Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Bridgeland HS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 3,732 students

Current score
93/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.9 ptsvs 90.1 average · 730 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
158 of 730tied with 93 others
A93

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 90.1 average for 730 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
89%vs 71.6% avg · +17.4 pts
Masters
49%vs 41% avg · +8 pts

Among 718 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
94%vs 67.2% avg · +26.8 pts
Masters
72%vs 40.8% avg · +31.2 pts

Among 674 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

93 +2.9 pts vs 90.1

  • 93 is 2.9 points above the 90.1 average among 730 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Bridgeland HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90.1 average for 730 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 158th of 730 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 93 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBridgeland HS 9088919393 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9390.1 730 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9390.3 724 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9189.3 707 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8889.6 690 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9090.5 675 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A−0.1 vs similar economic context · 718 reporting
  • School Progress88 B+1.7 vs similar economic context · 716 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps97 A+9.4 vs similar economic context · 713 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B−1.2 vs similar economic context · 710 reporting
  • Relative Performance88 B+9.0 vs similar economic context · 716 reporting
  • Bridgeland HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (730 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress88B2
Closing the Gaps97A—
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance88B2

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level97%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 718 reporting
  • Meets grade level89%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 718 reporting
  • Masters grade level49%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 718 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 718 reporting
  • Meets grade level89%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 718 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 718 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 716 reporting
  • Meets grade level78%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 716 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 716 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 674 reporting
  • Meets grade level94%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 674 reporting
  • Masters grade level72%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 674 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 reporting
  • Meets grade level93%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 reporting
  • Masters grade level73%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (730 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
97.2%+9.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 150 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.5%+10.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 150 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
98.1%+9.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 150 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.4%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
86.0%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria86.0%88.7%−2.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 144 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course73.3%67.7%+5.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA61.1%55.0%+6.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)40.1%32.6%+7.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course28.2%38.9%−10.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification29.2%30.6%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.2%0.3%−0.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree6.6%3.9%+2.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%9.5%−9.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness1.4%2.2%−0.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student2.8%5.7%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.5%2.0%−0.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
859

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
394

45.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
266

31.0% of graduates

Not trackable
199

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
859
Selected comparison
397.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 127 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
394
Selected comparison
188.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 127 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
45.9%
Selected comparison
50.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 127 rated schools reporting

−4.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
31.0%
Selected comparison
39.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 127 rated schools reporting

−8.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
23.2%
Selected comparison
9.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 127 rated schools reporting

+13.4 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. LONE STAR COLLEGE - CY-FAIR (000717)87
  2. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)54
  3. BLINN COLLEGE DISTRICT (003549)37

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
3,732
Economically disadvantaged
17.7%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.5%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.1%−9.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.6%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.4%+4.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Bridgeland HS

African American: 10.9%Hispanic: 23.1%White: 44%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 16.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.1%
  • African American 10.9%
  • Hispanic 23.1%
  • White 44%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 16.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 730 reporting for every category shown · 730 in full cohort

African American: 7.1%Hispanic: 22.6%White: 48.5%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 15.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.5%
  • African American 7.1%
  • Hispanic 22.6%
  • White 48.5%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 15.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
3,728
Economically disadvantaged students
661
Emergent bilingual students
129
Special education students
266

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
193
Students in TEA mobility denominator
3,810
TEA-published mobility rate
5.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 3,732 students in 2025–26, an increase of 25 (0.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
3,732

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+25

Increase · +0.7%

Change since 2021–22
+282

Increase · +8.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
3,732
Selected comparison
863.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 725 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Bridgeland HS
School yearStudents enrolledBridgeland HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 3,450 First available year 881.8
2022–23 3,544 Increase of 94 (2.7%) 896.1
2023–24 3,647 Increase of 103 (2.9%) 883.9
2024–25 3,707 Increase of 60 (1.6%) 873.1
2025–26 3,732 Increase of 25 (0.7%) 863.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
255

6.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
641

16.90 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
3,794

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
6.7%
Selected comparison
6.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 486 rated schools reporting

+0.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
16.9
Selected comparison
11.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 559 rated schools reporting

+5.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bridgeland HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 3,337 86 2.6% 168 5.03 4.7% 7.8
2021–22 3,516 309 8.8% 755 21.47 6.5% 12
2022–23 3,645 257 7.0% 665 18.24 6.6% 12.2
2023–24 3,713 203 5.5% 500 13.47 6.4% 12
2024–25 3,794 255 6.7% 641 16.90 6.2% 11.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bridgeland HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 255 6.7% 641 16.90 6.2% 11.5
In-school suspensions 232 6.1% 442 11.65 5.8% 9.2
Out-of-school suspensions 93 2.5% 123 3.24 2.9% 3.9
DAEP placements 68 1.8% 76 2.00 2.1% 2.4
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Bridgeland HS
  • Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$6,913
Selected comparison
$10,976

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 723 rated schools reporting

−$4,063 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $6,913 per student for this campus, $16,633 per student for its parent district, Cypress-Fairbanks ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBridgeland HSParent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,720$12,265$13,054$7,351 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 629 rated schools reporting
2019$6,722$12,730$13,108$7,431 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 646 rated schools reporting
2020$6,396$12,750$14,058$7,730 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 rated schools reporting
2021$6,460$14,470$14,797$8,279 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 664 rated schools reporting
2022$6,668$15,507$15,708$9,487 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 675 rated schools reporting
2023$6,904$15,990$16,792$9,985 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 691 rated schools reporting
2024$6,785$16,047$18,125$10,922 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 707 rated schools reporting
2025$6,913$16,633$18,972$10,976 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 723 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,112+$3,992 vs similar economic context
Teachers
224+168.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.7+1.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Bridgeland HS

Beginning: 12.4%1 to 5 years: 20.1%6 to 10 years: 21.5%11 to 20 years: 34%21 to 30 years: 11%Over 30 years: 1.1%
  • Beginning 12.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 20.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 34%
  • 21 to 30 years 11%
  • Over 30 years 1.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 730 reporting for every category shown · 730 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.4%1 to 5 years: 22.8%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 32.6%21 to 30 years: 17.2%Over 30 years: 2.8%
  • Beginning 4.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.2%
  • Over 30 years 2.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bridgeland HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBridgeland HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English22.218.1
Secondary languages other than English20.120.3
Secondary math23.418.2
Secondary science23.920.6
Secondary social studies24.720.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 2of 224

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 224

    Reading — Meets

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 3of 224

    Math — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 3

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 4of 224

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 224

    Reading — Masters

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 224

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 6of 224

    Science — Meets

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 224

    Science — Masters

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 224

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure

  • 8of 224

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 1

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

4 measures

  • 12of 224

    Math — Meets

    Similar size · of the 224 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 20of 802

    Science — Approaches

    Harris County · of the 802 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 23of 713

    Closing the Gaps

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 713 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 363of 7,254

    Reading — Approaches

    Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 108

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101907016.