Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Bean Elem

Lubbock County · Region 17: Lubbock · 403 students

Current score
58/1002025-26
Change
−22 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
−19.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2,145 of 2,273tied with 33 others
F58

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 77.6 average for 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

20.7% −2.2 pts vs 22.9%

  • 20.7% is 2.2 percentage points lower than the 22.9% average among 2,146 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Bean Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 58 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 22 points since 2022-23.

Ranks 2,145th of 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 33 others).

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 4 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

4 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBean Elem 80667858 2022-232023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26F5877.6 2,273 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7877.2 2,254 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6673.9 2,236 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8073.5 2,226 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement54 F−16.5 vs similar economic context · 2,106 reporting
  • School Progress56 F−22.8 vs similar economic context · 2,101 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps64 D−11.0 vs similar economic context · 2,085 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73 · 2,066 reporting
  • Relative Performance56 F−20.8 vs similar economic context · 2,100 reporting
  • Bean Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,273 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement54F6
School Progress56F4
Closing the Gaps64D6
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance56F4

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (56), so Student Achievement (54) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 56.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level50%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,106 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level52%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 reporting
  • Meets grade level28%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level48%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,097 reporting
  • Meets grade level23%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,097 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,097 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,273 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
403
Economically disadvantaged
91.0%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
36.7%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.5%−3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.4%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
20.7%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Bean Elem

African American: 10%Hispanic: 86.3%White: 2.2%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 0.2%Pacific Islander: 0.5%Two or More Races: 0.2%
  • African American 10%
  • Hispanic 86.3%
  • White 2.2%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 0.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 0.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,273 reporting for every category shown · 2,273 in full cohort

African American: 14.8%Hispanic: 75.9%White: 6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.6%
  • African American 14.8%
  • Hispanic 75.9%
  • White 6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
401
Economically disadvantaged students
365
Emergent bilingual students
147
Special education students
58

TEA context labels

  • First year with grade 3 or higher and not a new campus

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
23
Students in TEA mobility denominator
136
TEA-published mobility rate
16.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 403 students in 2025–26, an increase of 168 (71.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
403

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+168

Increase · +71.5%

Change since 2022–23
+299

Increase · +287.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
403
Selected comparison
574.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,250 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Bean Elem
School yearStudents enrolledBean ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23 104 First available year 615.9
2023–24 175 Increase of 71 (68.3%) 606.4
2024–25 235 Increase of 60 (34.3%) 599.7
2025–26 403 Increase of 168 (71.5%) 574.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
249

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Bean Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23 118 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 191 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 249 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Bean Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$9k$14k$20k20232025
  • Bean Elem
  • Parent district: Lubbock ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,685
Selected comparison
$13,204

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,252 rated schools reporting

−$3,519 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,685 per student for this campus, $14,938 per student for its parent district, Lubbock ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBean ElemParent district: Lubbock ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2023$11,562$16,314$16,792$11,723 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,225 rated schools reporting
2024$11,600$15,605$18,125$12,597 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,239 rated schools reporting
2025$9,685$14,938$18,972$13,204 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,252 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$55,817−$12,356 vs similar economic context
Teachers
28−12.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2−0.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Bean Elem

Beginning: 19.4%1 to 5 years: 33.9%6 to 10 years: 11.7%11 to 20 years: 29%21 to 30 years: 2.5%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 19.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 33.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 11.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 29%
  • 21 to 30 years 2.5%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,273 reporting for every category shown · 2,273 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.5%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 18.8%11 to 20 years: 27%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 27%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Bean Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBean Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2018.1
Grade 12618.3
Grade 217.318.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 152901206.