Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Blackburn ElemB81vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Blackburn Elem
Kaufman County · Region 10: Richardson · 668 students
Current score
81/1002025-26
Change
+6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−0.2 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,818 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
928 of 1,818tied with 77 others
Score vs region
−1.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
678 of 1,157tied with 30 others
Score vs county
+3.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 62 rated schools in Kaufman County
Kaufman County placement
27 of 62among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+0.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,454 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,273 of 4,454tied with 145 others
Score vs state
−0.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,141 of 7,646tied with 260 others
B81
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 73 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 81.2 average for 1,818 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County.The current score is level with the 80.6 average for 4,454 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 51.3% avg · +3.7 pts
Masters
34%vs 21.7% avg · +12.3 pts
Among 1,749 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Blackburn Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.2 average for 1,818 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 928th of 1,818 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).
Blackburn Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 678th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 30 others).
Blackburn Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 27th of 62 rated schools in Kaufman County.
Blackburn Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.6 average for 4,454 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,273rd of 4,454 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 145 others).
Blackburn Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 73 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement82 B+1.5 vs similar economic context · 1,749 reporting
School Progress83 B+1.7 vs similar economic context · 1,742 reporting
Closing the Gaps75 C−3.4 vs similar economic context · 1,726 reporting
Academic Growth69 D−5.9 vs similar economic context · 1,698 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+3.7 vs similar economic context · 1,742 reporting
Blackburn Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,818 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
82
B
8
School Progress
83
B
7
Closing the Gaps
75
C
5
Academic Growth
69
D
1
Relative Performance
83
B
7
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so
Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level73%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 reporting
Meets grade level55%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 reporting
Masters grade level34%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 reporting
Meets grade level60%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 reporting
Masters grade level38%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level67%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,737 reporting
Meets grade level50%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,737 reporting
Masters grade level31%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,737 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,818 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
668
Economically disadvantaged
54.7%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.4%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.6%−7.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.4%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.3%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Blackburn Elem
African American 57.5%
Hispanic 17.1%
White 16.7%
Asian 2.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting for every category shown · 1,818 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 44.1%
White 38.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
African American 24.7%
Hispanic 39.8%
White 29.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,454 reporting for every category shown · 4,454 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 54%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
666
Economically disadvantaged students
364
Emergent bilingual students
56
Special education students
77
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
88
Students in TEA mobility denominator
601
TEA-published mobility rate
14.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 668 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (0.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
668
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+6
Increase · +0.9%
Change since 2021–22
+65
Increase · +10.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
668
Selected comparison
633.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,779 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Blackburn Elem
School year
Students enrolledBlackburn Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
603
First available year
635.9
2022–23
697
Increase of 94 (15.6%)
641.9
2023–24
580
Decrease of 117 (16.8%)
641.4
2024–25
662
Increase of 82 (14.1%)
638.5
2025–26
668
Increase of 6 (0.9%)
633.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
33
4.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
63
9.18 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
686
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.8%
Selected comparison
12.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 rated schools reporting
−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
9.18
Selected comparison
27.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 rated schools reporting
−18.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Blackburn Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
930
61
6.6%
139
14.95
9.8%
19
2021–22
700
58
8.3%
128
18.29
12.4%
28
2022–23
775
49
6.3%
88
11.35
12.9%
29.6
2023–24
618
25
4.0%
57
9.22
12.8%
29.7
2024–25
686
33
4.8%
63
9.18
12.4%
27.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Blackburn Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
33
4.8%
63
9.18
12.4%
27.9
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
29
4.2%
58
8.45
6.3%
9
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Blackburn Elem
Parent district: Forney ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,028
Selected comparison
$12,285
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 rated schools reporting
−$4,257 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,028 per student for this campus, $19,790 per student for its parent district, Forney ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Blackburn Elem
Parent district: Forney ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,152
$9,960
$13,054
$7,905
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,649 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,026
$12,041
$13,108
$8,077
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,666 rated schools reporting
2020
$5,561
$13,290
$14,058
$8,646
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,682 rated schools reporting
2021
$5,648
$20,660
$14,797
$9,024
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,698 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,617
$21,445
$15,708
$10,386
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,713 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,516
$28,149
$16,792
$10,896
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,738 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,594
$32,204
$18,125
$11,764
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,764 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,028
$19,790
$18,972
$12,285
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,297+$745 vs similar economic context
Teachers
49+6.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.7−5.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Blackburn Elem
Beginning 12.4%
1 to 5 years 22.1%
6 to 10 years 27.6%
11 to 20 years 25.6%
21 to 30 years 12.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting for every category shown · 1,818 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
Beginning 8.2%
1 to 5 years 34%
6 to 10 years 18.6%
11 to 20 years 21.9%
21 to 30 years 14.8%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,454 reporting for every category shown · 4,454 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Blackburn Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBlackburn Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.4
18
Grade 1
20.6
18.3
Grade 2
20.1
18.5
Grade 3
19.4
18.8
Grade 4
17.1
19
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
4of 59
Reading — Masters
Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 59
All Subjects — Masters
Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure
5of 57
Math — Masters
Kaufman County · of the 57 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 59
Reading — Meets
Kaufman County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 129902105.