Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Bradfield Elem

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 596 students

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
−4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−1.2 ptsvs 92.2 average · 250 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
173 of 250tied with 25 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 92.2 average for 250 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
85%vs 78.3% avg · +6.7 pts
Masters
60%vs 49.4% avg · +10.6 pts

Among 245 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
79%vs 75.3% avg · +3.7 pts
Masters
53%vs 45.5% avg · +7.5 pts

Among 244 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
90%vs 82.6% avg · +7.4 pts
Masters
68%vs 52.9% avg · +15.1 pts

Among 245 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Bradfield Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 92.2 average for 250 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 173rd of 250 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 25 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBradfield Elem 9594959691 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9192.2 250 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9692.7 242 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9591.8 239 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9492.2 230 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9592.7 225 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement95 A+1.8 vs similar economic context · 245 reporting
  • School Progress87 B−1.5 vs similar economic context · 244 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps80 B−10.3 vs similar economic context · 242 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B−0.1 vs similar economic context · 242 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+7.0 vs similar economic context · 244 reporting
  • Bradfield Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (250 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement95A—
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps80B10
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 10 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level95%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 reporting
  • Meets grade level85%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 reporting
  • Masters grade level60%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 reporting
  • Meets grade level90%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 reporting
  • Masters grade level68%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting
  • Masters grade level53%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (250 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
596
Economically disadvantaged
0.8%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.2%−9.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.5%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.7%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Bradfield Elem

African American: 1.2%Hispanic: 6%White: 82.2%American Indian: 0.7%Asian: 5.5%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 1.2%
  • Hispanic 6%
  • White 82.2%
  • American Indian 0.7%
  • Asian 5.5%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 250 reporting for every category shown · 250 in full cohort

African American: 4.1%Hispanic: 14.7%White: 48.9%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 25.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.8%
  • African American 4.1%
  • Hispanic 14.7%
  • White 48.9%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 25.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
596
Economically disadvantaged students
5
Emergent bilingual students
7
Special education students
122

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
10
Students in TEA mobility denominator
423
TEA-published mobility rate
2.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 596 students in 2025–26, an increase of 18 (3.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
596

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+18

Increase · +3.1%

Change since 2021–22
+43

Increase · +7.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
596
Selected comparison
844.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Bradfield Elem
School yearStudents enrolledBradfield ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 553 First available year 857.8
2022–23 559 Increase of 6 (1.1%) 872.5
2023–24 564 Increase of 5 (0.9%) 857.6
2024–25 578 Increase of 14 (2.5%) 854.1
2025–26 596 Increase of 18 (3.1%) 844.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
587

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bradfield Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 561 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 570 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 572 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 569 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 587 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bradfield Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$18k$29k20182020202220242025
  • Bradfield Elem
  • Parent district: Highland Park ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,095
Selected comparison
$10,641

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 241 rated schools reporting

+$454 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,095 per student for this campus, $22,414 per student for its parent district, Highland Park ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBradfield ElemParent district: Highland Park ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,048$24,340$13,054$7,143 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 201 rated schools reporting
2019$8,846$27,242$13,108$7,287 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 rated schools reporting
2020$9,190$26,719$14,058$7,573 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 214 rated schools reporting
2021$9,303$18,178$14,797$8,028 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 222 rated schools reporting
2022$9,923$17,775$15,708$9,183 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 225 rated schools reporting
2023$9,653$18,180$16,792$9,094 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 229 rated schools reporting
2024$10,873$20,398$18,125$10,054 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 238 rated schools reporting
2025$11,095$22,414$18,972$10,641 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 241 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,966+$3,429 vs similar economic context
Teachers
41−14.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.6−0.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Bradfield Elem

Beginning: 2.5%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 24.8%21 to 30 years: 22.1%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 2.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 24.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.1%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 250 reporting for every category shown · 250 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.1%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 31.2%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 2.4%
  • Beginning 4.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 2.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bradfield Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBradfield Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten20.819
Grade 121.819.3
Grade 218.919.7
Grade 318.321.2
Grade 419.220.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

10 measures

  • 17of 549

    Reading — Masters

    Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure

  • 18of 549

    All Subjects — Masters

    Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 20of 549

    Math — Masters

    Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 23of 549

    Reading — Approaches

    Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 9

  • 26of 549

    Reading — Meets

    Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 28of 549

    All Subjects — Meets

    Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 29of 549

    Math — Meets

    Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 49of 1,110

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,110 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 117of 4,509

    Student Achievement

    Similar size · of the 4,509 that report this measure · tied with 66

  • 170of 4,509

    Math — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 4,509 that report this measure · tied with 50

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057911102.