+20.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,206 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
9 of 2,206tied with 9 others
Score vs region
+14.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
15 of 1,303tied with 3 others
Score vs county
+14.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
14 of 911tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+14.5 ptsvs 83.5 average · 1,495 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
6 of 1,495tied with 4 others
Score vs state
+16.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
35 of 7,646tied with 46 others
A98
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.5 average for 2,206 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 83.5 average for 1,495 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 2 points
98 to 1002024-25 to 2025-26
100 is 25.3 points above
the 74.7 average among 2,019 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st of 2,019 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 9 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Blanson CTE HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 2,206 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 2,206 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 9 others).
Blanson CTE HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 15th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 3 others).
Blanson CTE HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 14th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 3 others).
Blanson CTE HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.5 average for 1,495 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 1,495 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 4 others).
Blanson CTE HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+23.8 vs similar economic context · 2,040 reporting
School Progress97 A+18.2 vs similar economic context · 2,033 reporting
Closing the Gaps100 A+25.3 vs similar economic context · 2,019 reporting
Academic Growth83 B+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,989 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+19.9 vs similar economic context · 2,033 reporting
Blanson CTE HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,206 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
100
A
—
Academic Growth
83
B
7
Relative Performance
97
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (97), so
Student Achievement (96) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level97%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 reporting
Meets grade level84%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 reporting
Masters grade level31%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting
Meets grade level80%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting
Masters grade level13%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting
Meets grade level82%+44 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting
Masters grade level35%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting
Meets grade level89%+52 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting
Masters grade level41%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 reporting
Meets grade level88%+50 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 reporting
Masters grade level58%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 810 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,206 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
99.7%+7.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.7%+7.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 329 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
99.7%+8.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 329 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.2%−1.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 330 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+15.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
84.7%
+15.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 371 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
100.0%
57.0%
+43.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
56.3%
22.9%
+33.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
40.0%
11.9%
+28.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
85.1%
30.3%
+54.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
84.4%
35.4%
+49.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
6.8%
2.7%
+4.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
6.9%
−6.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
40.3%
5.4%
+34.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.2%
−3.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
3.1%
8.1%
−5.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
2.7%
2.7%
+0.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
311
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
170
54.7% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
125
40.2% of graduates
Not trackable
16
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
311
Selected comparison
264.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
170
Selected comparison
108.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
54.7%
Selected comparison
40.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting
+14.1 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
40.2%
Selected comparison
53.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting
−13.1 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
5.1%
Selected comparison
6.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting
−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
LONE STAR COLLEGE - N. HARRIS (000722)59
HOUSTON CITY COLLEGE (010633)13
SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY (003606)13
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,248
Economically disadvantaged
80.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.1%−4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.9%−15.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.6%−11.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Blanson CTE HS
African American 8.5%
Hispanic 86.5%
White 1.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.4%
Two or More Races 0.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,206 reporting for every category shown · 2,206 in full cohort
African American 14%
Hispanic 68.4%
White 13%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,495 reporting for every category shown · 1,495 in full cohort
African American 12.8%
Hispanic 50.7%
White 24.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,248
Economically disadvantaged students
1,006
Emergent bilingual students
313
Special education students
36
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
26
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,270
TEA-published mobility rate
2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,248 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 10 (0.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,248
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−10
Decrease · −0.8%
Change since 2021–22
−102
Decrease · −7.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,248
Selected comparison
626.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,176 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Blanson CTE HS
School year
Students enrolledBlanson CTE HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,350
First available year
652.1
2022–23
1,299
Decrease of 51 (3.8%)
655
2023–24
1,277
Decrease of 22 (1.7%)
649.2
2024–25
1,258
Decrease of 19 (1.5%)
645.6
2025–26
1,248
Decrease of 10 (0.8%)
626.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
105
8.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
166
13.26 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,252
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
8.4%
Selected comparison
13.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 rated schools reporting
−4.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
13.26
Selected comparison
32.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,727 rated schools reporting
−18.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Blanson CTE HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,359
Suppressed
—
11
0.81
—
16.7
2021–22
1,348
95
7.0%
176
13.06
12.9%
30.8
2022–23
1,286
178
13.8%
305
23.72
13.7%
33.9
2023–24
1,278
120
9.4%
181
14.16
13.7%
33.9
2024–25
1,252
105
8.4%
166
13.26
13.3%
32.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Blanson CTE HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
105
8.4%
166
13.26
13.3%
32.1
In-school suspensions
95
7.6%
118
9.42
11.7%
23.2
Out-of-school suspensions
22
1.8%
25
2.00
8.2%
13
DAEP placements
16
1.3%
19
1.52
5.4%
6.5
Mandatory DAEP placements
16
1.3%
19
1.52
3.9%
4.5
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Blanson CTE HS
Parent district: Aldine ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,390
Selected comparison
$13,044
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,191 rated schools reporting
−$2,654 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,390 per student for this campus, $17,481 per student for its parent district, Aldine ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Blanson CTE HS
Parent district: Aldine ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2019
$7,335
$11,964
$13,108
$8,274
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,097 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,139
$11,579
$14,058
$8,784
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,113 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,115
$13,398
$14,797
$9,436
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,124 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,533
$13,566
$15,708
$10,867
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,142 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,989
$15,592
$16,792
$11,377
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,161 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,962
$17,695
$18,125
$12,287
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,177 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,390
$17,481
$18,972
$13,044
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,191 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,986+$3,828 vs similar economic context
Teachers
77+33.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.2+1.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Blanson CTE HS
Beginning 3.9%
1 to 5 years 48.2%
6 to 10 years 24.7%
11 to 20 years 10.4%
21 to 30 years 7.6%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,206 reporting for every category shown · 2,206 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,495 reporting for every category shown · 1,495 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 26.9%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Blanson CTE HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBlanson CTE HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
22.2
15.3
Secondary languages other than English
30.8
18.3
Secondary math
23.7
16.5
Secondary science
24.3
17.7
Secondary social studies
22.6
17.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
4 measures
1of 7,185
Closing the Gaps
Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking
1of 1,887
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,887 that report this measure · tied with 25
1of 373
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 373 that report this measure · tied with 5
1of 136
Earned an industry-based certification
Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 344
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar size · of the 344 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
5of 1,482
School Progress
Similar size · of the 1,482 that report this measure · tied with 7
5of 1,482
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 1,482 that report this measure · tied with 5
6of 1,495
Overall score
Similar size · of the 1,495 that report this measure · tied with 4
7of 344
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Similar size · of the 344 that report this measure
7of 136
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
14 measures
11of 2,028
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,028 that report this measure
11of 810
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 1
13of 2,028
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,028 that report this measure · tied with 10
13of 956
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar size · of the 956 that report this measure · tied with 7
15of 2,040
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,040 that report this measure · tied with 8
17of 1,887
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,887 that report this measure · tied with 1
17of 810
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 2
19of 1,482
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 1,482 that report this measure · tied with 23
20of 2,040
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,040 that report this measure · tied with 1
34of 2,038
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,038 that report this measure · tied with 2
38of 2,038
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,038 that report this measure · tied with 2
39of 2,028
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,028 that report this measure · tied with 6
47of 1,887
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,887 that report this measure · tied with 5
76of 2,040
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,040 that report this measure · tied with 16
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101902014.