Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Alternative School

Chambers County · Region 04: Houston · 27 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Alternative School for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Alternative School for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—81.2 1,852 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—81.2 1,827 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—79.2 1,799 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—79.9 1,767 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—82.8 1,739 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 80.3 · 1,781 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 81.3 · 1,773 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 78.4 · 1,757 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 74.8 · 1,726 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.4 · 1,773 reporting
  • Alternative School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,852 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 76.2% · 1,781 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 51.1% · 1,781 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 21.5% · 1,781 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 73.5% · 1,768 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 44.7% · 1,768 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 17.7% · 1,768 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,852 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
27
Economically disadvantaged
55.6%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.8%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.2%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
90.0%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
32.1%+16.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Alternative School

African American: 11.1%Hispanic: 51.9%White: 37%
  • African American 11.1%
  • Hispanic 51.9%
  • White 37%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting for every category shown · 1,852 in full cohort

African American: 10%Hispanic: 44.8%White: 38.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 10%
  • Hispanic 44.8%
  • White 38.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
27
Economically disadvantaged students
15
Emergent bilingual students
4
Special education students
6

TEA context labels

  • Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP)

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
140
Students in TEA mobility denominator
140
TEA-published mobility rate
100%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 27 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 2 (6.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
27

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−2

Decrease · −6.9%

Change since 2022–23
−3

Decrease · −10.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
27
Selected comparison
635.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,813 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Alternative School
School yearStudents enrolledAlternative SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 Not reported Not available —
2022–23 30 No adjacent prior year 646.5
2023–24 13 Decrease of 17 (56.7%) 644.8
2024–25 29 Increase of 16 (123.1%) 641.2
2025–26 27 Decrease of 2 (6.9%) 635.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
14

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
14

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
Not reported

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Alternative School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 Not reported Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 Not reported 21 — 26 — — —
2022–23 Not reported 13 — 15 — — —
2023–24 Not reported 14 — 14 — — —
2024–25 Not reported 14 — 14 — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Alternative School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 14 — 14 — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements 14 — 14 — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$41k$75k20182020202220242025
  • Alternative School
  • Parent district: Barbers Hill ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$24,633
Selected comparison
$12,283

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,824 rated schools reporting

+$12,350 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $24,633 per student for this campus, $27,785 per student for its parent district, Barbers Hill ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAlternative SchoolParent district: Barbers Hill ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$27,213$27,600$13,054$7,928 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,675 rated schools reporting
2019$66,295$26,415$13,108$8,096 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 rated schools reporting
2020$36,782$22,568$14,058$8,673 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,708 rated schools reporting
2021$41,836$33,288$14,797$9,047 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 rated schools reporting
2022$19,711$34,784$15,708$10,455 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,741 rated schools reporting
2023$23,602$24,488$16,792$10,916 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,767 rated schools reporting
2024$71,244$26,612$18,125$11,750 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,796 rated schools reporting
2025$24,633$27,785$18,972$12,283 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,824 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$87,242+$20,696 vs similar economic context
Teachers
47+5.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
0.6−18.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Alternative School

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 6.8%6 to 10 years: 21.8%11 to 20 years: 36.4%21 to 30 years: 28%Over 30 years: 2.5%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 6.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 36.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 28%
  • Over 30 years 2.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,852 reporting for every category shown · 1,852 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.8%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 28.7%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 036902005.