+8.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,838 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
284 of 1,838tied with 72 others
Score vs region
+9.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
166 of 839tied with 26 others
Score vs county
+9.0 ptsvs 81 average · 63 rated schools in Johnson County
Johnson County placement
10 of 63tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+9.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 4,554 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
825 of 4,554tied with 199 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,838 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 81 average for 63 rated schools in Johnson County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 4,554 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
66%vs 51.1% avg · +14.9 pts
Masters
36%vs 21.6% avg · +14.4 pts
Among 1,768 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
A G Elder Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,838 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 284th of 1,838 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 72 others).
A G Elder Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 166th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 26 others).
A G Elder Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 63 rated schools in Johnson County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 63 rated schools in Johnson County (tied with 3 others).
A G Elder Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 4,554 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 825th of 4,554 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 199 others).
A G Elder Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,768 reporting
School Progress90 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,761 reporting
Closing the Gaps86 B+7.6 vs similar economic context · 1,745 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+10.1 vs similar economic context · 1,714 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,761 reporting
A G Elder Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,838 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
86
B
4
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
90
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so
School Progress (90) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level87%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 reporting
Meets grade level66%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 reporting
Masters grade level36%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,766 reporting
Meets grade level64%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,766 reporting
Masters grade level35%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,766 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,756 reporting
Meets grade level65%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,756 reporting
Masters grade level34%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,756 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 reporting
Meets grade level74%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 reporting
Masters grade level43%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,838 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
642
Economically disadvantaged
55.3%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.9%+11.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.5%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.3%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
A G Elder Elem
African American 2.5%
Hispanic 49.8%
White 44.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.2%
Pacific Islander 0.6%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting for every category shown · 1,838 in full cohort
African American 10%
Hispanic 44.6%
White 38.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Johnson County · 63 reporting for every category shown · 63 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 38.3%
White 49.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.7%
Pacific Islander 1.4%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,554 reporting for every category shown · 4,554 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.3%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
629
Economically disadvantaged students
348
Emergent bilingual students
163
Special education students
129
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
63
Students in TEA mobility denominator
547
TEA-published mobility rate
11.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 642 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 28 (4.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
642
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−28
Decrease · −4.2%
Change since 2021–22
+14
Increase · +2.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
642
Selected comparison
633.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,799 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for A G Elder Elem
School year
Students enrolledA G Elder Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
628
First available year
637.3
2022–23
620
Decrease of 8 (1.3%)
643.2
2023–24
670
Increase of 50 (8.1%)
641.6
2024–25
670
No change
638.6
2025–26
642
Decrease of 28 (4.2%)
633.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
15
2.13 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
703
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
2.13
Selected comparison
27.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 rated schools reporting
−25.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for A G Elder Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
603
12
2.0%
14
2.32
9.7%
18.8
2021–22
652
Suppressed
—
12
1.84
—
28.1
2022–23
663
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
722
10
1.4%
12
1.66
12.7%
29.6
2024–25
703
Suppressed
—
15
2.13
—
27.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for A G Elder Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
15
2.13
—
27.8
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
A G Elder Elem
Parent district: Joshua ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,307
Selected comparison
$12,267
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,810 rated schools reporting
−$1,960 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,307 per student for this campus, $17,209 per student for its parent district, Joshua ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
A G Elder Elem
Parent district: Joshua ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,713
$11,760
$13,054
$7,897
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,602
$11,516
$13,108
$8,081
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,679 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,421
$11,664
$14,058
$8,651
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,609
$12,467
$14,797
$9,033
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,712 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,118
$13,176
$15,708
$10,401
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,728 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,277
$13,736
$16,792
$10,867
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,753 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,815
$13,849
$18,125
$11,738
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,307
$17,209
$18,972
$12,267
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,810 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$73,716+$7,148 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−4.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17−2.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
A G Elder Elem
1 to 5 years 10%
6 to 10 years 34.9%
11 to 20 years 40%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 reporting for every category shown · 1,838 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Johnson County · 63 reporting for every category shown · 63 in full cohort
Beginning 4.2%
1 to 5 years 22.3%
6 to 10 years 22.1%
11 to 20 years 32.9%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,554 reporting for every category shown · 4,554 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for A G Elder Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classA G Elder Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16.3
18
Grade 1
20.3
18.2
Grade 2
16.6
18.4
Grade 3
19.9
18.8
Grade 4
21.8
19
Grade 5
21
19.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
10 measures
4of 61
All Subjects — Masters
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
4of 61
Math — Masters
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
5of 61
Math — Meets
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 52
Science — Masters
Johnson County · of the 52 that report this measure
7of 61
Student Achievement
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 61
Math — Approaches
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
8of 52
Science — Meets
Johnson County · of the 52 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 61
All Subjects — Approaches
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
9of 61
All Subjects — Meets
Johnson County · of the 61 that report this measure
9of 58
Academic Growth
Johnson County · of the 58 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 126905103.