Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Boswell HS

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 2,409 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.8 ptsvs 83.2 average · 1,509 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
603 of 1,509tied with 69 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.2 average for 1,509 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 3 points

84 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 5 points above the 82 average among 1,464 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
71%vs 54.9% avg · +16.1 pts
Masters
29%vs 27% avg · +2 pts

Among 1,357 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

86 +2.8 pts vs 83.2

  • 86 is 2.8 points above the 83.2 average among 1,509 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Boswell HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.2 average for 1,509 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 603rd of 1,509 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 69 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBoswell HS 8684848986 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8683.2 1,509 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8983.5 1,478 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8481.5 1,452 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8482.1 1,437 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8684.3 1,419 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement88 B+4.7 vs similar economic context · 1,467 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,464 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps82 B+1.5 vs similar economic context · 1,455 reporting
  • Academic Growth67 D−9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,438 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,464 reporting
  • Boswell HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,509 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement88B2
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps82B8
Academic Growth67D3
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (88), so School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level83%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,467 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,466 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,466 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,466 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,462 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,462 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,462 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 756 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 756 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 756 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,509 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
98.6%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.5%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
98.0%+5.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 417 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.3%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 420 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
92.0%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria92.0%88.6%+3.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 426 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course77.3%59.7%+17.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA33.9%31.8%+2.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)35.1%12.0%+23.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course11.6%35.2%−23.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification18.3%38.3%−20.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.5%−1.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.1%−4.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit14.6%5.2%+9.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness4.0%2.9%+1.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.0%7.4%−3.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.5%3.3%+0.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
533

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
240

45.0% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
278

52.2% of graduates

Not trackable
15

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
533
Selected comparison
222.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
240
Selected comparison
98.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
45.0%
Selected comparison
47.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

−2.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
52.2%
Selected comparison
48.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

+3.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
2.8%
Selected comparison
4.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 rated schools reporting

−1.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE DIST (003626)92
  2. TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY (003631)27
  3. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)20

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
2,409
Economically disadvantaged
44.6%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.4%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.1%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.8%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
22.8%+9.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Boswell HS

African American: 18.2%Hispanic: 41.3%White: 30.2%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 5.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 18.2%
  • Hispanic 41.3%
  • White 30.2%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 5.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,509 reporting for every category shown · 1,509 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 38%White: 44.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 38%
  • White 44.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
2,404
Economically disadvantaged students
1,071
Emergent bilingual students
249
Special education students
339

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
369
Students in TEA mobility denominator
2,643
TEA-published mobility rate
14%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 2,409 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 36 (1.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
2,409

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−36

Decrease · −1.5%

Change since 2021–22
0

No change

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
2,409
Selected comparison
680.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,471 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Boswell HS
School yearStudents enrolledBoswell HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 2,409 First available year 677.5
2022–23 2,547 Increase of 138 (5.7%) 683.3
2023–24 2,683 Increase of 136 (5.3%) 684
2024–25 2,445 Decrease of 238 (8.9%) 680.1
2025–26 2,409 Decrease of 36 (1.5%) 680.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
309

12.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
755

29.55 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
2,555

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
12.1%
Selected comparison
11.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,161 rated schools reporting

+0.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
29.55
Selected comparison
24.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,250 rated schools reporting

+4.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Boswell HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 2,281 223 9.8% 386 16.92 9.4% 17.8
2021–22 2,496 457 18.3% 1,080 43.27 11.4% 24.5
2022–23 2,670 485 18.2% 1,418 53.11 11.8% 25.7
2023–24 2,802 506 18.1% 1,351 48.22 11.7% 26.3
2024–25 2,555 309 12.1% 755 29.55 11.4% 24.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Boswell HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 309 12.1% 755 29.55 11.4% 24.7
In-school suspensions 225 8.8% 477 18.67 10.2% 19
Out-of-school suspensions 151 5.9% 221 8.65 5.5% 7.7
DAEP placements 47 1.8% 54 2.11 4.2% 4.9
Mandatory DAEP placements 36 1.4% 40 1.57 3.2% 3.7
Discretionary DAEP placements 14 0.6% 14 0.55 2.4% 2.7
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$15k$25k20182020202220242025
  • Boswell HS
  • Parent district: Eagle Mt-Saginaw ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,544
Selected comparison
$12,061

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 rated schools reporting

−$4,517 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,544 per student for this campus, $19,796 per student for its parent district, Eagle Mt-Saginaw ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBoswell HSParent district: Eagle Mt-Saginaw ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,669$12,652$13,054$7,814 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 rated schools reporting
2019$7,228$14,289$13,108$8,019 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,378 rated schools reporting
2020$7,280$14,800$14,058$8,456 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,387 rated schools reporting
2021$7,537$17,418$14,797$8,871 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,407 rated schools reporting
2022$10,733$17,856$15,708$10,242 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 rated schools reporting
2023$7,415$23,355$16,792$10,639 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,437 rated schools reporting
2024$7,117$20,348$18,125$11,680 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,453 rated schools reporting
2025$7,544$19,796$18,972$12,061 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,963+$2,762 vs similar economic context
Teachers
133+88.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.1−2.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Boswell HS

Beginning: 3.6%1 to 5 years: 22.1%6 to 10 years: 18.5%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 22.4%Over 30 years: 6.3%
  • Beginning 3.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.4%
  • Over 30 years 6.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,509 reporting for every category shown · 1,509 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.4%1 to 5 years: 23.8%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.3%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 5.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Boswell HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBoswell HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English20.315.4
Secondary languages other than English22.317.8
Secondary math27.416.4
Secondary science26.217.9
Secondary social studies2617.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220918001.