+19.3 ptsvs 77.7 average · 2,148 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
16 of 2,148tied with 12 others
Score vs region
+13.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
19 of 1,303tied with 18 others
Score vs county
+13.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
18 of 911tied with 13 others
Score vs similar-size group
+16.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,123 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
54 of 4,123tied with 37 others
Score vs state
+15.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
82 of 7,646tied with 63 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 85 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.7 average for 2,148 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,123 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
80%vs 42.5% avg · +37.5 pts
Masters
23%vs 16.6% avg · +6.4 pts
Among 1,986 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Avalos P-Tech School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.7 average for 2,148 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 16th of 2,148 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 12 others).
Avalos P-Tech School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 18 others).
Avalos P-Tech School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 18th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 13 others).
Avalos P-Tech School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,123 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 54th of 4,123 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 37 others).
Avalos P-Tech School is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 85 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+20.3 vs similar economic context · 1,986 reporting
School Progress97 A+18.0 vs similar economic context · 1,980 reporting
Closing the Gaps97 A+22.1 vs similar economic context · 1,966 reporting
Academic Growth87 B+14.8 vs similar economic context · 1,930 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+19.6 vs similar economic context · 1,980 reporting
Avalos P-Tech School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,148 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
97
A
—
Academic Growth
87
B
3
Relative Performance
97
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (97), so
Student Achievement (93) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level96%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 reporting
Meets grade level80%+38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 reporting
Masters grade level23%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 reporting
Meets grade level80%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 reporting
Masters grade level10%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 reporting
Meets grade level67%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 reporting
Masters grade level16%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,832 reporting
Meets grade level84%+46 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,832 reporting
Masters grade level37%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,832 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
Meets grade level90%+51 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
Masters grade level43%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 814 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,148 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
96.0%+3.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−92.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−91.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.2%−1.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+15.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
85.0%
+15.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
86.5%
57.6%
+28.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
64.6%
23.0%
+41.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
32.3%
11.6%
+20.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
94.8%
29.9%
+64.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
26.0%
35.9%
−9.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
11.5%
2.6%
+8.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
41.7%
6.7%
+35.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
17.7%
5.4%
+12.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.3%
−3.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
1.0%
8.2%
−7.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
3.1%
2.8%
+0.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
108
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
52
48.1% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
55
50.9% of graduates
Not trackable
1
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
108
Selected comparison
264.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 332 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
52
Selected comparison
108.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 332 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
48.1%
Selected comparison
40.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 332 rated schools reporting
+7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
50.9%
Selected comparison
53.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 332 rated schools reporting
−2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
0.9%
Selected comparison
6.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 332 rated schools reporting
−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY (003606)9
LONE STAR COLLEGE - KINGWOOD (000719)8
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY (003615)6
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
413
Economically disadvantaged
79.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.2%−10.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
3.6%−15.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.2%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.4%−6.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Avalos P-Tech School
African American 6.8%
Hispanic 90.8%
White 1.5%
Asian 0.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,148 reporting for every category shown · 2,148 in full cohort
African American 14%
Hispanic 66.9%
White 14.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,123 reporting for every category shown · 4,123 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 54.9%
White 26.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
413
Economically disadvantaged students
328
Emergent bilingual students
75
Special education students
15
Early college pathways
Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
413
TEA-published share: 100%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
9
Students in TEA mobility denominator
403
TEA-published mobility rate
2.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 413 students in 2025–26, an increase of 13 (3.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
413
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+13
Increase · +3.3%
Change since 2021–22
+48
Increase · +13.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
413
Selected comparison
633.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,118 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Avalos P-Tech School
School year
Students enrolledAvalos P-Tech School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
365
First available year
657
2022–23
452
Increase of 87 (23.8%)
660.5
2023–24
421
Decrease of 31 (6.9%)
655.7
2024–25
400
Decrease of 21 (5.0%)
652.3
2025–26
413
Increase of 13 (3.3%)
633.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
25
6.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
44
11.11 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
396
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.3%
Selected comparison
13.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,594 rated schools reporting
−7.1 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
11.11
Selected comparison
32.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,698 rated schools reporting
−21.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Avalos P-Tech School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
255
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
362
22
6.1%
43
11.88
13.0%
31.3
2022–23
437
37
8.5%
59
13.50
13.8%
34.4
2023–24
424
51
12.0%
84
19.81
13.8%
34.4
2024–25
396
25
6.3%
44
11.11
13.4%
32.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Avalos P-Tech School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
25
6.3%
44
11.11
13.4%
32.8
In-school suspensions
10
2.5%
11
2.78
11.8%
23.8
Out-of-school suspensions
19
4.8%
29
7.32
8.2%
12.9
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Avalos P-Tech School
Parent district: Aldine ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$14,101
Selected comparison
$13,049
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,135 rated schools reporting
+$1,052 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $14,101 per student for this campus, $17,481 per student for its parent district, Aldine ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Avalos P-Tech School
Parent district: Aldine ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2020
$13,824
$11,579
$14,058
$8,760
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,716
$13,398
$14,797
$9,394
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,067 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,667
$13,566
$15,708
$10,811
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,085 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,466
$15,592
$16,792
$11,260
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,104 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,883
$17,695
$18,125
$12,269
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,121 rated schools reporting
2025
$14,101
$17,481
$18,972
$13,049
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,135 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$68,892+$1,915 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−14.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2+0.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Avalos P-Tech School
Beginning 10.3%
1 to 5 years 34.5%
6 to 10 years 31%
11 to 20 years 13.8%
21 to 30 years 10.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,148 reporting for every category shown · 2,148 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,123 reporting for every category shown · 4,123 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Avalos P-Tech School in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classAvalos P-Tech School · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
15.1
15.3
Secondary languages other than English
20.3
18.2
Secondary math
15.4
16.5
Secondary science
17.6
17.8
Secondary social studies
20.5
17.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
5of 198
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Region 04: Houston · of the 198 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
20 measures
12of 1,980
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,980 that report this measure · tied with 10
12of 1,241
School Progress
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,241 that report this measure · tied with 18
14of 814
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 814 that report this measure
16of 2,148
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,148 that report this measure · tied with 12
18of 379
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 379 that report this measure
19of 379
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 379 that report this measure
20of 802
Science — Approaches
Harris County · of the 802 that report this measure · tied with 13
20of 379
Earned an associate degree
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 379 that report this measure
22of 1,986
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,986 that report this measure · tied with 5
25of 1,986
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,986 that report this measure · tied with 2
25of 1,966
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,966 that report this measure · tied with 9
30of 1,984
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,984 that report this measure · tied with 1
31of 1,832
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,832 that report this measure · tied with 2
33of 814
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 814 that report this measure · tied with 1
37of 1,984
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,984 that report this measure · tied with 1
38of 1,975
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,975 that report this measure · tied with 5
49of 1,975
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,975 that report this measure · tied with 7
56of 1,986
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,986 that report this measure · tied with 10
72of 1,832
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,832 that report this measure · tied with 10
107of 1,930
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,930 that report this measure · tied with 30
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101902015.