Recent movement
Overall score rose 19 points
66 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureGeographic public school district
Texas Tech University K-12
Lubbock County · Region 17: Lubbock · 829 students
Official district websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
- Current score
- 85/1002025-26
- Change
- −8 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −4.7 ptsvs 89.7 average · 17 rated districts serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 15 of 17tied with 1 other
- Score vs region
- +0.3 ptsvs 84.7 average · 58 rated districts in Region 17: Lubbock
- Region 17: Lubbock placement
- 29 of 58tied with 2 others
- Score vs county
- +1.2 ptsvs 83.8 average · 9 rated districts in Lubbock County
- Score vs similar-size group
- +2.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 279 similarly sized rated districts
- Similar size placement
- 91 of 279tied with 14 others
- Score vs state
- +3.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,019 rated Texas districts
- Texas placement
- 350 of 1,019tied with 50 others
B85
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 98 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 89.7 average for 17 rated districts serving a similar economic context.The current score is level with the 84.7 average for 58 rated districts in Region 17: Lubbock.The current score is above the 83.8 average for 9 rated districts in Lubbock County.The current score is above the 82.1 average for 279 similarly sized rated districts.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 32 points
58 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Chronically absent
0% 1st-lowest of 17 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 19 points
66 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- Tied for 1st of 58 districts in Region 17: Lubbock reporting both years for one-year gain; 2 districts share that change.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 32 points
58 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 7.4 points above the 82.6 average among 57 districts in Region 17: Lubbock reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 57 districts in Region 17: Lubbock reporting both years for one-year gain.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 17: Lubbock average
0% −14.1 pts vs 14.1%
- 0% is 14.1 percentage points lower than the 14.1% average among 58 districts in Region 17: Lubbock reporting this measure.
- 1st-lowest of 58 districts in Region 17: Lubbock reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 19 points
66 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 32 points
58 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 19 points
66 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 2.9 points above the 82.1 average among 279 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 32 points
58 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 10.7 points above the 79.3 average among 279 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
0% −13.7 pts vs 13.7%
- 0% is 13.7 percentage points lower than the 13.7% average among 279 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
- Tied for 1st-lowest of 279 similarly sized districts reporting this measure; 2 districts share that value.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 19 points
66 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 3.3 points above the 81.7 average among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 32 points
58 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 10.9 points above the 79.1 average among 1,015 Texas districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
0% −15.1 pts vs 15.1%
- 0% is 15.1 percentage points lower than the 15.1% average among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
- Tied for 1st-lowest of 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure; 4 districts share that value.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.
Read the full rating context and placement
Texas Tech University K-12 is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 89.7 average for 17 rated districts serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 15th of 17 rated districts serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).
Texas Tech University K-12 is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 84.7 average for 58 rated districts in Region 17: Lubbock. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 29th of 58 rated districts in Region 17: Lubbock (tied with 2 others).
Texas Tech University K-12 is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.8 average for 9 rated districts in Lubbock County. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Texas Tech University K-12 is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 279 similarly sized rated districts. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 91st of 279 similarly sized rated districts (tied with 14 others).
Texas Tech University K-12 is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 350th of 1,019 rated Texas districts (tied with 50 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this district serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students crossing district lines
- Discipline and removal from class
- 1 schools in this district
- Teachers
- Where this district ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 98 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 85 | 89.7 17 reporting | 81.7 1,019 reporting |
| 2024-25 | D | 66 | 89.6 17 reporting | 80.3 1,019 reporting |
| 2023-24 | D | 67 | 87.8 17 reporting | 78.7 1,017 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 69 | 88.6 17 reporting | 79.2 1,018 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 93 | 90.5 17 reporting | 80.6 1,017 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Texas Tech University K-12
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (17 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 83 | B | 7 |
| School Progress | 73 | C | 7 |
| Closing the Gaps | 90 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 60 | D | 10 |
| Relative Performance | 73 | C | 7 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is Student Achievement (83), so School Progress (73) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (17 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 69.9%−27.2 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting
- Five-Year
- 0.0%−92.3 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting
- Six-Year
- 0.0%−92.4 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 1.2%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only districts in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported district rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 91.0%+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This district% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 91.0% | 87.8% | +3.2 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 85.8% | 72.4% | +13.4 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 38.8% | 64.2% | −25.4 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 14.9% | 45.0% | −30.1 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 11.2% | 37.9% | −26.7 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 5.2% | 19.5% | −14.3 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 0.3% | −0.3 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 0.2% | −0.2 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 2.2% | 10.0% | −7.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 1.8% | −1.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 3.0% | 5.4% | −2.4 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 1.5% | 1.4% | +0.1 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 14 rated districts reporting |
