Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Blanson CTE HS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 1,248 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
98/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+20.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,206 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
9 of 2,206tied with 9 others
A98

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.5 average for 2,206 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 2 points

98 to 100 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 100 is 25.3 points above the 74.7 average among 2,019 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 2,019 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 9 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Top placement

Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

100% Tied for 1st of 373 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 6 share this value

See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
84%vs 42% avg · +42 pts
Masters
31%vs 16.4% avg · +14.6 pts

Among 2,040 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Blanson CTE HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 2,206 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 9th of 2,206 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 9 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBlanson CTE HS 9193979798 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9877.5 2,206 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9777.2 2,192 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9774.7 2,178 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9375.1 2,161 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9181.6 2,141 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement96 A+23.8 vs similar economic context · 2,040 reporting
  • School Progress97 A+18.2 vs similar economic context · 2,033 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps100 A+25.3 vs similar economic context · 2,019 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,989 reporting
  • Relative Performance97 A+19.9 vs similar economic context · 2,033 reporting
  • Blanson CTE HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,206 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement96A—
School Progress97A—
Closing the Gaps100A—
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance97A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (97), so Student Achievement (96) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level97%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 reporting
  • Meets grade level84%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting
  • Meets grade level82%+44 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting
  • Meets grade level89%+52 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting
  • Masters grade level41%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 reporting
  • Meets grade level88%+50 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 reporting
  • Masters grade level58%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,206 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
99.7%+7.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.7%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 329 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
99.7%+8.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 329 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.2%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 330 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+15.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%84.7%+15.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 371 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course100.0%57.0%+43.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA56.3%22.9%+33.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)40.0%11.9%+28.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course85.1%30.3%+54.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification84.4%35.4%+49.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate6.8%2.7%+4.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.9%−6.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit40.3%5.4%+34.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.2%−3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student3.1%8.1%−5.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces2.7%2.7%+0.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
311

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
170

54.7% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
125

40.2% of graduates

Not trackable
16

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
311
Selected comparison
264.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
170
Selected comparison
108.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
54.7%
Selected comparison
40.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

+14.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
40.2%
Selected comparison
53.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

−13.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
5.1%
Selected comparison
6.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

−1.0 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. LONE STAR COLLEGE - N. HARRIS (000722)59
  2. HOUSTON CITY COLLEGE (010633)13
  3. SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY (003606)13

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,248
Economically disadvantaged
80.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.1%−4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.9%−15.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.6%−11.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Blanson CTE HS

African American: 8.5%Hispanic: 86.5%White: 1.8%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 2.4%Two or More Races: 0.6%
  • African American 8.5%
  • Hispanic 86.5%
  • White 1.8%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Two or More Races 0.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,206 reporting for every category shown · 2,206 in full cohort

African American: 14%Hispanic: 68.4%White: 13%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • African American 14%
  • Hispanic 68.4%
  • White 13%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,248
Economically disadvantaged students
1,006
Emergent bilingual students
313
Special education students
36

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
26
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,270
TEA-published mobility rate
2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,248 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 10 (0.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,248

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−10

Decrease · −0.8%

Change since 2021–22
−102

Decrease · −7.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,248
Selected comparison
626.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,176 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Blanson CTE HS
School yearStudents enrolledBlanson CTE HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,350 First available year 652.1
2022–23 1,299 Decrease of 51 (3.8%) 655
2023–24 1,277 Decrease of 22 (1.7%) 649.2
2024–25 1,258 Decrease of 19 (1.5%) 645.6
2025–26 1,248 Decrease of 10 (0.8%) 626.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
105

8.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
166

13.26 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,252

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
8.4%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 rated schools reporting

−4.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
13.26
Selected comparison
32.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,727 rated schools reporting

−18.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Blanson CTE HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,359 Suppressed — 11 0.81 — 16.7
2021–22 1,348 95 7.0% 176 13.06 12.9% 30.8
2022–23 1,286 178 13.8% 305 23.72 13.7% 33.9
2023–24 1,278 120 9.4% 181 14.16 13.7% 33.9
2024–25 1,252 105 8.4% 166 13.26 13.3% 32.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Blanson CTE HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 105 8.4% 166 13.26 13.3% 32.1
In-school suspensions 95 7.6% 118 9.42 11.7% 23.2
Out-of-school suspensions 22 1.8% 25 2.00 8.2% 13
DAEP placements 16 1.3% 19 1.52 5.4% 6.5
Mandatory DAEP placements 16 1.3% 19 1.52 3.9% 4.5
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k2019202120232025
  • Blanson CTE HS
  • Parent district: Aldine ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,390
Selected comparison
$13,044

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,191 rated schools reporting

−$2,654 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,390 per student for this campus, $17,481 per student for its parent district, Aldine ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBlanson CTE HSParent district: Aldine ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2019$7,335$11,964$13,108$8,274 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,097 rated schools reporting
2020$7,139$11,579$14,058$8,784 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,113 rated schools reporting
2021$7,115$13,398$14,797$9,436 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,124 rated schools reporting
2022$7,533$13,566$15,708$10,867 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,142 rated schools reporting
2023$8,989$15,592$16,792$11,377 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,161 rated schools reporting
2024$8,962$17,695$18,125$12,287 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,177 rated schools reporting
2025$10,390$17,481$18,972$13,044 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,191 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,986+$3,828 vs similar economic context
Teachers
77+33.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.2+1.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Blanson CTE HS

Beginning: 3.9%1 to 5 years: 48.2%6 to 10 years: 24.7%11 to 20 years: 10.4%21 to 30 years: 7.6%Over 30 years: 5.2%
  • Beginning 3.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 48.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 10.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 7.6%
  • Over 30 years 5.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,206 reporting for every category shown · 2,206 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.8%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Blanson CTE HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBlanson CTE HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English22.215.3
Secondary languages other than English30.818.3
Secondary math23.716.5
Secondary science24.317.7
Secondary social studies22.617.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

4 measures

  • 1of 7,185

    Closing the Gaps

    Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking

  • 1of 1,887

    Science — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,887 that report this measure · tied with 25

  • 1of 373

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 373 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 1of 136

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 344

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Similar size · of the 344 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 5of 1,482

    School Progress

    Similar size · of the 1,482 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 5of 1,482

    Relative Performance

    Similar size · of the 1,482 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 6of 1,495

    Overall score

    Similar size · of the 1,495 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 7of 344

    Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit

    Similar size · of the 344 that report this measure

  • 7of 136

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 1

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

14 measures

  • 11of 2,028

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,028 that report this measure

  • 11of 810

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 13of 2,028

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,028 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 13of 956

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 956 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 15of 2,040

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,040 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 17of 1,887

    Science — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,887 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 17of 810

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 19of 1,482

    Student Achievement

    Similar size · of the 1,482 that report this measure · tied with 23

  • 20of 2,040

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,040 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 34of 2,038

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,038 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 38of 2,038

    Reading — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,038 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 39of 2,028

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,028 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 47of 1,887

    Science — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,887 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 76of 2,040

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,040 that report this measure · tied with 16

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101902014.