Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Borchert Loop ElemA90vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Borchert Loop Elem
Caldwell County · Region 13: Austin · 432 students
Current score
90/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+11.0 ptsvs 79 average · 2,038 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
243 of 2,038tied with 62 others
Score vs region
+10.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin
Region 13: Austin placement
113 of 519tied with 20 others
Score vs county
+13.3 ptsvs 76.7 average · 15 rated schools in Caldwell County
Caldwell County placement
2 of 15among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+9.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,303 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
730 of 4,303tied with 172 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
The current score is above the 79 average for 2,038 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin.The current score is above the 76.7 average for 15 rated schools in Caldwell County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,303 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
49%vs 45.5% avg · +3.5 pts
Masters
20%vs 18.1% avg · +1.9 pts
Among 1,906 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Borchert Loop Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79 average for 2,038 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 243rd of 2,038 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 62 others).
Borchert Loop Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 113th of 519 rated schools in Region 13: Austin (tied with 20 others).
Borchert Loop Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 76.7 average for 15 rated schools in Caldwell County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 2nd of 15 rated schools in Caldwell County.
Borchert Loop Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,303 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 730th of 4,303 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 172 others).
Borchert Loop Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement76 C+0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,906 reporting
School Progress91 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 1,899 reporting
Closing the Gaps86 B+9.9 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
Academic Growth91 A+17.8 vs similar economic context · 1,843 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 1,899 reporting
Borchert Loop Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,038 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
76
C
4
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
86
B
4
Academic Growth
91
A
—
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (91), so
Student Achievement (76) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level75%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting
Meets grade level49%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting
Masters grade level20%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 reporting
Meets grade level56%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 reporting
Masters grade level23%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Meets grade level49%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Masters grade level21%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level71%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 reporting
Meets grade level27%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 reporting
Masters grade level11%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,038 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
432
Economically disadvantaged
71.5%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
34.5%+13.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.0%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—
Student demographics
Borchert Loop Elem
African American 0.7%
Hispanic 82.9%
White 14.8%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting for every category shown · 2,038 in full cohort
African American 12.5%
Hispanic 58.3%
White 23.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 49.9%
White 31.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Caldwell County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
African American 3.2%
Hispanic 78.2%
White 16.1%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,303 reporting for every category shown · 4,303 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 25.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
432
Economically disadvantaged students
309
Emergent bilingual students
149
Special education students
69
TEA context labels
New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Teachers
Average salary
$63,960−$2,468 vs similar economic context
Teachers
28−15.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.6+1.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Borchert Loop Elem
Beginning 3.6%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 39.9%
11 to 20 years 15.9%
21 to 30 years 5.1%
Over 30 years 10.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting for every category shown · 2,038 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 14.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Caldwell County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
Beginning 10.1%
1 to 5 years 32.5%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 24.4%
21 to 30 years 10%
Over 30 years 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,303 reporting for every category shown · 4,303 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.8%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
9 measures
2of 15
Overall score
Caldwell County · of the 15 that report this measure
2of 14
School Progress
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
2of 14
Closing the Gaps
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
2of 14
Academic Growth
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
2of 14
Reading — Approaches
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
2of 14
Math — Masters
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 14
All Subjects — Meets
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
3of 14
Reading — Meets
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
3of 14
Math — Meets
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
9 measures
4of 14
All Subjects — Approaches
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 14
All Subjects — Masters
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
5of 14
Student Achievement
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 14
Reading — Masters
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
5of 14
Math — Approaches
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
7of 14
Relative Performance
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
7of 14
Science — Approaches
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 14
Science — Masters
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
8of 14
Science — Meets
Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 028902107.