Every row is a share of this district's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this district minus the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported district percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where district graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 110
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 44
40.0% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 66
60.0% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 0
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This district
- 110
- Selected comparison
- 538.2
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This district
- 44
- Selected comparison
- 231.4
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This district
- 40.0%
- Selected comparison
- 47.1%
Not-found rate
- This district
- 60.0%
- Selected comparison
- 46.8%
Not-trackable rate
- This district
- 0.0%
- Selected comparison
- 6.0%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY (003644)7
- UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 829
- Economically disadvantaged
- 0.6%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 1.1%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 4.0%−9.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 100.0%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 0.0%−6.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Texas Tech University K-12
- African American 7.5%
- Hispanic 24.4%
- White 57.3%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 5.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.1%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 17 reporting for every category shown · 17 in full cohort
- African American 3.3%
- Hispanic 15.5%
- White 63%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 12.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 17: Lubbock · 58 reporting for every category shown · 58 in full cohort
- African American 2.1%
- Hispanic 57.7%
- White 38%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.4%
- Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison average For Lubbock County · 9 reporting for every category shown · 9 in full cohort
- African American 4.4%
- Hispanic 47.2%
- White 43.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 279 reporting for every category shown · 279 in full cohort
- African American 5%
- Hispanic 39.3%
- White 51.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 43.1%
- White 45.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 829
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 5
- Emergent bilingual students
- 9
- Special education students
- 33
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 829 students in 2025–26, an increase of 100 (13.7%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 829
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +100
Increase · +13.7%
- Change since 2021–22
- −148
Decrease · −15.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This district
- 829
- Selected comparison
- 6,472.4
| School year | Students enrolledTexas Tech University K-12 | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 977 | First available year | 5,739.4 |
| 2022–23 | 735 | Decrease of 242 (24.8%) | 5,980.4 |
| 2023–24 | 724 | Decrease of 11 (1.5%) | 6,196.6 |
| 2024–25 | 729 | Increase of 5 (0.7%) | 6,379.2 |
| 2025–26 | 829 | Increase of 100 (13.7%) | 6,472.4 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students crossing district lines
How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.
- Transfers in
- 829
Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26
- Transfers out
- Not reported
Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26
- Transfers in minus transfers out
- Not available
Arithmetic context only
Transfers in · 2025–26
- This district
- 829
- Selected comparison
- 394.9
| School year | Transfers inTexas Tech University K-12 | Transfers outTexas Tech University K-12 | In minus outTexas Tech University K-12 | Transfers inselected comparison average | Transfers outselected comparison average | In minus outselected comparison average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 977 | Not reported | Not available | 348.3 | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 735 | Suppressed | Not available | 333.2 | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 724 | Not reported | Not available | 328.4 | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 729 | Not reported | Not available | 369.3 | — | — |
| 2025–26 | 829 | Not reported | Not available | 394.9 | — | — |
Largest reported origins for transfers in
- Frisco ISD 04390522
- Cypress-Fairbanks ISD 10190718
- Lubbock ISD 15290118
- Fort Bend ISD 07990717
- Humble ISD 10191317
Top reported flows only. TEA published 20 of 256 counterpart counts and masked 236.
Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 1,195
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 1,148 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 1,262 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 1,218 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 1,195 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
1 schools in this district
Number of schools in the district
- This district
- 1
- Selected comparison
- 7.7
The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- K-12
- 1
Browse all 1 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Tech University K-12 | K-12 | B | 85 | 829 |
Teachers
Teacher turnover over time
| School year | Teacher turnover rateTexas Tech University K-12 | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | Not reported | — |
| 2022–23 | Not reported | — |
| 2023–24 | Not reported | — |
| 2024–25 | Not reported | — |
TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this district ranks best
Out of 156 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
-
1of 1,019
Attendance
Texas average · of the 1,019 that report this measure · tied with 1 · full ranking
-
1of 1,019
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Texas average · of the 1,019 that report this measure · tied with 3 · full ranking
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
-
2of 279
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 279 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
2of 58
Reading — Meets
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 58 that report this measure
-
3of 58
Reading — Masters
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 58 that report this measure
-
3of 14
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 14 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
10 measures
-
4of 14
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 14 that report this measure
-
5of 57
Social Studies — Approaches
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 57 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 14
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 14 that report this measure
-
6of 57
Social Studies — Masters
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 57 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 57
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 57 that report this measure
-
6of 14
College, career or military ready
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 58
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 58 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
7of 57
Social Studies — Meets
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 57 that report this measure
-
8of 16
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 58
All Subjects — Masters
Region 17: Lubbock · of the 58 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this district; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.