+2.2 ptsvs 90.8 average · 666 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
172 of 666tied with 98 others
Score vs region
+10.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
109 of 1,157tied with 51 others
Score vs county
+6.6 ptsvs 86.4 average · 307 rated schools in Collin County
Collin County placement
44 of 307tied with 30 others
Score vs similar-size group
+12.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 4,704 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
267 of 4,704tied with 131 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 98 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 90.8 average for 666 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County.The current score is above the 80.3 average for 4,704 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
84%vs 73.6% avg · +10.4 pts
Masters
57%vs 43.6% avg · +13.4 pts
Among 656 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Borchardt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90.8 average for 666 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 172nd of 666 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 98 others).
Borchardt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 109th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 51 others).
Borchardt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 44th of 307 rated schools in Collin County (tied with 30 others).
Borchardt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 4,704 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 267th of 4,704 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 131 others).
Borchardt Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 98 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement95 A+3.2 vs similar economic context · 656 reporting
School Progress95 A+7.9 vs similar economic context · 654 reporting
Closing the Gaps88 B−0.4 vs similar economic context · 652 reporting
Academic Growth95 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 651 reporting
Relative Performance87 B+8.3 vs similar economic context · 654 reporting
Borchardt Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (666 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
95
A
—
School Progress
95
A
—
Closing the Gaps
88
B
2
Academic Growth
95
A
—
Relative Performance
87
B
3
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level93%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
Meets grade level84%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
Masters grade level57%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
Meets grade level85%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
Masters grade level58%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 654 reporting
Meets grade level84%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 654 reporting
Masters grade level58%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 654 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 616 reporting
Meets grade level79%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 616 reporting
Masters grade level52%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 616 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (666 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
591
Economically disadvantaged
13.7%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
32.0%+21.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.1%−6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.7%−1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Borchardt Elem
African American 10.5%
Hispanic 2.5%
White 8.3%
American Indian 1.5%
Asian 72.9%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 666 reporting for every category shown · 666 in full cohort
African American 6.3%
Hispanic 20.4%
White 48%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 19.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
African American 13.7%
Hispanic 22.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 26.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,704 reporting for every category shown · 4,704 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
591
Economically disadvantaged students
81
Emergent bilingual students
189
Special education students
54
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
83
Students in TEA mobility denominator
627
TEA-published mobility rate
13.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 591 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 75 (11.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
591
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−75
Decrease · −11.3%
Change since 2021–22
−136
Decrease · −18.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
591
Selected comparison
868.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 662 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Borchardt Elem
School year
Students enrolledBorchardt Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
727
First available year
883.2
2022–23
684
Decrease of 43 (5.9%)
900.8
2023–24
706
Increase of 22 (3.2%)
885.2
2024–25
666
Decrease of 40 (5.7%)
878.7
2025–26
591
Decrease of 75 (11.3%)
868.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
720
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Borchardt Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
794
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
774
Suppressed
—
18
2.33
—
10
2022–23
785
15
1.9%
16
2.04
5.9%
10.2
2023–24
772
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
720
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Borchardt Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Borchardt Elem
Parent district: Frisco ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$6,918
Selected comparison
$10,884
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 rated schools reporting
−$3,966 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $6,918 per student for this campus, $15,444 per student for its parent district, Frisco ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Borchardt Elem
Parent district: Frisco ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,567
$11,596
$13,054
$7,315
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 568 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,543
$11,635
$13,108
$7,410
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 585 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,292
$13,490
$14,058
$7,719
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 599 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,218
$14,862
$14,797
$8,299
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 608 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,332
$14,644
$15,708
$9,522
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 617 rated schools reporting
2023
$6,446
$15,227
$16,792
$9,696
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 627 rated schools reporting
2024
$6,519
$14,358
$18,125
$10,781
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 644 rated schools reporting
2025
$6,918
$15,444
$18,972
$10,884
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$66,932−$2,381 vs similar economic context
Teachers
35−20.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.7+1.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Borchardt Elem
Beginning 15%
1 to 5 years 55.8%
6 to 10 years 16.7%
11 to 20 years 9.6%
21 to 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 666 reporting for every category shown · 666 in full cohort
Beginning 4.3%
1 to 5 years 23.2%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 32.5%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 29.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,704 reporting for every category shown · 4,704 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Borchardt Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBorchardt Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.7
18.8
Grade 1
21.7
19.1
Grade 2
20.5
19.6
Grade 3
19.2
21.4
Grade 4
21.6
20.4
Grade 5
21.9
22.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
4of 289
Academic Growth
Collin County · of the 289 that report this measure · tied with 5
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
13 measures
17of 292
Math — Masters
Collin County · of the 292 that report this measure · tied with 4
30of 1,106
School Progress
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 19
34of 1,106
Math — Meets
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 3
39of 1,110
All Subjects — Masters
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,110 that report this measure · tied with 2
58of 1,110
All Subjects — Meets
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,110 that report this measure · tied with 5
118of 4,522
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 4,522 that report this measure · tied with 66
148of 4,522
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 4,522 that report this measure · tied with 15
164of 4,522
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 4,522 that report this measure · tied with 23
172of 4,129
Science — Masters
Similar size · of the 4,129 that report this measure · tied with 10
196of 4,522
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,522 that report this measure · tied with 48
207of 4,129
Science — Meets
Similar size · of the 4,129 that report this measure · tied with 18
209of 4,522
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,522 that report this measure · tied with 69
222of 4,522
Math — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,522 that report this measure · tied with 56
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043905109.