Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Bonnie Holland Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 678 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
94/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.3 ptsvs 88.7 average · 875 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
84 of 875tied with 61 others
A94

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 88.7 average for 875 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
79%vs 67.7% avg · +11.3 pts
Masters
56%vs 36.1% avg · +19.9 pts

Among 859 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
76%vs 62.5% avg · +13.5 pts
Masters
50%vs 30.9% avg · +19.1 pts

Among 857 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
83%vs 72% avg · +11 pts
Masters
64%vs 37.7% avg · +26.3 pts

Among 859 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Bonnie Holland Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.7 average for 875 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 84th of 875 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 61 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBonnie Holland Elem 9391929594 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9488.7 875 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9588.7 867 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9287.4 855 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9187.7 839 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9388.8 822 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+4.5 vs similar economic context · 859 reporting
  • School Progress94 A+8.8 vs similar economic context · 857 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps93 A+6.8 vs similar economic context · 853 reporting
  • Academic Growth94 A+11.9 vs similar economic context · 846 reporting
  • Relative Performance90 A+10.0 vs similar economic context · 857 reporting
  • Bonnie Holland Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (875 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress94A—
Closing the Gaps93A—
Academic Growth94A—
Relative Performance90A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level92%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 859 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 859 reporting
  • Masters grade level56%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 859 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 859 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 859 reporting
  • Masters grade level64%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 859 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 857 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 857 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 857 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 789 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 789 reporting
  • Masters grade level51%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 789 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (875 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
678
Economically disadvantaged
24.6%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
44.0%+34.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.8%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.5%−4.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Bonnie Holland Elem

African American: 7.7%Hispanic: 22.9%White: 22.3%Asian: 41.3%Two or More Races: 5.9%
  • African American 7.7%
  • Hispanic 22.9%
  • White 22.3%
  • Asian 41.3%
  • Two or More Races 5.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 875 reporting for every category shown · 875 in full cohort

African American: 8.4%Hispanic: 27.2%White: 48.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 10.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.1%
  • African American 8.4%
  • Hispanic 27.2%
  • White 48.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 10.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
678
Economically disadvantaged students
167
Emergent bilingual students
298
Special education students
134

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
72
Students in TEA mobility denominator
688
TEA-published mobility rate
10.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 678 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 106 (13.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
678

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−106

Decrease · −13.5%

Change since 2021–22
−155

Decrease · −18.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
678
Selected comparison
844.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 871 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Bonnie Holland Elem
School yearStudents enrolledBonnie Holland ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 833 First available year 859.9
2022–23 862 Increase of 29 (3.5%) 862.7
2023–24 805 Decrease of 57 (6.6%) 857.5
2024–25 784 Decrease of 21 (2.6%) 854
2025–26 678 Decrease of 106 (13.5%) 844.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
826

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bonnie Holland Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 974 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 926 Suppressed — 10 1.08 — 16
2022–23 934 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 883 Suppressed — 15 1.70 — 16.1
2024–25 826 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bonnie Holland Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Bonnie Holland Elem
  • Parent district: Katy ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,643
Selected comparison
$11,035

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 rated schools reporting

+$608 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,643 per student for this campus, $17,981 per student for its parent district, Katy ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBonnie Holland ElemParent district: Katy ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,634$14,611$13,054$7,496 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 774 rated schools reporting
2019$6,497$14,868$13,108$7,563 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 787 rated schools reporting
2020$7,163$15,576$14,058$7,894 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 798 rated schools reporting
2021$8,180$13,959$14,797$8,356 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 805 rated schools reporting
2022$9,849$15,755$15,708$9,361 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 821 rated schools reporting
2023$9,640$17,477$16,792$9,966 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 840 rated schools reporting
2024$11,467$16,789$18,125$10,989 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 854 rated schools reporting
2025$11,643$17,981$18,972$11,035 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,595+$5,028 vs similar economic context
Teachers
56+1.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.2−2.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Bonnie Holland Elem

Beginning: 5.4%1 to 5 years: 19.8%6 to 10 years: 18%11 to 20 years: 41.4%21 to 30 years: 9.9%Over 30 years: 5.4%
  • Beginning 5.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 19.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 18%
  • 11 to 20 years 41.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.9%
  • Over 30 years 5.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 875 reporting for every category shown · 875 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.7%1 to 5 years: 22.5%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.1%
  • Beginning 4.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bonnie Holland Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBonnie Holland Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten21.318.7
Grade 120.819.1
Grade 229.319.7
Grade 324.620.7
Grade 425.120.1
Grade 533.321.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

11 measures

  • 14of 869

    Academic Growth

    Harris County · of the 869 that report this measure · tied with 15

  • 29of 874

    Reading — Masters

    Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 39of 874

    All Subjects — Masters

    Harris County · of the 874 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 44of 873

    Math — Masters

    Harris County · of the 873 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 115of 4,292

    School Progress

    Similar size · of the 4,292 that report this measure · tied with 64

  • 190of 3,941

    Science — Masters

    Similar size · of the 3,941 that report this measure · tied with 21

  • 191of 4,335

    Attendance

    Similar size · of the 4,335 that report this measure · tied with 43

  • 191of 4,292

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar size · of the 4,292 that report this measure · tied with 28

  • 202of 4,292

    Reading — Meets

    Similar size · of the 4,292 that report this measure · tied with 35

  • 227of 4,292

    Math — Meets

    Similar size · of the 4,292 that report this measure · tied with 24

  • 229of 4,292

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 4,292 that report this measure · tied with 59

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101914131.