Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Alternative Center

Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 14 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Alternative Center for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

5.6% −17.5 pts vs 23.1%

  • 5.6% is 17.5 percentage points lower than the 23.1% average among 1,936 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

97.7% +4.7 pts vs 93%

  • 97.7% is 4.7 percentage points above the 93% average among 1,942 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Alternative Center for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Who this school serves
  5. Student counts behind the percentages
  6. Discipline and removal from class
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—77.6 2,054 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—77.3 2,036 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—73.8 2,018 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—73.3 2,012 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—81.8 1,987 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 70.3 · 1,905 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.8 · 1,902 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 74.9 · 1,891 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.1 · 1,875 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 76.7 · 1,901 reporting
  • Alternative Center
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,054 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
14
Economically disadvantaged
92.9%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−41.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.4%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.7%+4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.6%−17.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Alternative Center

Hispanic: 100%
  • Hispanic 100%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,054 reporting for every category shown · 2,054 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 76.4%White: 5.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.6%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 76.4%
  • White 5.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
14
Economically disadvantaged students
13
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
3

TEA context labels

  • Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP)

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
169
Students in TEA mobility denominator
169
TEA-published mobility rate
100%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
Not reported

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Alternative Center
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23 Not reported Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 Not reported Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 Not reported Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Alternative Center in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$24k$41k2018202020232025
  • Alternative Center
  • Parent district: Edgewood ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$21,120
Selected comparison
$13,266

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 rated schools reporting

+$7,854 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $21,120 per student for this campus, $16,543 per student for its parent district, Edgewood ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAlternative CenterParent district: Edgewood ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$30,625$13,375$13,054$8,322 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,939 rated schools reporting
2019$32,901$11,711$13,108$8,339 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,964 rated schools reporting
2020$39,460$13,031$14,058$8,840 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,968 rated schools reporting
2022$16,611$16,139$15,708$11,241 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting
2023$38,172$19,076$16,792$11,763 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 rated schools reporting
2024$21,058$18,570$18,125$12,692 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,021 rated schools reporting
2025$21,120$16,543$18,972$13,266 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$66,207−$2,120 vs similar economic context
Teachers
4−36.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
3.5−11.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Alternative Center

1 to 5 years: 75%21 to 30 years: 25%
  • 1 to 5 years 75%
  • 21 to 30 years 25%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,054 reporting for every category shown · 2,054 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.5%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 18.8%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.8%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015905042.