Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Bluebonnet ElemA96vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Bluebonnet Elem
Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 625 students
Current score
96/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.4 ptsvs 91.6 average · 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
18 of 444tied with 23 others
Score vs region
+15.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
17 of 839tied with 8 others
Score vs county
+16.0 ptsvs 80 average · 179 rated schools in Denton County
Denton County placement
2 of 179tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+15.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 4,620 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
79 of 4,620tied with 37 others
Score vs state
+14.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
146 of 7,646tied with 100 others
A96
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.6 average for 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 179 rated schools in Denton County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 4,620 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
85%vs 76.3% avg · +8.7 pts
Masters
63%vs 46.8% avg · +16.2 pts
Among 436 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Bluebonnet Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.6 average for 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 18th of 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 23 others).
Bluebonnet Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 8 others).
Bluebonnet Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 179 rated schools in Denton County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 179 rated schools in Denton County (tied with 1 other).
Bluebonnet Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 4,620 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 79th of 4,620 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 37 others).
Bluebonnet Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement95 A+2.3 vs similar economic context · 436 reporting
School Progress96 A+8.2 vs similar economic context · 434 reporting
Closing the Gaps96 A+6.8 vs similar economic context · 431 reporting
Academic Growth96 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 431 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+7.9 vs similar economic context · 434 reporting
Bluebonnet Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (444 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
95
A
—
School Progress
96
A
—
Closing the Gaps
96
A
—
Academic Growth
96
A
—
Relative Performance
86
B
4
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (96), so
Student Achievement (95) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level95%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Meets grade level85%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Masters grade level63%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Meets grade level86%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Masters grade level65%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
Meets grade level83%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
Masters grade level59%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Meets grade level87%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Masters grade level66%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (444 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
625
Economically disadvantaged
6.6%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
24.8%+14.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.4%−2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.3%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.8%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Bluebonnet Elem
African American 4.5%
Hispanic 9.7%
White 28.7%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 50.8%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 reporting for every category shown · 444 in full cohort
African American 4.8%
Hispanic 17.4%
White 48.5%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 23.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Denton County · 179 reporting for every category shown · 179 in full cohort
African American 13.9%
Hispanic 33.2%
White 36.5%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 10.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,620 reporting for every category shown · 4,620 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.4%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
620
Economically disadvantaged students
41
Emergent bilingual students
154
Special education students
77
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
44
Students in TEA mobility denominator
611
TEA-published mobility rate
7.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 625 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 43 (6.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
625
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−43
Decrease · −6.4%
Change since 2021–22
+69
Increase · +12.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
625
Selected comparison
872.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 439 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Bluebonnet Elem
School year
Students enrolledBluebonnet Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
556
First available year
882.1
2022–23
632
Increase of 76 (13.7%)
902.5
2023–24
672
Increase of 40 (6.3%)
890.9
2024–25
668
Decrease of 4 (0.6%)
883.7
2025–26
625
Decrease of 43 (6.4%)
872.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
15
2.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
19
2.75 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
691
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.2%
Selected comparison
4.7%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 rated schools reporting
−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.75
Selected comparison
7.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated schools reporting
−5.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bluebonnet Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
541
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
624
Suppressed
—
15
2.40
—
7.8
2022–23
674
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
706
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
691
15
2.2%
19
2.75
4.7%
7.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bluebonnet Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
15
2.2%
19
2.75
4.7%
7.7
In-school suspensions
15
2.2%
19
2.75
4.4%
6.2
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Bluebonnet Elem
Parent district: Lewisville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,087
Selected comparison
$10,821
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 435 rated schools reporting
−$3,734 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,087 per student for this campus, $19,986 per student for its parent district, Lewisville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Bluebonnet Elem
Parent district: Lewisville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,111
$13,687
$13,054
$7,204
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 367 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,803
$15,471
$13,108
$7,342
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 378 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,547
$18,091
$14,058
$7,641
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 388 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,331
$17,403
$14,797
$8,261
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 398 rated schools reporting
2022
$18,341
$16,558
$15,708
$9,493
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
2023
$11,063
$17,007
$16,792
$9,527
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,179
$18,110
$18,125
$10,199
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 425 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,087
$19,986
$18,972
$10,821
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 435 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,791+$1,289 vs similar economic context
Teachers
40−16.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.4+0.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Bluebonnet Elem
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 20.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 22.4%
Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 reporting for every category shown · 444 in full cohort
Beginning 4.2%
1 to 5 years 23.8%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 31.8%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Denton County · 179 reporting for every category shown · 179 in full cohort
Beginning 4.6%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 29.4%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,620 reporting for every category shown · 4,620 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bluebonnet Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBluebonnet Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
20
19
Grade 1
21.8
19.3
Grade 2
19.4
19.7
Grade 3
19.8
21.6
Grade 4
21.4
20.4
Grade 5
22
22.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
4 measures
1of 795
Academic Growth
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 795 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 174
All Subjects — Masters
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure
1of 174
Reading — Masters
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure
1of 174
Math — Meets
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
2of 179
Overall score
Denton County · of the 179 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 174
School Progress
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 174
Math — Masters
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure
3of 174
All Subjects — Meets
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure
3of 174
Math — Approaches
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 172
Closing the Gaps
Denton County · of the 172 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
4of 172
Science — Masters
Denton County · of the 172 that report this measure
6of 174
Reading — Meets
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 174
Relative Performance
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure
7of 172
Science — Meets
Denton County · of the 172 that report this measure
9of 174
Reading — Approaches
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
21of 813
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 9
24of 813
Student Achievement
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 813 that report this measure · tied with 16
157of 4,518
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar size · of the 4,518 that report this measure · tied with 11
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061902133.