+9.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,682 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
145 of 1,682tied with 66 others
Score vs region
+8.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
185 of 1,303tied with 67 others
Score vs county
+8.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
130 of 911tied with 41 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,431 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
387 of 4,431tied with 171 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,682 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,431 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
69%vs 53.6% avg · +15.4 pts
Masters
43%vs 23.4% avg · +19.6 pts
Among 1,624 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Arabic Immersion Magnet School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,682 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 145th of 1,682 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).
Arabic Immersion Magnet School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 185th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 67 others).
Arabic Immersion Magnet School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 130th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 41 others).
Arabic Immersion Magnet School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,431 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 387th of 4,431 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 171 others).
Arabic Immersion Magnet School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+10.1 vs similar economic context · 1,624 reporting
School Progress91 A+9.4 vs similar economic context · 1,619 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,605 reporting
Academic Growth90 A+14.1 vs similar economic context · 1,590 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,619 reporting
Arabic Immersion Magnet School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,682 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
90
A
—
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level85%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,624 reporting
Meets grade level69%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,624 reporting
Masters grade level43%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,624 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 reporting
Meets grade level71%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 reporting
Masters grade level47%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 reporting
Meets grade level69%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 reporting
Masters grade level38%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 reporting
Meets grade level67%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 reporting
Masters grade level50%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 reporting
Meets grade level41%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 reporting
Masters grade level21%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,682 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
676
Economically disadvantaged
49.3%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
53.3%+40.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.2%−12.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.3%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.6%−6.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Arabic Immersion Magnet School
African American 14.8%
Hispanic 13.5%
White 56.8%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 11.1%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,682 reporting for every category shown · 1,682 in full cohort
African American 9.5%
Hispanic 40.3%
White 42.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,431 reporting for every category shown · 4,431 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 54%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
676
Economically disadvantaged students
333
Emergent bilingual students
360
Special education students
42
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
64
Students in TEA mobility denominator
485
TEA-published mobility rate
13.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 676 students in 2025–26, an increase of 67 (11.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
676
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+67
Increase · +11.0%
Change since 2021–22
+199
Increase · +41.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
676
Selected comparison
650.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,645 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Arabic Immersion Magnet School
School year
Students enrolledArabic Immersion Magnet School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
477
First available year
651.6
2022–23
538
Increase of 61 (12.8%)
656.5
2023–24
611
Increase of 73 (13.6%)
656.2
2024–25
609
Decrease of 2 (0.3%)
652.7
2025–26
676
Increase of 67 (11.0%)
650.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
652
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Arabic Immersion Magnet School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
496
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
486
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
553
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
628
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
652
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Arabic Immersion Magnet School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Arabic Immersion Magnet School
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,644
Selected comparison
$12,005
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting
−$3,361 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,644 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Arabic Immersion Magnet School
Parent district: Houston ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,102
$14,470
$13,054
$7,856
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,528 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,896
$13,643
$13,108
$8,041
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,547 rated schools reporting
2020
$10,669
$13,627
$14,058
$8,536
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,412
$13,515
$14,797
$8,934
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,577 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,644
$14,985
$15,708
$10,257
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,588 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,192
$16,350
$16,792
$10,717
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,607 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,665
$18,150
$18,125
$11,549
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,626 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,644
$17,026
$18,972
$12,005
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,182+$225 vs similar economic context
Teachers
24−18.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
27.9+7.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Arabic Immersion Magnet School
Beginning 20.7%
1 to 5 years 31%
6 to 10 years 24.4%
11 to 20 years 16.5%
21 to 30 years 7.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,682 reporting for every category shown · 1,682 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24.2%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29.6%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,431 reporting for every category shown · 4,431 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Arabic Immersion Magnet School in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classArabic Immersion Magnet School · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.1
18
Grade 1
18.6
18.4
Grade 2
11
18.5
Grade 3
20.6
19
Grade 4
19.3
19
Grade 5
19.6
20
Grade 6
16.8
17.7
Secondary English
15
15.1
Secondary languages other than English
13.9
17.4
Secondary math
14.8
16
Secondary science
19.7
17.5
Secondary social studies
19.7
17.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
7 measures
48of 1,624
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,624 that report this measure · tied with 4
55of 1,504
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,504 that report this measure · tied with 10
62of 1,622
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,622 that report this measure · tied with 13
70of 1,590
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,590 that report this measure · tied with 25
76of 1,616
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,616 that report this measure · tied with 7
83of 1,633
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,633 that report this measure · tied with 20
86of 1,616
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,616 that report this measure · tied with 10
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912478.