Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Autumn Creek Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 800 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−11 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−11.0 ptsvs 80 average · 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,693 of 2,003tied with 71 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80 average for 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

12.5% −4.2 pts vs 16.7%

  • 12.5% is 4.2 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 1,939 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

95.2% +1.1 pts vs 94.1%

  • 95.2% is 1.1 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 1,939 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Autumn Creek Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80 average for 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,693rd of 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 71 others).

2 consecutive years rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAutumn Creek Elem 8063686969 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6980.0 2,003 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6979.7 1,980 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6877.7 1,961 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6378.3 1,928 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8082.2 1,904 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement69 D−8.9 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
  • School Progress66 D−14.8 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps72 C−5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,871 reporting
  • Academic Growth66 D−7.9 vs similar economic context · 1,831 reporting
  • Relative Performance66 D−13.2 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
  • Autumn Creek Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,003 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement69D1
School Progress66D4
Closing the Gaps72C8
Academic Growth66D4
Relative Performance66D4

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (69), so School Progress (66) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 69.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level67%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,003 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
800
Economically disadvantaged
64.5%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.8%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.3%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.5%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Autumn Creek Elem

African American: 52.3%Hispanic: 35.5%White: 4.9%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 1.1%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 52.3%
  • Hispanic 35.5%
  • White 4.9%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 1.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting for every category shown · 2,003 in full cohort

African American: 11.2%Hispanic: 51.5%White: 30.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.2%
  • Hispanic 51.5%
  • White 30.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
800
Economically disadvantaged students
516
Emergent bilingual students
70
Special education students
162

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
103
Students in TEA mobility denominator
767
TEA-published mobility rate
13.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 800 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 130 (14.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
800

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−130

Decrease · −14.0%

Change since 2021–22
+212

Increase · +36.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
800
Selected comparison
624.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Autumn Creek Elem
School yearStudents enrolledAutumn Creek ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 588 First available year 640.4
2022–23 817 Increase of 229 (38.9%) 647
2023–24 869 Increase of 52 (6.4%) 643
2024–25 930 Increase of 61 (7.0%) 638.4
2025–26 800 Decrease of 130 (14.0%) 624.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
42

4.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
62

6.34 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
978

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.3%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 rated schools reporting

−8.6 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
6.34
Selected comparison
30.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting

−24.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Autumn Creek Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2021–22 662 33 5.0% 57 8.61 12.9% 30.1
2022–23 887 34 3.8% 54 6.09 13.4% 32.2
2023–24 929 39 4.2% 71 7.64 13.2% 31.8
2024–25 978 42 4.3% 62 6.34 12.9% 30.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Autumn Creek Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 42 4.3% 62 6.34 12.9% 30.4
In-school suspensions 42 4.3% 58 5.93 11.6% 23.2
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$15k$22k202220242025
  • Autumn Creek Elem
  • Parent district: Humble ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,452
Selected comparison
$12,669

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting

−$2,217 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,452 per student for this campus, $17,687 per student for its parent district, Humble ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAutumn Creek ElemParent district: Humble ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2022$20,937$15,855$15,708$10,418 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2023$9,579$15,556$16,792$11,137 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 rated schools reporting
2024$9,308$16,627$18,125$12,051 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting
2025$10,452$17,687$18,972$12,669 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,233+$3,837 vs similar economic context
Teachers
66+23.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.1−1.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Autumn Creek Elem

Beginning: 4.4%1 to 5 years: 25.6%6 to 10 years: 31.6%11 to 20 years: 25%21 to 30 years: 12.1%Over 30 years: 1.5%
  • Beginning 4.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 31.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 25%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.1%
  • Over 30 years 1.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting for every category shown · 2,003 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 26.2%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Autumn Creek Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAutumn Creek Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.918
Grade 119.318.3
Grade 21918.4
Grade 32018.6
Grade 419.519
Grade 523.619.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101913130.