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 78.1 average for 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is below the 77.7 average for 10 rated schools in Grimes County.The current score is below the 80.3 average for 3,507 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
95% +1.4 pts vs 93.6%
- 95% is 1.4 percentage points above the 93.6% average among 2,014 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 06: Huntsville average
9.7% −4.9 pts vs 14.6%
- 9.7% is 4.9 percentage points lower than the 14.6% average among 303 schools in Region 06: Huntsville reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Grimes County.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
9.7% −6 pts vs 15.7%
- 9.7% is 6 percentage points lower than the 15.7% average among 3,363 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
9.7% −7 pts vs 16.7%
- 9.7% is 7 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Brule Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 60 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.1 average for 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 25 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,940th of 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 13 others).
Brule Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 60 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is down 25 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 300th of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 4 others).
Brule Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 60 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.7 average for 10 rated schools in Grimes County. It is down 25 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 10 rated schools in Grimes County.
Brule Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 60 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.3 average for 3,507 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 25 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,310th of 3,507 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 10 others).
Brule Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 60 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 25 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7,313th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 22 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- Official improvement and transfer notices
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
Official improvement and transfer notices
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
2026 federal improvement status
Comprehensive Support and Improvement
Official support label: Comprehensive Identified
Identification reason: CSI Low Performance
TEA track year 1 · Title I campus
Schools identified for improvement
- This school
- Listed
- Selected comparison
- 32.8%
Schools on the PEG list
- This school
- Not listed
- Selected comparison
- 5.8%
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | D | 60 | 78.1 2,090 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 78 | 77.8 2,079 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | C | 78 | 75.4 2,066 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 73 | 75.9 2,043 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 85 | 81.8 2,026 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Brule Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,090 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 64 | D | 6 |
| School Progress | 66 | D | 4 |
| Closing the Gaps | 46 | F | 14 |
| Academic Growth | 56 | F | 4 |
| Relative Performance | 66 | D | 4 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (66), so Student Achievement (64) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 66.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,090 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 357
- Economically disadvantaged
- 77.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 22.1%−3.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 19.9%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.0%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 9.7%−9.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Brule Elem
- African American 21.8%
- Hispanic 61.3%
- White 15.1%
- Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,090 reporting for every category shown · 2,090 in full cohort
- African American 13.6%
- Hispanic 64.3%
- White 16.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 38.9%
- White 42.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison average For Grimes County · 10 reporting for every category shown · 10 in full cohort
- African American 8.7%
- Hispanic 37.6%
- White 50.4%
- American Indian 0.1%
- Asian 0.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,507 reporting for every category shown · 3,507 in full cohort
- African American 11.2%
- Hispanic 54.4%
- White 28%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 357
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 275
- Emergent bilingual students
- 79
- Special education students
- 71
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 27
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 271
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 10%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 337 students in 2023–24.
- Latest available PEIMS enrollment
- 337
2023–24
- Change since 2021–22
- +27
Increase · +8.7%
Enrollment in 2023–24
- This school
- 337
- Selected comparison
- 657.3
| School year | Students enrolledBrule Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 310 | First available year | 657.9 |
| 2022–23 | 327 | Increase of 17 (5.5%) | 660.8 |
| 2023–24 | 337 | Increase of 10 (3.1%) | 657.3 |
| 2024–25 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2025–26 | Not reported | Not available | — |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 19
5.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 55
15.80 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 348
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 5.5%
- Selected comparison
- 13.3%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 15.8
- Selected comparison
- 32
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 315 | 17 | 5.4% | 20 | 6.35 | 8.9% | 17.8 |
| 2021–22 | 325 | 24 | 7.4% | 51 | 15.69 | 12.9% | 30.9 |
| 2022–23 | 356 | 54 | 15.2% | 125 | 35.11 | 13.6% | 33.7 |
| 2023–24 | 373 | 49 | 13.1% | 174 | 46.65 | 13.6% | 33.6 |
| 2024–25 | 348 | 19 | 5.5% | 55 | 15.80 | 13.3% | 32 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 19 | 5.5% | 55 | 15.80 | 13.3% | 32 |
| In-school suspensions | 19 | 5.5% | 55 | 15.80 | 11.7% | 23.4 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Brule Elem
- Parent district: Navasota ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $9,433
- Selected comparison
- $12,969
For 2025, TEA reported $9,433 per student for this campus, $20,591 per student for its parent district, Navasota ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Brule Elem | Parent district: Navasota ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,979 | $12,363 | $13,054 | $8,061 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,958 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,519 | $14,368 | $13,108 | $8,215 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,978 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $8,804 | $23,673 | $14,058 | $8,744 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $9,386 | $20,523 | $14,797 | $9,329 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,008 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $9,047 | $16,649 | $15,708 | $10,662 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,026 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $8,815 | $15,674 | $16,792 | $11,239 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,043 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $8,780 | $17,342 | $18,125 | $12,242 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,064 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $9,433 | $20,591 | $18,972 | $12,969 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $71,534+$4,770 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 22−21.7 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 16.4+2.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Brule Elem
- 1 to 5 years 8.7%
- 6 to 10 years 12.8%
- 11 to 20 years 43.6%
- 21 to 30 years 30.3%
- Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,090 reporting for every category shown · 2,090 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.8%
- 1 to 5 years 27.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15.1%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.7%
- 6 to 10 years 18.9%
- 11 to 20 years 27.6%
- 21 to 30 years 13.6%
- Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison average For Grimes County · 10 reporting for every category shown · 10 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.6%
- 1 to 5 years 22.5%
- 6 to 10 years 18.1%
- 11 to 20 years 33.7%
- 21 to 30 years 17.3%
- Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,507 reporting for every category shown · 3,507 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 25.3%
- 6 to 10 years 18.9%
- 11 to 20 years 28.9%
- 21 to 30 years 16.6%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classBrule Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 14.7 | 18 |
| Grade 1 | 19 | 18.2 |
| Grade 2 | 21 | 18.4 |
| Grade 3 | 15.9 | 18.8 |
| Grade 4 | 17.9 | 19 |
| Grade 5 | 18.3 | 20.1 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
21 measures
-
4of 10
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
5of 10
Attendance
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
5of 10
Per-student spending
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
6of 10
Math — Meets
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
6of 10
Science — Approaches
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 10
Reading — Approaches
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
7of 10
Math — Masters
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
8of 10
School Progress
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
8of 10
Relative Performance
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
8of 10
All Subjects — Approaches
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
8of 10
Reading — Masters
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
8of 10
Math — Approaches
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Overall score
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Student Achievement
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Academic Growth
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 10
All Subjects — Meets
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Reading — Meets
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Science — Meets
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
10of 10
Closing the Gaps
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
10of 10
All Subjects — Masters
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
10of 10
Science — Masters
Grimes County · of the 10 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 093904107.