+2.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 2,143 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
919 of 2,143tied with 96 others
Score vs region
±0.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
195 of 352tied with 11 others
Score vs county
+3.3 ptsvs 76.7 average · 30 rated schools in Angelina County
Angelina County placement
13 of 30tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
−0.1 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,354 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,280 of 4,354tied with 162 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 2,143 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is level with the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 76.7 average for 30 rated schools in Angelina County.The current score is level with the 80.1 average for 4,354 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
48%vs 42.5% avg · +5.5 pts
Masters
30%vs 16.7% avg · +13.3 pts
Among 1,981 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Brandon Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 2,143 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 919th of 2,143 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 96 others).
Brandon Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 195th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 11 others).
Brandon Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 76.7 average for 30 rated schools in Angelina County. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 13th of 30 rated schools in Angelina County (tied with 2 others).
Brandon Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.1 average for 4,354 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,280th of 4,354 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 162 others).
Brandon Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement76 C+3.3 vs similar economic context · 1,981 reporting
School Progress83 B+4.0 vs similar economic context · 1,975 reporting
Closing the Gaps72 C−2.9 vs similar economic context · 1,961 reporting
Academic Growth75 C+2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,925 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,975 reporting
Brandon Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,143 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
76
C
4
School Progress
83
B
7
Closing the Gaps
72
C
8
Academic Growth
75
C
5
Relative Performance
83
B
7
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so
Student Achievement (76) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level65%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 reporting
Meets grade level48%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 reporting
Masters grade level30%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 reporting
Meets grade level50%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 reporting
Masters grade level31%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level61%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 reporting
Meets grade level47%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 reporting
Masters grade level29%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level61%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting
Meets grade level43%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting
Masters grade level27%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,143 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
438
Economically disadvantaged
79.2%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.1%−20.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
32.9%+14.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.6%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Brandon Elem
African American 36.8%
Hispanic 25.8%
White 30.1%
Asian 1.8%
Two or More Races 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,143 reporting for every category shown · 2,143 in full cohort
African American 14%
Hispanic 66.7%
White 14.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Angelina County · 30 reporting for every category shown · 30 in full cohort
African American 15.5%
Hispanic 33.2%
White 46.6%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,354 reporting for every category shown · 4,354 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 25.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
438
Economically disadvantaged students
347
Emergent bilingual students
31
Special education students
144
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
68
Students in TEA mobility denominator
435
TEA-published mobility rate
15.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 438 students in 2025–26, an increase of 52 (13.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
438
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+52
Increase · +13.5%
Change since 2021–22
+59
Increase · +15.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
438
Selected comparison
635
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,112 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Brandon Elem
School year
Students enrolledBrandon Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
379
First available year
657.7
2022–23
394
Increase of 15 (4.0%)
661.6
2023–24
377
Decrease of 17 (4.3%)
656.6
2024–25
386
Increase of 9 (2.4%)
653.2
2025–26
438
Increase of 52 (13.5%)
635
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
59
13.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
134
31.16 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
430
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
13.7%
Selected comparison
13.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,590 rated schools reporting
+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
31.16
Selected comparison
32.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,695 rated schools reporting
−1.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Brandon Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
415
20
4.8%
38
9.16
8.5%
16.9
2021–22
410
26
6.3%
43
10.49
12.9%
31.2
2022–23
414
44
10.6%
96
23.19
13.8%
34.3
2023–24
405
37
9.1%
86
21.23
13.7%
34.2
2024–25
430
59
13.7%
134
31.16
13.4%
32.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Brandon Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
59
13.7%
134
31.16
13.4%
32.7
In-school suspensions
54
12.6%
100
23.26
11.8%
23.8
Out-of-school suspensions
18
4.2%
27
6.28
8.2%
12.9
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Brandon Elem
Parent district: Lufkin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,365
Selected comparison
$13,048
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,130 rated schools reporting
−$4,683 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,365 per student for this campus, $14,269 per student for its parent district, Lufkin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Brandon Elem
Parent district: Lufkin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,328
$10,430
$13,054
$8,105
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,013 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,632
$11,552
$13,108
$8,239
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,033 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,419
$13,250
$14,058
$8,752
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,144
$18,110
$14,797
$9,387
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,061 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,682
$17,861
$15,708
$10,770
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,079 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,071
$18,261
$16,792
$11,257
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,098 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,249
$15,650
$18,125
$12,264
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,115 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,365
$14,269
$18,972
$13,048
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,130 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$66,548−$430 vs similar economic context
Teachers
31−12.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.1+0.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Brandon Elem
Beginning 25.1%
1 to 5 years 13.2%
6 to 10 years 3.2%
11 to 20 years 30.2%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 12.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,143 reporting for every category shown · 2,143 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Angelina County · 30 reporting for every category shown · 30 in full cohort
Beginning 9.5%
1 to 5 years 21.4%
6 to 10 years 21.9%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 13.8%
Over 30 years 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,354 reporting for every category shown · 4,354 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.9%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Brandon Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBrandon Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 3
17.6
18.9
Grade 4
17.6
19
Grade 5
18.4
20
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
2of 29
Attendance
Angelina County · of the 29 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 23
All Subjects — Masters
Angelina County · of the 23 that report this measure
2of 22
Reading — Masters
Angelina County · of the 22 that report this measure
3of 22
Math — Masters
Angelina County · of the 22 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
5of 20
Science — Masters
Angelina County · of the 20 that report this measure
6of 22
Math — Meets
Angelina County · of the 22 that report this measure
7of 29
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Angelina County · of the 29 that report this measure
9of 23
All Subjects — Meets
Angelina County · of the 23 that report this measure
9of 22
School Progress
Angelina County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 22
Relative Performance
Angelina County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 20
Academic Growth
Angelina County · of the 20 that report this measure
10of 22
Reading — Meets
Angelina County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 003903121.