Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 6 points
65 to 71 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureGeographic public school district
Sierra Blanca ISD
Hudspeth County · Region 19: El Paso · 97 students
Official district websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
- Current score
- 78/1002025-26
- Change
- −1 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +0.3 ptsvs 77.7 average · 255 rated districts serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 122 of 255tied with 11 others
- Score vs region
- −3.1 ptsvs 81.1 average · 12 rated districts in Region 19: El Paso
- Region 19: El Paso placement
- 9 of 12tied with 1 other
- Score vs county
- −0.3 ptsvs 78.3 average · 3 rated districts in Hudspeth County
- Score vs similar-size group
- −2.2 ptsvs 80.2 average · 74 similarly sized rated districts
- Similar size placement
- 48 of 74tied with 2 others
- Score vs state
- −3.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,019 rated Texas districts
- Texas placement
- 685 of 1,019tied with 43 others
C78
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 77.7 average for 255 rated districts serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 81.1 average for 12 rated districts in Region 19: El Paso.The current score is level with the 78.3 average for 3 rated districts in Hudspeth County.The current score is below the 80.2 average for 74 similarly sized rated districts.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student above the similar-context average
45.5% +35.6 pts vs 9.9%
- 45.5% is 35.6 percentage points above the 9.9% average among 247 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 247 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
81 +5.8 pts vs 75.2
- 81 is 5.8 points above the 75.2 average among 255 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 6 points
65 to 71 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Four-Year Graduation Rate
100% Tied for 1st of 11 districts in Region 19: El Paso (standard accountability only) reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureTop placement
Five-Year Graduation Rate
100% Tied for 1st of 12 districts in Region 19: El Paso (standard accountability only) reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 3 share this value
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 6 points
65 to 71 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 6 points
65 to 71 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
45.5% 2nd of 57 similarly sized districts reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
10.3% −3.1 pts vs 13.4%
- 10.3% is 3.1 percentage points lower than the 13.4% average among 74 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 6 points
65 to 71 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student above the Texas average
45.5% +36.8 pts vs 8.7%
- 45.5% is 36.8 percentage points above the 8.7% average among 978 Texas districts reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 978 Texas districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Four-Year Graduation Rate above the Texas average
100% +3.9 pts vs 96.1%
- 100% is 3.9 percentage points above the 96.1% average among 975 Texas districts reporting this measure (standard accountability only).
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.
Read the full rating context and placement
Sierra Blanca ISD is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 77.7 average for 255 rated districts serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 122nd of 255 rated districts serving a similar economic context (tied with 11 others).
Sierra Blanca ISD is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.1 average for 12 rated districts in Region 19: El Paso. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 12 rated districts in Region 19: El Paso (tied with 1 other).
Sierra Blanca ISD is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 78.3 average for 3 rated districts in Hudspeth County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Sierra Blanca ISD is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.2 average for 74 similarly sized rated districts. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 48th of 74 similarly sized rated districts (tied with 2 others).
