Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Achieve Academy

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 122 students

Current score
97/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+15.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,856 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
18 of 1,856tied with 14 others
A97

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 99 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,856 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 8 points

89 to 97 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 97 is 15.7 points above the 81.3 average among 1,777 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

97 +15.8 pts vs 81.2

  • 97 is 15.8 points above the 81.2 average among 1,856 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

94 +13.7 pts vs 80.3

  • 94 is 13.7 points above the 80.3 average among 1,785 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Achieve Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,856 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 18th of 1,856 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 14 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAchieve Academy 9394959697 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 99 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9781.2 1,856 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9681.2 1,831 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9579.2 1,803 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9479.9 1,771 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9382.7 1,743 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+13.7 vs similar economic context · 1,785 reporting
  • School Progress97 A+15.7 vs similar economic context · 1,777 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 78.4 · 1,761 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 74.8 · 1,729 reporting
  • Relative Performance97 A+17.6 vs similar economic context · 1,777 reporting
  • Achieve Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,856 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress97A—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance97A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (97), so Student Achievement (94) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,785 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,785 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,785 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 73.5% · 1,772 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 44.7% · 1,772 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 17.7% · 1,772 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 77.4% · 1,633 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 49.9% · 1,633 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 23% · 1,633 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 930 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 930 reporting
  • Masters grade level31%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 930 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,856 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
94.1%+23.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
97.8%+21.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
99.0%+20.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−4.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
72.0%−15.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria72.0%87.8%−15.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 513 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course65.1%58.5%+6.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA12.8%28.3%−15.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)4.7%10.0%−5.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course1.2%34.0%−32.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification9.3%37.7%−28.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.6%−1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%5.3%−5.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.7%−3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness2.3%3.2%−0.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student5.8%7.6%−1.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces4.7%3.4%+1.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 516 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
82

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
13

15.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
63

76.8% of graduates

Not trackable
6

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
82
Selected comparison
222.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
13
Selected comparison
97.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
15.9%
Selected comparison
45.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting

−29.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
76.8%
Selected comparison
50.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting

+26.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
7.3%
Selected comparison
4.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting

+2.6 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. COLLIN CO COMM COLL DISTRICT (023614)10

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
122
Economically disadvantaged
55.7%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.9%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.2%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
84.4%−10.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
45.7%+30.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Achieve Academy

African American: 20.5%Hispanic: 36.9%White: 33.6%Asian: 4.1%Two or More Races: 4.9%
  • African American 20.5%
  • Hispanic 36.9%
  • White 33.6%
  • Asian 4.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 reporting for every category shown · 1,856 in full cohort

African American: 10%Hispanic: 44.9%White: 38%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 10%
  • Hispanic 44.9%
  • White 38%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
122
Economically disadvantaged students
68
Emergent bilingual students
17
Special education students
21

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
357
Students in TEA mobility denominator
392
TEA-published mobility rate
91.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
139

52.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
355

133.96 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
265

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
52.5%
Selected comparison
12.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,429 rated schools reporting

+40.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
133.96
Selected comparison
28

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,547 rated schools reporting

+106.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Achieve Academy
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 218 68 31.2% 132 60.55 9.7% 18.9
2021–22 285 117 41.0% 266 93.33 12.4% 28.2
2022–23 284 159 56.0% 330 116.20 12.9% 29.8
2023–24 260 157 60.4% 399 153.46 12.8% 29.9
2024–25 265 139 52.5% 355 133.96 12.5% 28
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Achieve Academy in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 139 52.5% 355 133.96 12.5% 28
In-school suspensions 83 31.3% 153 57.74 11.3% 21.8
Out-of-school suspensions 80 30.2% 167 63.02 6.4% 9.1
DAEP placements 24 9.1% 27 10.19 4.7% 5.6
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$27k20182020202220242025
  • Achieve Academy
  • Parent district: Wylie ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$22,320
Selected comparison
$12,282

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 rated schools reporting

+$10,038 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $22,320 per student for this campus, $18,992 per student for its parent district, Wylie ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAchieve AcademyParent district: Wylie ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$17,475$11,092$13,054$7,931 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,678 rated schools reporting
2019$14,872$11,302$13,108$8,096 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 rated schools reporting
2020$19,466$14,022$14,058$8,672 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,712 rated schools reporting
2021$23,273$19,093$14,797$9,048 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,728 rated schools reporting
2022$20,134$14,727$15,708$10,455 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,745 rated schools reporting
2023$21,276$13,514$16,792$10,913 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,771 rated schools reporting
2024$25,339$14,796$18,125$11,749 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 rated schools reporting
2025$22,320$18,992$18,972$12,282 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,653+$7,119 vs similar economic context
Teachers
15−27.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
8.2−11.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Achieve Academy

1 to 5 years: 20%6 to 10 years: 26.7%11 to 20 years: 17.3%21 to 30 years: 28.7%Over 30 years: 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 20%
  • 6 to 10 years 26.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 28.7%
  • Over 30 years 6.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 reporting for every category shown · 1,856 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 28.7%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Achieve Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAchieve Academy · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 5119.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 156 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 293

    School Progress

    Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 293

    Relative Performance

    Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 35

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Collin County · of the 35 that report this measure

  • 3of 307

    Overall score

    Collin County · of the 307 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 4of 15

    Four-Year Completion Rate

    Region 10: Richardson (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 4of 15

    Five-Year Completion Rate

    Region 10: Richardson (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 5of 59

    Six-Year Completion Rate

    Similar size (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 59 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

2 measures

  • 11of 296

    Per-student spending

    Collin County · of the 296 that report this measure

  • 66of 1,785

    Student Achievement

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,785 that report this measure · tied with 22

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043914004.