Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Arabic Immersion Magnet School

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 676 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,682 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
145 of 1,682tied with 66 others
A92

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,682 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
69%vs 53.6% avg · +15.4 pts
Masters
43%vs 23.4% avg · +19.6 pts

Among 1,624 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
69%vs 47.3% avg · +21.7 pts
Masters
38%vs 19.3% avg · +18.7 pts

Among 1,616 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
71%vs 58.6% avg · +12.4 pts
Masters
47%vs 25.2% avg · +21.8 pts

Among 1,622 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Arabic Immersion Magnet School is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,682 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 145th of 1,682 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageArabic Immersion Magnet School 9386929292 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9282.2 1,682 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9282.4 1,655 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9280.5 1,628 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8681.0 1,608 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9383.6 1,586 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+10.1 vs similar economic context · 1,624 reporting
  • School Progress91 A+9.4 vs similar economic context · 1,619 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,605 reporting
  • Academic Growth90 A+14.1 vs similar economic context · 1,590 reporting
  • Relative Performance91 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,619 reporting
  • Arabic Immersion Magnet School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,682 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress91A—
Closing the Gaps92A—
Academic Growth90A—
Relative Performance91A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,624 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,624 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,624 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 reporting
  • Masters grade level47%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,504 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 839 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,682 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
676
Economically disadvantaged
49.3%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
53.3%+40.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.2%−12.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.3%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.6%−6.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Arabic Immersion Magnet School

African American: 14.8%Hispanic: 13.5%White: 56.8%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 11.1%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 14.8%
  • Hispanic 13.5%
  • White 56.8%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 11.1%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,682 reporting for every category shown · 1,682 in full cohort

African American: 9.5%Hispanic: 40.3%White: 42.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.5%
  • Hispanic 40.3%
  • White 42.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
676
Economically disadvantaged students
333
Emergent bilingual students
360
Special education students
42

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
64
Students in TEA mobility denominator
485
TEA-published mobility rate
13.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 676 students in 2025–26, an increase of 67 (11.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
676

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+67

Increase · +11.0%

Change since 2021–22
+199

Increase · +41.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
676
Selected comparison
650.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,645 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Arabic Immersion Magnet School
School yearStudents enrolledArabic Immersion Magnet SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 477 First available year 651.6
2022–23 538 Increase of 61 (12.8%) 656.5
2023–24 611 Increase of 73 (13.6%) 656.2
2024–25 609 Decrease of 2 (0.3%) 652.7
2025–26 676 Increase of 67 (11.0%) 650.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
652

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Arabic Immersion Magnet School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 496 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 486 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 553 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 628 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 652 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Arabic Immersion Magnet School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Arabic Immersion Magnet School
  • Parent district: Houston ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,644
Selected comparison
$12,005

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting

−$3,361 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,644 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearArabic Immersion Magnet SchoolParent district: Houston ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,102$14,470$13,054$7,856 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,528 rated schools reporting
2019$6,896$13,643$13,108$8,041 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,547 rated schools reporting
2020$10,669$13,627$14,058$8,536 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 rated schools reporting
2021$6,412$13,515$14,797$8,934 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,577 rated schools reporting
2022$6,644$14,985$15,708$10,257 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,588 rated schools reporting
2023$7,192$16,350$16,792$10,717 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,607 rated schools reporting
2024$7,665$18,150$18,125$11,549 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,626 rated schools reporting
2025$8,644$17,026$18,972$12,005 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,182+$225 vs similar economic context
Teachers
24−18.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
27.9+7.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Arabic Immersion Magnet School

Beginning: 20.7%1 to 5 years: 31%6 to 10 years: 24.4%11 to 20 years: 16.5%21 to 30 years: 7.4%
  • Beginning 20.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 31%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 7.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,682 reporting for every category shown · 1,682 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.6%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Arabic Immersion Magnet School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classArabic Immersion Magnet School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.118
Grade 118.618.4
Grade 21118.5
Grade 320.619
Grade 419.319
Grade 519.620
Grade 616.817.7
Secondary English1515.1
Secondary languages other than English13.917.4
Secondary math14.816
Secondary science19.717.5
Secondary social studies19.717.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

7 measures

  • 48of 1,624

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,624 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 55of 1,504

    Science — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,504 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 62of 1,622

    Reading — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,622 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 70of 1,590

    Academic Growth

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,590 that report this measure · tied with 25

  • 76of 1,616

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,616 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 83of 1,633

    Attendance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,633 that report this measure · tied with 20

  • 86of 1,616

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,616 that report this measure · tied with 10

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912478.