Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Almeta Crawford HS

Fort Bend County · Region 04: Houston · 1,437 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
80/1002025-26
Change
+10 ptssince 2023-24
Score vs similar economic context
−0.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 1,974 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,045 of 1,974tied with 82 others
B80

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is level with the 80.4 average for 1,974 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 7 points

72 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 79 is 4.8 points above the 74.2 average among 1,820 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

81 +3.4 pts vs 77.6

  • 81 is 3.4 points above the 77.6 average among 1,858 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Almeta Crawford HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.4 average for 1,974 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 10 points since 2023-24.

Ranks 1,045th of 1,974 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 3 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

3 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAlmeta Crawford HS 707580 2023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8080.4 1,974 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7580.2 1,949 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7078.2 1,929 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement75 C−3.6 vs similar economic context · 1,883 reporting
  • School Progress79 C−2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps81 B+3.4 vs similar economic context · 1,858 reporting
  • Academic Growth79 C+4.8 vs similar economic context · 1,820 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C−0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
  • Almeta Crawford HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,974 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement75C5
School Progress79C1
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth79C1
Relative Performance79C1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (79), so Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 79.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level79%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,883 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,883 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,883 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,974 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−93.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 477 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−93.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 473 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 474 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.7%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 480 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%60.0%−60.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%28.2%−28.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%10.9%−10.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%33.6%−33.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%38.2%−38.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.6%−1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.7%−6.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.6%−3.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.2%−3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%7.9%−7.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.4%−3.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 515 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,437
Economically disadvantaged
62.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.6%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.8%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.6%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Almeta Crawford HS

African American: 54.3%Hispanic: 30.8%White: 4.2%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 7%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 54.3%
  • Hispanic 30.8%
  • White 4.2%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 reporting for every category shown · 1,974 in full cohort

African American: 10.7%Hispanic: 49.7%White: 33.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 10.7%
  • Hispanic 49.7%
  • White 33.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,437
Economically disadvantaged students
893
Emergent bilingual students
195
Special education students
227

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
165
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,135
TEA-published mobility rate
14.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,437 students in 2025–26, an increase of 409 (39.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,437

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+409

Increase · +39.8%

Change since 2023–24
+814

Increase · +130.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,437
Selected comparison
623.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Almeta Crawford HS
School yearStudents enrolledAlmeta Crawford HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2023–24 623 First available year 637.2
2024–25 1,028 Increase of 405 (65.0%) 634.1
2025–26 1,437 Increase of 409 (39.8%) 623.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
195

17.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
448

40.14 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,116

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
17.5%
Selected comparison
12.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,503 rated schools reporting

+4.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
40.14
Selected comparison
29.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,628 rated schools reporting

+10.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Almeta Crawford HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24 679 120 17.7% 282 41.53 13.1% 31.1
2024–25 1,116 195 17.5% 448 40.14 12.8% 29.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Almeta Crawford HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 195 17.5% 448 40.14 12.8% 29.5
In-school suspensions 131 11.7% 177 15.86 11.5% 22.7
Out-of-school suspensions 126 11.3% 175 15.68 6.9% 10.1
DAEP placements 57 5.1% 66 5.91 5.0% 5.9
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$10k$22k$34k20242025
  • Almeta Crawford HS
  • Parent district: Fort Bend ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,880
Selected comparison
$12,503

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 rated schools reporting

+$377 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,880 per student for this campus, $18,181 per student for its parent district, Fort Bend ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAlmeta Crawford HSParent district: Fort Bend ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2024$32,111$14,142$18,125$11,963 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting
2025$12,880$18,181$18,972$12,503 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,712+$3,347 vs similar economic context
Teachers
90+47.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16−3.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Almeta Crawford HS

Beginning: 6.1%1 to 5 years: 24.7%6 to 10 years: 31.9%11 to 20 years: 20.5%21 to 30 years: 14.5%Over 30 years: 2.3%
  • Beginning 6.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 31.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 20.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.5%
  • Over 30 years 2.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 reporting for every category shown · 1,974 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 25.8%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28.2%21 to 30 years: 16%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 16%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Almeta Crawford HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAlmeta Crawford HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English1915
Secondary languages other than English23.817.4
Secondary math17.615.8
Secondary science20.517.3
Secondary social studies2317.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 195 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 10of 21

    Dropout Rate (lowest is best)

    Fort Bend County (standard accountability only) · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 079907018.