+7.7 ptsvs 90.3 average · 705 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
8 of 705tied with 6 others
Score vs region
+15.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
6 of 1,157tied with 13 others
Score vs county
+11.6 ptsvs 86.4 average · 307 rated schools in Collin County
Collin County placement
1 of 307tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+17.1 ptsvs 80.9 average · 1,674 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
7 of 1,674tied with 17 others
Score vs state
+16.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
35 of 7,646tied with 46 others
A98
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 90.3 average for 705 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County.The current score is above the 80.9 average for 1,674 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
90%vs 72.1% avg · +17.9 pts
Masters
47%vs 41.7% avg · +5.3 pts
Among 693 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Academy HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90.3 average for 705 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 8th of 705 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 6 others).
Academy HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 13 others).
Academy HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 307 rated schools in Collin County (tied with 1 other).
Academy HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.9 average for 1,674 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 1,674 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 17 others).
Academy HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement97 A+5.7 vs similar economic context · 693 reporting
School Progress94 A+7.5 vs similar economic context · 691 reporting
Closing the Gaps99 A+11.2 vs similar economic context · 689 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−14.5 vs similar economic context · 687 reporting
Relative Performance94 A+15.2 vs similar economic context · 691 reporting
Academy HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (705 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
97
A
—
School Progress
94
A
—
Closing the Gaps
99
A
—
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
94
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (97), so
School Progress (94) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level98%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 693 reporting
Meets grade level90%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 693 reporting
Masters grade level47%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 693 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 693 reporting
Meets grade level92%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 693 reporting
Masters grade level33%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 693 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 691 reporting
Meets grade level72%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 691 reporting
Masters grade level23%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 691 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 651 reporting
Meets grade level96%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 651 reporting
Masters grade level62%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 651 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 reporting
Meets grade level97%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 reporting
Masters grade level75%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 274 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (705 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+13.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+12.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+13.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 139 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
97.0%+8.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
97.0%
88.5%
+8.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
91.9%
67.9%
+24.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
85.5%
55.5%
+30.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
48.4%
33.3%
+15.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
0.0%
37.7%
−37.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
30.2%
−30.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.3%
−0.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
3.4%
−3.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
10.7%
−10.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
2.2%
−2.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
4.8%
5.8%
−1.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
2.0%
−2.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 134 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
76
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
29
38.2% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
33
43.4% of graduates
Not trackable
14
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
76
Selected comparison
405.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 115 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
29
Selected comparison
189.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 115 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
38.2%
Selected comparison
49.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 115 rated schools reporting
−11.4 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
43.4%
Selected comparison
40.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 115 rated schools reporting
+3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
18.4%
Selected comparison
10.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 115 rated schools reporting
+8.3 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
COLLIN CO COMM COLL DISTRICT (023614)12
U. OF TEXAS AT DALLAS (009741)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
230
Economically disadvantaged
16.5%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.9%−7.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.4%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.2%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Academy HS
African American 3.9%
Hispanic 21.7%
White 52.6%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 13%
Two or More Races 8.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 705 reporting for every category shown · 705 in full cohort
African American 6.9%
Hispanic 21.9%
White 48.1%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 17%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
African American 13.7%
Hispanic 22.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 26.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,674 reporting for every category shown · 1,674 in full cohort
African American 9.2%
Hispanic 49.4%
White 36.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
230
Economically disadvantaged students
38
Emergent bilingual students
9
Special education students
40
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
13
Students in TEA mobility denominator
280
TEA-published mobility rate
4.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 230 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 45 (16.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
230
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−45
Decrease · −16.4%
Change since 2021–22
−150
Decrease · −39.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
230
Selected comparison
861.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 701 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Academy HS
School year
Students enrolledAcademy HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
380
First available year
876.1
2022–23
350
Decrease of 30 (7.9%)
890.7
2023–24
298
Decrease of 52 (14.9%)
877.9
2024–25
275
Decrease of 23 (7.7%)
869.7
2025–26
230
Decrease of 45 (16.4%)
861.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
274
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Academy HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
418
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
380
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
347
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
298
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
274
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Academy HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Academy HS
Parent district: Plano ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$13,281
Selected comparison
$11,062
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 697 rated schools reporting
+$2,219 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $13,281 per student for this campus, $21,349 per student for its parent district, Plano ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Academy HS
Parent district: Plano ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,124
$14,443
$13,054
$7,355
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 604 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,978
$15,018
$13,108
$7,451
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 619 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,325
$14,436
$14,058
$7,763
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 632 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,751
$14,483
$14,797
$8,318
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 640 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,287
$15,185
$15,708
$9,584
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 651 rated schools reporting
2023
$11,234
$15,274
$16,792
$9,953
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 666 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,291
$17,470
$18,125
$10,891
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 682 rated schools reporting
2025
$13,281
$21,349
$18,972
$11,062
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 697 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Average salary
$70,787+$1,629 vs similar economic context
Teachers
23−32.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.2−4.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Academy HS
1 to 5 years 35%
6 to 10 years 30.1%
11 to 20 years 30.5%
21 to 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 705 reporting for every category shown · 705 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 23.2%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 32.5%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 29.2%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,674 reporting for every category shown · 1,674 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 24.2%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28.5%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
7 measures
1of 307
Overall score
Collin County · of the 307 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 293
Reading — Approaches
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure
1of 291
Closing the Gaps
Collin County · of the 291 that report this measure
1of 94
Social Studies — Approaches
Collin County · of the 94 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 94
Social Studies — Meets
Collin County · of the 94 that report this measure
1of 41
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Collin County (standard accountability only) · of the 41 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 35
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Collin County · of the 35 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
2of 293
Student Achievement
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 94
Social Studies — Masters
Collin County · of the 94 that report this measure
3of 293
Relative Performance
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 293
All Subjects — Approaches
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 275
Science — Meets
Collin County · of the 275 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 35
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Collin County · of the 35 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
4of 275
Science — Approaches
Collin County · of the 275 that report this measure · tied with 5
5of 293
All Subjects — Meets
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 293
Reading — Meets
Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 35
College, career or military ready
Collin County · of the 35 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
5 measures
15of 478
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar size · of the 478 that report this measure
27of 1,410
Science — Masters
Similar size · of the 1,410 that report this measure · tied with 5
35of 1,493
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 1,493 that report this measure · tied with 2
50of 1,106
School Progress
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 22
58of 1,106
Math — Approaches
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 19
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043910008.