Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Bluebonnet Elem

Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 625 students

Current score
96/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.4 ptsvs 91.6 average · 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
18 of 444tied with 23 others
A96

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.6 average for 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
85%vs 76.3% avg · +8.7 pts
Masters
63%vs 46.8% avg · +16.2 pts

Among 436 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
83%vs 72.9% avg · +10.1 pts
Masters
59%vs 42.5% avg · +16.5 pts

Among 434 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
86%vs 80.8% avg · +5.2 pts
Masters
65%vs 50% avg · +15 pts

Among 436 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Bluebonnet Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.6 average for 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 18th of 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 23 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBluebonnet Elem 9595969696 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9691.6 444 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9692.1 436 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9691.2 425 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9591.6 413 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9592.2 405 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement95 A+2.3 vs similar economic context · 436 reporting
  • School Progress96 A+8.2 vs similar economic context · 434 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps96 A+6.8 vs similar economic context · 431 reporting
  • Academic Growth96 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 431 reporting
  • Relative Performance86 B+7.9 vs similar economic context · 434 reporting
  • Bluebonnet Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (444 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement95A—
School Progress96A—
Closing the Gaps96A—
Academic Growth96A—
Relative Performance86B4

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (96), so Student Achievement (95) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level95%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Meets grade level85%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Masters grade level63%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Meets grade level86%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Masters grade level65%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
  • Masters grade level59%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Meets grade level87%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Masters grade level66%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (444 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
625
Economically disadvantaged
6.6%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
24.8%+14.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.4%−2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.3%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.8%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Bluebonnet Elem

African American: 4.5%Hispanic: 9.7%White: 28.7%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 50.8%Two or More Races: 5.6%
  • African American 4.5%
  • Hispanic 9.7%
  • White 28.7%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 50.8%
  • Two or More Races 5.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 reporting for every category shown · 444 in full cohort

African American: 4.8%Hispanic: 17.4%White: 48.5%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 23.1%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 4.8%
  • Hispanic 17.4%
  • White 48.5%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 23.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
620
Economically disadvantaged students
41
Emergent bilingual students
154
Special education students
77

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
44
Students in TEA mobility denominator
611
TEA-published mobility rate
7.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 625 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 43 (6.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
625

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−43

Decrease · −6.4%

Change since 2021–22
+69

Increase · +12.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
625
Selected comparison
872.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 439 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Bluebonnet Elem
School yearStudents enrolledBluebonnet ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 556 First available year 882.1
2022–23 632 Increase of 76 (13.7%) 902.5
2023–24 672 Increase of 40 (6.3%) 890.9
2024–25 668 Decrease of 4 (0.6%) 883.7
2025–26 625 Decrease of 43 (6.4%) 872.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15

2.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
19

2.75 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
691

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.2%
Selected comparison
4.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 rated schools reporting

−2.5 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
2.75
Selected comparison
7.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated schools reporting

−5.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bluebonnet Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 541 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 624 Suppressed — 15 2.40 — 7.8
2022–23 674 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 706 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 691 15 2.2% 19 2.75 4.7% 7.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bluebonnet Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 15 2.2% 19 2.75 4.7% 7.7
In-school suspensions 15 2.2% 19 2.75 4.4% 6.2
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$21k20182020202220242025
  • Bluebonnet Elem
  • Parent district: Lewisville ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,087
Selected comparison
$10,821

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 435 rated schools reporting

−$3,734 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,087 per student for this campus, $19,986 per student for its parent district, Lewisville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBluebonnet ElemParent district: Lewisville ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,111$13,687$13,054$7,204 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 rated schools reporting
2019$6,803$15,471$13,108$7,342 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 378 rated schools reporting
2020$6,547$18,091$14,058$7,641 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 388 rated schools reporting
2021$7,331$17,403$14,797$8,261 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 398 rated schools reporting
2022$18,341$16,558$15,708$9,493 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
2023$11,063$17,007$16,792$9,527 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 rated schools reporting
2024$9,179$18,110$18,125$10,199 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 425 rated schools reporting
2025$7,087$19,986$18,972$10,821 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 435 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,791+$1,289 vs similar economic context
Teachers
40−16.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.4+0.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Bluebonnet Elem

Beginning: 2.5%1 to 5 years: 20.2%6 to 10 years: 21.2%11 to 20 years: 28.9%21 to 30 years: 22.4%Over 30 years: 5%
  • Beginning 2.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 20.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.4%
  • Over 30 years 5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 reporting for every category shown · 444 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 23.8%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 31.8%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 2.5%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bluebonnet Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBluebonnet Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2019
Grade 121.819.3
Grade 219.419.7
Grade 319.821.6
Grade 421.420.4
Grade 52222.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

4 measures

  • 1of 795

    Academic Growth

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 795 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 174

    All Subjects — Masters

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 1of 174

    Reading — Masters

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 1of 174

    Math — Meets

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

6 measures

  • 2of 179

    Overall score

    Denton County · of the 179 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 174

    School Progress

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 174

    Math — Masters

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 3of 174

    All Subjects — Meets

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 3of 174

    Math — Approaches

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 172

    Closing the Gaps

    Denton County · of the 172 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 4of 172

    Science — Masters

    Denton County · of the 172 that report this measure

  • 6of 174

    Reading — Meets

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 174

    Relative Performance

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure

  • 7of 172

    Science — Meets

    Denton County · of the 172 that report this measure

  • 9of 174

    Reading — Approaches

    Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 2

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

3 measures

  • 21of 813

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 9

  • 24of 813

    Student Achievement

    Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 16

  • 157of 4,518

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar size · of the 4,518 that report this measure · tied with 11

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061902133.