+12.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,912 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
119 of 1,912tied with 35 others
Score vs region
+9.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso
Region 19: El Paso placement
11 of 207tied with 4 others
Score vs county
+8.9 ptsvs 84.1 average · 203 rated schools in El Paso County
El Paso County placement
10 of 203tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+12.0 ptsvs 81 average · 3,342 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
197 of 3,342tied with 114 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81 average for 1,912 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso.The current score is above the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County.The current score is above the 81 average for 3,342 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
73%vs 50.5% avg · +22.5 pts
Masters
41%vs 21% avg · +20 pts
Among 1,840 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Alicia R Chacon International is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 1,912 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 119th of 1,912 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 35 others).
Alicia R Chacon International is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 11th of 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso (tied with 4 others).
Alicia R Chacon International is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 203 rated schools in El Paso County (tied with 4 others).
Alicia R Chacon International is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 3,342 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 197th of 3,342 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 114 others).
Alicia R Chacon International is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+12.2 vs similar economic context · 1,840 reporting
School Progress92 A+10.7 vs similar economic context · 1,833 reporting
Closing the Gaps94 A+15.8 vs similar economic context · 1,816 reporting
Academic Growth83 B+8.4 vs similar economic context · 1,782 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,833 reporting
Alicia R Chacon International
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,912 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
94
A
—
Academic Growth
83
B
7
Relative Performance
92
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level92%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 reporting
Meets grade level73%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 reporting
Masters grade level41%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 reporting
Meets grade level74%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 reporting
Masters grade level46%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting
Meets grade level74%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting
Masters grade level37%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,689 reporting
Meets grade level70%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,689 reporting
Masters grade level44%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,689 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 941 reporting
Meets grade level72%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 941 reporting
Masters grade level27%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 941 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,912 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
868
Economically disadvantaged
57.5%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
47.9%+33.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
5.5%−13.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.5%−13.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Alicia R Chacon International
Hispanic 98.4%
White 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting for every category shown · 1,912 in full cohort
African American 10%
Hispanic 46.3%
White 36.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 91.2%
White 4.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
African American 2%
Hispanic 91.3%
White 4.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,342 reporting for every category shown · 3,342 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 52.7%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
868
Economically disadvantaged students
499
Emergent bilingual students
416
Special education students
48
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
12
Students in TEA mobility denominator
757
TEA-published mobility rate
1.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 868 students in 2025–26, an increase of 9 (1.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
868
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+9
Increase · +1.0%
Change since 2021–22
+55
Increase · +6.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
868
Selected comparison
628.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Alicia R Chacon International
School year
Students enrolledAlicia R Chacon International
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
813
First available year
635.5
2022–23
829
Increase of 16 (2.0%)
641.4
2023–24
824
Decrease of 5 (0.6%)
638.7
2024–25
859
Increase of 35 (4.2%)
634.8
2025–26
868
Increase of 9 (1.0%)
628.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
12
1.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
20
2.31 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
865
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
1.4%
Selected comparison
12.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,451 rated schools reporting
−11.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.31
Selected comparison
27.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,575 rated schools reporting
−25.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Alicia R Chacon International
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
819
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
823
Suppressed
—
16
1.94
—
27.9
2022–23
833
17
2.0%
31
3.72
12.9%
29.8
2023–24
828
19
2.3%
28
3.38
12.8%
29.7
2024–25
865
12
1.4%
20
2.31
12.4%
27.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Alicia R Chacon International in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
12
1.4%
20
2.31
12.4%
27.8
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
10
1.2%
10
1.16
6.4%
9.2
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Alicia R Chacon International
Parent district: Ysleta ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,968
Selected comparison
$12,406
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 rated schools reporting
−$3,438 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,968 per student for this campus, $16,357 per student for its parent district, Ysleta ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Alicia R Chacon International
Parent district: Ysleta ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,780
$15,777
$13,054
$7,959
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,164
$14,422
$13,108
$8,127
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,754 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,643
$13,296
$14,058
$8,713
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,641
$15,128
$14,797
$9,088
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,785 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,266
$19,206
$15,708
$10,511
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 rated schools reporting
2023
$13,766
$20,106
$16,792
$11,057
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,248
$17,973
$18,125
$11,848
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,968
$16,357
$18,972
$12,406
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$68,607+$2,087 vs similar economic context
Teachers
56+14.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.5−3.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Alicia R Chacon International
1 to 5 years 16.1%
6 to 10 years 10.2%
11 to 20 years 48.6%
21 to 30 years 23.2%
Over 30 years 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 reporting for every category shown · 1,912 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 25.1%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.6%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 18.9%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34%
21 to 30 years 21.5%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
Beginning 3.9%
1 to 5 years 18.8%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34.4%
21 to 30 years 21.7%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,342 reporting for every category shown · 3,342 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.8%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Alicia R Chacon International in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classAlicia R Chacon International · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
21.2
17.9
Grade 1
20.8
18.2
Grade 2
19.8
18.4
Grade 3
20.6
18.7
Grade 4
49.1
18.9
Grade 6
21.1
17.4
Secondary English
21.1
14.8
Secondary languages other than English
22.4
17.2
Secondary math
21.1
15.6
Secondary science
21.1
17.1
Secondary social studies
21.1
17
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 203
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Region 19: El Paso · of the 203 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 203
Attendance
Region 19: El Paso · of the 203 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
10 measures
4of 200
Math — Meets
Region 19: El Paso · of the 200 that report this measure
5of 201
All Subjects — Masters
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 3
6of 200
Math — Approaches
Region 19: El Paso · of the 200 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 201
Reading — Masters
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 201
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 199
Closing the Gaps
Region 19: El Paso · of the 199 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 201
All Subjects — Meets
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 200
Math — Masters
Region 19: El Paso · of the 200 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 203
Overall score
El Paso County · of the 203 that report this measure · tied with 4
10of 197
Science — Masters
Region 19: El Paso · of the 197 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
87of 3,283
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 3,283 that report this measure · tied with 60
100of 1,837
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,837 that report this measure · tied with 13
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071905138.