Sierra Blanca ISD is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 685th of 1,019 rated Texas districts (tied with 43 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this district serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students crossing district lines
- Discipline and removal from class
- Community around the district
- 1 schools in this district
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this district ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 78 | 77.7 255 reporting | 81.7 1,019 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 77 | 75.6 255 reporting | 80.3 1,019 reporting |
| 2023-24 | C | 76 | 73.9 255 reporting | 78.7 1,017 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 80 | 74.6 254 reporting | 79.2 1,018 reporting |
| 2021-22 | C | 79 | 77.1 254 reporting | 80.6 1,017 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Sierra Blanca ISD
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (255 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 81 | B | 9 |
| School Progress | 78 | C | 2 |
| Closing the Gaps | 71 | C | 9 |
| Academic Growth | 55 | F | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 78 | C | 2 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 9 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is Student Achievement (81), so School Progress (78) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (255 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 100.0%+5.0 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated districts reporting
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 rated districts reporting
- Six-Year
- 87.5%−7.7 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 rated districts reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only districts in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported district rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 100.0%+13.8 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This district% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 100.0% | 86.2% | +13.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 72.7% | 53.4% | +19.3 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 18.2% | 21.0% | −2.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 6.5% | −6.5 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 45.5% | 29.8% | +15.7 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 0.0% | 43.1% | −43.1 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 2.7% | −2.7 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 4.2% | −4.2 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 2.8% | −2.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 18.2% | 4.1% | +14.1 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 45.5% | 9.9% | +35.6 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 9.1% | 3.2% | +5.9 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 rated districts reporting |
Every row is a share of this district's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this district minus the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported district percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 97
- Economically disadvantaged
- 79.4%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 10.3%−9.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 23.7%+5.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.4%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 10.3%−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Sierra Blanca ISD
- African American 2.1%
- Hispanic 82.5%
- White 14.4%
- Two or More Races 1%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 reporting for every category shown · 255 in full cohort
- African American 10.3%
- Hispanic 62.1%
- White 23.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 19: El Paso · 12 reporting for every category shown · 12 in full cohort
- African American 1.1%
- Hispanic 91.5%
- White 6.1%
- American Indian 0.1%
- Asian 0.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 0.8%
Selected comparison average For Hudspeth County · 3 reporting for every category shown · 3 in full cohort
- African American 1.7%
- Hispanic 81.7%
- White 15.3%
- Asian 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 74 reporting for every category shown · 74 in full cohort
- African American 4.1%
- Hispanic 40.8%
- White 51.4%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 43.1%
- White 45.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 97
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 77
- Emergent bilingual students
- 10
- Special education students
- 23
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 97 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 3 (3.0%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 97
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −3
Decrease · −3.0%
- Change since 2021–22
- −21
Decrease · −17.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This district
- 97
- Selected comparison
- 7,094.4
| School year | Students enrolledSierra Blanca ISD | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 118 | First available year | 7,435.7 |
| 2022–23 | 116 | Decrease of 2 (1.7%) | 7,448.3 |
| 2023–24 | 99 | Decrease of 17 (14.7%) | 7,380.5 |
| 2024–25 | 100 | Increase of 1 (1.0%) | 7,324.8 |
| 2025–26 | 97 | Decrease of 3 (3.0%) | 7,094.4 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students crossing district lines
How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.
- Transfers in
- Suppressed
Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26
- Transfers out
- Not reported
Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26
- Transfers in minus transfers out
- Not available
Arithmetic context only
| School year | Transfers inSierra Blanca ISD | Transfers outSierra Blanca ISD | In minus outSierra Blanca ISD | Transfers inselected comparison average | Transfers outselected comparison average | In minus outselected comparison average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | Suppressed | Suppressed | Not available | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | Suppressed | Suppressed | Not available | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | Suppressed | Suppressed | Not available | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | Suppressed | Suppressed | Not available | — | — | — |
| 2025–26 | Suppressed | Not reported | Not available | — | — | — |
Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 13
11.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 13
11.50 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 113
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This district
- 11.5%
- Selected comparison
- 12.4%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This district
- 11.5
- Selected comparison
- 29.9
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 149 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 134 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 124 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 108 | 10 | 9.3% | 13 | 12.04 | 12.9% | 31.8 |
| 2024–25 | 113 | 13 | 11.5% | 13 | 11.50 | 12.4% | 29.9 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 13 | 11.5% | 13 | 11.50 | 12.4% | 29.9 |
| In-school suspensions | 13 | 11.5% | 13 | 11.50 | 10.2% | 20 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Community around the district
A district serves a place as well as a roster. These Census estimates describe the resident community without treating its circumstances as an explanation or a verdict on students.
