+3.5 ptsvs 83.5 average · 53 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
24 of 53among reporting charter campuses
Score vs similar-size group
+6.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 441 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
133 of 441tied with 17 others
Score vs state
+5.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
297 of 829tied with 37 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.5 average for 53 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 441 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
91%vs 54.8% avg · +36.2 pts
Masters
52%vs 25% avg · +27 pts
Among 53 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
2nd of 53 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
1st of 53 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Arlington Classics Academy - MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.5 average for 53 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 24th of 53 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.
Arlington Classics Academy - MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 441 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 133rd of 441 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 17 others).
Arlington Classics Academy - MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+7.4 vs similar economic context · 53 reporting
School Progress83 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 51 reporting
Closing the Gaps77 C−3.4 vs similar economic context · 51 reporting
Academic Growth82 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 51 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+8.2 vs similar economic context · 51 reporting
Arlington Classics Academy - MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (53 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
83
B
7
Closing the Gaps
77
C
3
Academic Growth
82
B
8
Relative Performance
83
B
7
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so
School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level89%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Meets grade level65%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Masters grade level35%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Meets grade level74%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Masters grade level41%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Meets grade level47%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Masters grade level22%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Meets grade level91%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Masters grade level52%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 reporting
Meets grade level67%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 reporting
Masters grade level41%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (53 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
531
Economically disadvantaged
29.6%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.1%−6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.3%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.6%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.1%−7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Arlington Classics Academy - MS
African American 22%
Hispanic 23.2%
White 30.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 15.4%
Two or More Races 8.3%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 37.4%
White 37.9%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 9.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 441 reporting for every category shown · 441 in full cohort
African American 16.3%
Hispanic 66%
White 9.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
531
Economically disadvantaged students
157
Emergent bilingual students
27
Special education students
39
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
34
Students in TEA mobility denominator
527
TEA-published mobility rate
6.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 531 students in 2025–26, an increase of 22 (4.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
531
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+22
Increase · +4.3%
Change since 2021–22
+37
Increase · +7.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
531
Selected comparison
536
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Arlington Classics Academy - MS
School year
Students enrolledArlington Classics Academy - MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
494
First available year
391.6
2022–23
482
Decrease of 12 (2.4%)
444.6
2023–24
494
Increase of 12 (2.5%)
498.2
2024–25
509
Increase of 15 (3.0%)
513.4
2025–26
531
Increase of 22 (4.3%)
536
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
72
13.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
114
21.63 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
527
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
13.7%
Selected comparison
6.8%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting
+6.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
21.63
Selected comparison
10
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
+11.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Arlington Classics Academy - MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
512
Suppressed
—
11
2.15
—
4.9
2021–22
499
57
11.4%
80
16.03
8.4%
12.3
2022–23
493
64
13.0%
103
20.89
7.8%
12.4
2023–24
502
63
12.6%
115
22.91
6.9%
11
2024–25
527
72
13.7%
114
21.63
6.8%
10
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Arlington Classics Academy - MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
72
13.7%
114
21.63
6.8%
10
In-school suspensions
62
11.8%
83
15.75
4.7%
5.9
Out-of-school suspensions
29
5.5%
31
5.88
4.8%
6.6
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Arlington Classics Academy - MS
Parent district: Arlington Classics Academy
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,490
Selected comparison
$10,593
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 rated charter campuses reporting
−$1,103 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,490 per student for this campus, $11,912 per student for its parent district, Arlington Classics Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Arlington Classics Academy - MS
Parent district: Arlington Classics Academy
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,883
$8,012
$13,054
$6,795
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 30 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$5,912
$8,022
$13,108
$7,654
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$5,598
$8,627
$14,058
$7,721
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$6,417
$9,539
$14,797
$8,027
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$6,971
$10,184
$15,708
$9,565
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$7,869
$10,749
$16,792
$9,901
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 48 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$8,885
$11,779
$18,125
$10,199
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$9,490
$11,912
$18,972
$10,593
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,175+$14,629 vs similar economic context
Teachers
32−2.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.6−1.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Arlington Classics Academy - MS
1 to 5 years 25%
6 to 10 years 12.5%
11 to 20 years 25%
21 to 30 years 37.5%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort
Beginning 11.7%
1 to 5 years 42.5%
6 to 10 years 22.9%
11 to 20 years 14.4%
21 to 30 years 5.9%
Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 441 reporting for every category shown · 441 in full cohort
Beginning 13.4%
1 to 5 years 47.1%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 13.3%
21 to 30 years 3.8%
Over 30 years 0.6%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Arlington Classics Academy - MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classArlington Classics Academy - MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
22.8
21.7
Secondary English
23.4
14.8
Secondary languages other than English
20.7
16.2
Secondary math
23.5
14.9
Secondary science
24.2
17.2
Secondary social studies
22.5
16.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 53
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 53 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
2of 425
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 425 that report this measure · tied with 7
2of 53
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 53 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
4of 40
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 40 that report this measure
6of 53
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 53 that report this measure
6of 50
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 50 that report this measure
8of 53
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 53 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 50
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 50 that report this measure
10of 40
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 40 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
20of 441
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 441 that report this measure · tied with 5
22of 441
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 441 that report this measure · tied with 6
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220802040.