Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Borchert Loop Elem

Caldwell County · Region 13: Austin · 432 students

Current score
90/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+11.0 ptsvs 79 average · 2,038 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
243 of 2,038tied with 62 others
A90

At a glance

The current score is above the 79 average for 2,038 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
49%vs 45.5% avg · +3.5 pts
Masters
20%vs 18.1% avg · +1.9 pts

Among 1,906 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
49%vs 40.3% avg · +8.7 pts
Masters
21%vs 15.2% avg · +5.8 pts

Among 1,895 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
56%vs 50.3% avg · +5.7 pts
Masters
23%vs 19.7% avg · +3.3 pts

Among 1,904 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Borchert Loop Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79 average for 2,038 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 243rd of 2,038 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 62 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 90 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9079.0 2,038 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement76 C+0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,906 reporting
  • School Progress91 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 1,899 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B+9.9 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
  • Academic Growth91 A+17.8 vs similar economic context · 1,843 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 1,899 reporting
  • Borchert Loop Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,038 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement76C4
School Progress91A—
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth91A—
Relative Performance81B9

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (91), so Student Achievement (76) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,038 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
432
Economically disadvantaged
71.5%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
34.5%+13.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.0%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Borchert Loop Elem

African American: 0.7%Hispanic: 82.9%White: 14.8%Asian: 0.2%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 0.7%
  • Hispanic 82.9%
  • White 14.8%
  • Asian 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting for every category shown · 2,038 in full cohort

African American: 12.5%Hispanic: 58.3%White: 23.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.3%
  • African American 12.5%
  • Hispanic 58.3%
  • White 23.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
432
Economically disadvantaged students
309
Emergent bilingual students
149
Special education students
69

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$63,960−$2,468 vs similar economic context
Teachers
28−15.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.6+1.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Borchert Loop Elem

Beginning: 3.6%1 to 5 years: 24.6%6 to 10 years: 39.9%11 to 20 years: 15.9%21 to 30 years: 5.1%Over 30 years: 10.9%
  • Beginning 3.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 39.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 5.1%
  • Over 30 years 10.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting for every category shown · 2,038 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.4%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

9 measures

  • 2of 15

    Overall score

    Caldwell County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    School Progress

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    Closing the Gaps

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    Academic Growth

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    Reading — Approaches

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    Math — Masters

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 14

    All Subjects — Meets

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 3of 14

    Reading — Meets

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 3of 14

    Math — Meets

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

9 measures

  • 4of 14

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 14

    All Subjects — Masters

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 5of 14

    Student Achievement

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 14

    Reading — Masters

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 5of 14

    Math — Approaches

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 7of 14

    Relative Performance

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 7of 14

    Science — Approaches

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 14

    Science — Masters

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Science — Meets

    Caldwell County · of the 14 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 028902107.