Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 497 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
98/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+20.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,233 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
9 of 2,233tied with 9 others
A98

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,233 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 6 points

92 to 98 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 98 is 20.4 points above the 77.6 average among 2,233 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 7 points

90 to 97 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 97 is 18.2 points above the 78.8 average among 2,055 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

100 +25.3 pts vs 74.7

  • 100 is 25.3 points above the 74.7 average among 2,041 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 2,041 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 9 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,233 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 9th of 2,233 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 9 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBarack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith 9183979298 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9877.6 2,233 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9277.1 2,219 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9774.5 2,202 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8374.9 2,187 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9181.7 2,167 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement97 A+25.1 vs similar economic context · 2,062 reporting
  • School Progress97 A+18.2 vs similar economic context · 2,055 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps100 A+25.3 vs similar economic context · 2,041 reporting
  • Academic Growth85 B+12.7 vs similar economic context · 2,008 reporting
  • Relative Performance97 A+19.9 vs similar economic context · 2,055 reporting
  • Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,233 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement97A—
School Progress97A—
Closing the Gaps100A—
Academic Growth85B5
Relative Performance97A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level96%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,062 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,062 reporting
  • Masters grade level41%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,062 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,060 reporting
  • Meets grade level94%+48 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,060 reporting
  • Masters grade level54%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,060 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,050 reporting
  • Meets grade level84%+46 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,050 reporting
  • Masters grade level37%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,050 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 807 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 807 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 807 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,233 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+7.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 324 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+7.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.4%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 327 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+15.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%84.3%+15.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 370 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course97.2%56.5%+40.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA63.9%22.1%+41.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)77.8%11.6%+66.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course22.2%29.5%−7.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification1.4%35.0%−33.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.8%−2.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.6%−6.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.6%−5.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.2%−3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student6.9%8.1%−1.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces2.8%2.7%+0.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
39

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
21

53.8% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
14

35.9% of graduates

Not trackable
4

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
39
Selected comparison
260.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
21
Selected comparison
104

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
53.8%
Selected comparison
39.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

+14.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
35.9%
Selected comparison
54.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

−18.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
10.3%
Selected comparison
6.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

+4.0 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
497
Economically disadvantaged
81.7%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
36.6%+5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
3.0%−15.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.3%−14.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith

African American: 11.3%Hispanic: 83.9%White: 2.2%American Indian: 0.8%Asian: 1.4%Two or More Races: 0.4%
  • African American 11.3%
  • Hispanic 83.9%
  • White 2.2%
  • American Indian 0.8%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Two or More Races 0.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,233 reporting for every category shown · 2,233 in full cohort

African American: 14.2%Hispanic: 69.5%White: 11.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.4%
  • African American 14.2%
  • Hispanic 69.5%
  • White 11.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
497
Economically disadvantaged students
406
Emergent bilingual students
182
Special education students
15

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
18
Students in TEA mobility denominator
563
TEA-published mobility rate
3.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 497 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 57 (10.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
497

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−57

Decrease · −10.3%

Change since 2021–22
+37

Increase · +8.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
497
Selected comparison
621.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,204 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith
School yearStudents enrolledBarack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo SmithChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 460 First available year 649.9
2022–23 499 Increase of 39 (8.5%) 651.4
2023–24 541 Increase of 42 (8.4%) 644.6
2024–25 554 Increase of 13 (2.4%) 640.9
2025–26 497 Decrease of 57 (10.3%) 621.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
550

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 495 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 458 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 499 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 541 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 550 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$16k$24k20182020202220242025
  • Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith
  • Parent district: Dallas ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,051
Selected comparison
$13,136

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,217 rated schools reporting

−$2,085 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,051 per student for this campus, $23,271 per student for its parent district, Dallas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBarack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo SmithParent district: Dallas ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$20,744$13,363$13,054$8,207 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,100 rated schools reporting
2019$7,802$13,990$13,108$8,305 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,127 rated schools reporting
2020$8,589$14,981$14,058$8,808 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,141 rated schools reporting
2021$8,208$17,075$14,797$9,479 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,150 rated schools reporting
2022$9,312$18,716$15,708$10,922 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,167 rated schools reporting
2023$9,800$20,932$16,792$11,457 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,186 rated schools reporting
2024$9,402$22,990$18,125$12,427 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,201 rated schools reporting
2025$11,051$23,271$18,972$13,136 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,217 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$76,568+$9,222 vs similar economic context
Teachers
33−9.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.1+0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith

1 to 5 years: 21.2%6 to 10 years: 36.4%11 to 20 years: 18.2%21 to 30 years: 9.1%Over 30 years: 15.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 36.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 18.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.1%
  • Over 30 years 15.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,233 reporting for every category shown · 2,233 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.6%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Barack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBarack Obama Male Leadership Acad at A Maceo Smith · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 616.717.7
Secondary English19.915.3
Secondary languages other than English8.718.2
Secondary math19.416.5
Secondary science18.417.7
Secondary social studies17.517.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 7,185

    Closing the Gaps

    Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 4of 373

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 373 that report this measure

  • 6of 1,157

    Overall score

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,157 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 8of 2,060

    Reading — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,060 that report this measure

  • 10of 2,050

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,050 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 183

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 183 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

14 measures

  • 11of 2,060

    Reading — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,060 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 12of 1,106

    Relative Performance

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 13of 2,060

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,060 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 13of 1,106

    School Progress

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 14of 2,050

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,050 that report this measure · tied with 11

  • 15of 2,062

    Student Achievement

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,062 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 24of 2,062

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,062 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 24of 2,062

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,062 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 27of 2,062

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,062 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 27of 2,050

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,050 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 29of 540

    Science — Approaches

    Dallas County · of the 540 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 50of 1,906

    Science — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,906 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 57of 2,135

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,135 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 102of 2,139

    Attendance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,139 that report this measure · tied with 19

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057905381.