Traditional public school campus
Anita Reeves Elem
Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 498 students
- Current score
- 71/1002025-26
- Score vs similar economic context
- −9.8 ptsvs 80.8 average · 1,943 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,626 of 1,943tied with 48 others
- Score vs region
- −9.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
- Region 11: Fort Worth placement
- 678 of 839tied with 17 others
- Score vs county
- −9.0 ptsvs 80 average · 179 rated schools in Denton County
- Denton County placement
- 145 of 179tied with 4 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- −9.1 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,689 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 3,729 of 4,689tied with 83 others
- Score vs state
- −10.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 6,354 of 7,646tied with 116 others
At a glance
The current score is below the 80.8 average for 1,943 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is below the 80 average for 179 rated schools in Denton County.The current score is below the 80.1 average for 4,689 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Read the full rating context and placement
Anita Reeves Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.8 average for 1,943 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 1,626th of 1,943 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 48 others).
Anita Reeves Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 678th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 17 others).
Anita Reeves Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80 average for 179 rated schools in Denton County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 145th of 179 rated schools in Denton County (tied with 4 others).
Anita Reeves Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.1 average for 4,689 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 3,729th of 4,689 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 83 others).
Anita Reeves Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 6,354th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 116 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
1 year of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 71 | 80.8 1,943 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Anita Reeves Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,943 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 71 | C | 9 |
| School Progress | 68 | D | 2 |
| Closing the Gaps | 71 | C | 9 |
| Academic Growth | 68 | D | 2 |
| Relative Performance | 67 | D | 3 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 9 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (71), so School Progress (68) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 71.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,943 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 498
- Economically disadvantaged
- 59.6%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 15.4%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 19.8%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- —
- Chronically absent
- —
Student demographics
Anita Reeves Elem
- African American 24.6%
- Hispanic 29.7%
- White 29.9%
- Asian 5.9%
- Two or More Races 9.9%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,943 reporting for every category shown · 1,943 in full cohort
- African American 10.3%
- Hispanic 47.7%
- White 35.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
- African American 15.4%
- Hispanic 39.6%
- White 34.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison average For Denton County · 179 reporting for every category shown · 179 in full cohort
- African American 13.9%
- Hispanic 33.2%
- White 36.5%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 10.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,689 reporting for every category shown · 4,689 in full cohort
- African American 12.1%
- Hispanic 55%
- White 25%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 495
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 295
- Emergent bilingual students
- 76
- Special education students
- 98
TEA context labels
- New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- Not reported
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- Not reported
- TEA-published mobility rate
- Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $63,094−$3,402 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 35−7.0 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 14.2−5.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Anita Reeves Elem
- 1 to 5 years 33.6%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 32.2%
- 21 to 30 years 14.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,943 reporting for every category shown · 1,943 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.9%
- 1 to 5 years 25.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.4%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24%
- 6 to 10 years 20.6%
- 11 to 20 years 30%
- 21 to 30 years 16.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Denton County · 179 reporting for every category shown · 179 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.6%
- 1 to 5 years 25.7%
- 6 to 10 years 21.2%
- 11 to 20 years 29.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.8%
- Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,689 reporting for every category shown · 4,689 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26.2%
- 6 to 10 years 19.5%
- 11 to 20 years 28.9%
- 21 to 30 years 15.8%
- Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061901132.