- People living inside the district boundary
- 1,518
2024 Census estimate
- Children ages 5–17
- 48
Living inside the boundary
- Children ages 5–17 in families in poverty
- 14
29.2%
- School-age child poverty rate
- 29.2%
14 of 48
Boundary population
- This district
- 1,518
- Selected comparison
- 47,362.6
School-age population
- This district
- 48
- Selected comparison
- 8,571.5
School-age population in poverty
- This district
- 14
- Selected comparison
- 1,989.4
School-age child poverty rate
- This district
- 29.2%
- Selected comparison
- 23.0%
Population averages provide neutral scale context and can differ sharply across a region, county or the state. The poverty-rate comparison is the like-for-like percentage; none of these Census measures is treated as school performance.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2024 Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, fetched 24 August 2026. These are modeled estimates for residents inside the geographic district, not the students enrolled by the district. A family's poverty status is context, never a school-quality measure.
1 schools in this district
Number of schools in the district
- This district
- 1
- Selected comparison
- 11.8
The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- K-12
- 1
Browse all 1 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sierra Blanca School | K-12 | C | 78 | 97 |
Spending per student
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Sierra Blanca ISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This district
- $74,327
- Selected comparison
- $22,615
This district spends $43,230 more per student than TEA's peer group, and $55,355 more per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Sierra Blanca ISD | TEA peer group | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $21,177 | $22,035 | $13,054 | $14,166 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 rated districts reporting |
| 2019 | $22,462 | $21,900 | $13,108 | $14,359 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 rated districts reporting |
| 2020 | $22,129 | $21,220 | $14,058 | $15,502 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 rated districts reporting |
| 2021 | $25,446 | $22,787 | $14,797 | $16,910 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 rated districts reporting |
| 2022 | $37,167 | $28,874 | $15,708 | $18,786 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 rated districts reporting |
| 2023 | $35,114 | $35,111 | $16,792 | $21,170 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 rated districts reporting |
| 2024 | $59,433 | $33,004 | $18,125 | $21,326 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 rated districts reporting |
| 2025 | $74,327 | $31,097 | $18,972 | $22,615 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 rated districts reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $72,654+$8,439 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 12−465.5 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 8.2−5.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Sierra Blanca ISD
- 1 to 5 years 38.1%
- 6 to 10 years 31.4%
- 11 to 20 years 7.6%
- 21 to 30 years 15.3%
- Over 30 years 7.6%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 255 reporting for every category shown · 255 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.6%
- 6 to 10 years 17.6%
- 11 to 20 years 25.6%
- 21 to 30 years 16.4%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Selected comparison average For Region 19: El Paso · 12 reporting for every category shown · 12 in full cohort
- Beginning 10.6%
- 1 to 5 years 23.1%
- 6 to 10 years 19.5%
- 11 to 20 years 27.6%
- 21 to 30 years 17%
- Over 30 years 2.2%
Selected comparison average For Hudspeth County · 3 reporting for every category shown · 3 in full cohort
- Beginning 30.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.1%
- 11 to 20 years 10.2%
- 21 to 30 years 11.7%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 74 reporting for every category shown · 74 in full cohort
- Beginning 9.7%
- 1 to 5 years 24.7%
- 6 to 10 years 13.9%
- 11 to 20 years 25.5%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 8.5%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- Beginning 6.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 28.6% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
- This district
- 28.6%
- Selected comparison
- 23.3%
| School year | Teacher turnover rateSierra Blanca ISD | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 2.1% | 18.6% |
| 2021–22 | 12.6% | 22.0% |
| 2022–23 | 8.6% | 26.0% |
| 2023–24 | 7.7% | 23.6% |
| 2024–25 | 28.6% | 23.3% |
TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this district ranks best
Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
7 measures
-
1of 12
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Region 19: El Paso (standard accountability only) · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
1of 12
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
1of 12
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
1of 12
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
1of 12
Per-student spending
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
1of 11
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Region 19: El Paso (standard accountability only) · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 11
College, career or military ready
Region 19: El Paso · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
-
2of 12
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
2of 12
Attendance
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
2of 12
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
Student Achievement
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
-
5of 12
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
7of 12
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
9of 12
Overall score
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1 · full ranking
-
10of 12
Closing the Gaps
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure
-
10of 12
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 19: El Paso · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this district; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.