Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Anita Scott Elem

Rockwall County · Region 10: Richardson · 554 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
71/1002025-26
Change
−21 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−10.2 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,815 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,559 of 1,815tied with 45 others
C71

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.2 average for 1,815 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

10.1% −5 pts vs 15.1%

  • 10.1% is 5 percentage points lower than the 15.1% average among 1,759 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Anita Scott Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.2 average for 1,815 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 21 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,559th of 1,815 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 45 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Additional Targeted Support

Official support label: ATS Flagged but not Improved

Identification reason: White

TEA track year 2 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
22.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
1.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAnita Scott Elem 9278797171 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7181.2 1,815 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7181.3 1,790 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7979.2 1,764 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7879.9 1,735 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9282.8 1,708 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C−8.5 vs similar economic context · 1,746 reporting
  • School Progress69 D−12.3 vs similar economic context · 1,739 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps70 C−8.4 vs similar economic context · 1,723 reporting
  • Academic Growth58 F−16.9 vs similar economic context · 1,695 reporting
  • Relative Performance69 D−10.3 vs similar economic context · 1,739 reporting
  • Anita Scott Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,815 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress69D1
Closing the Gaps70C10
Academic Growth58F2
Relative Performance69D1

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 8 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (72), so School Progress (69) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 72.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level71%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level54%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,815 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
554
Economically disadvantaged
54.9%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
24.7%+10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.0%+5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.1%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Anita Scott Elem

African American: 20.4%Hispanic: 37.4%White: 33.6%American Indian: 1.1%Asian: 2.7%Two or More Races: 4.9%
  • African American 20.4%
  • Hispanic 37.4%
  • White 33.6%
  • American Indian 1.1%
  • Asian 2.7%
  • Two or More Races 4.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting for every category shown · 1,815 in full cohort

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 44.1%White: 38.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 44.1%
  • White 38.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
554
Economically disadvantaged students
304
Emergent bilingual students
137
Special education students
133

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
73
Students in TEA mobility denominator
495
TEA-published mobility rate
14.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 554 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (1.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
554

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+6

Increase · +1.1%

Change since 2021–22
−99

Decrease · −15.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
554
Selected comparison
633.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Anita Scott Elem
School yearStudents enrolledAnita Scott ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 653 First available year 635.4
2022–23 712 Increase of 59 (9.0%) 641.6
2023–24 785 Increase of 73 (10.3%) 641
2024–25 548 Decrease of 237 (30.2%) 638.1
2025–26 554 Increase of 6 (1.1%) 633.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
22

3.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
38

6.46 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
588

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
3.7%
Selected comparison
12.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 rated schools reporting

−8.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
6.46
Selected comparison
28

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,510 rated schools reporting

−21.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Anita Scott Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 620 32 5.2% 61 9.84 9.8% 19
2021–22 734 36 4.9% 86 11.72 12.4% 28.1
2022–23 788 37 4.7% 65 8.25 12.9% 29.7
2023–24 856 34 4.0% 61 7.13 12.8% 29.7
2024–25 588 22 3.7% 38 6.46 12.5% 28
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Anita Scott Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 22 3.7% 38 6.46 12.5% 28
In-school suspensions 15 2.5% 18 3.06 11.2% 21.7
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — 17 2.89 — 9
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$23k$39k20182020202220242025
  • Anita Scott Elem
  • Parent district: Royse City ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,238
Selected comparison
$12,317

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,787 rated schools reporting

−$1,079 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,238 per student for this campus, $37,302 per student for its parent district, Royse City ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAnita Scott ElemParent district: Royse City ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,527$11,015$13,054$7,904 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 rated schools reporting
2019$7,600$16,048$13,108$8,078 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
2020$7,933$15,556$14,058$8,646 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,679 rated schools reporting
2021$7,201$11,759$14,797$9,024 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,695 rated schools reporting
2022$8,932$20,966$15,708$10,389 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,710 rated schools reporting
2023$8,577$24,225$16,792$10,899 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 rated schools reporting
2024$9,778$29,374$18,125$11,780 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,761 rated schools reporting
2025$11,238$37,302$18,972$12,317 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,787 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,046−$515 vs similar economic context
Teachers
46+3.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.2−7.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Anita Scott Elem

Beginning: 12.3%1 to 5 years: 30.8%6 to 10 years: 13%11 to 20 years: 28.6%21 to 30 years: 8.8%Over 30 years: 6.6%
  • Beginning 12.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 30.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 13%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 8.8%
  • Over 30 years 6.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting for every category shown · 1,815 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.8%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.8%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Anita Scott Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAnita Scott Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten18.818
Grade 117.518.3
Grade 217.318.5
Grade 317.518.8
Grade 41819
Grade 523.319.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 199902104.