District · Traditional
S and S CISD
Grayson County · Region 10: Richardson · 923 students
S and S CISD is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 84.3 average of the 265 districts serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.7. It is down 4 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 87.
Ranks 852nd of 1,019 Texas districts (tied with 22 others), and 68th of 80 in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 1 other).
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
| Year | Rating | Score | Similar | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 74 | 84.3 | 81.7 |
| 2024-25 | C | 78 | 83.4 | 80.3 |
| 2023-24 | C | 76 | 81.5 | 78.7 |
| 2022-23 | C | 71 | 82.2 | 79.2 |
| 2021-22 | C | 78 | 82.8 | 80.6 |
How this district's change over time is ranked
TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where S and S CISD itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this district's own row.
Texas districts
Region 10: Richardson
Grayson County
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- S and S CISD
- Similar student population (265)
- Region 10: Richardson (80)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 79 | C | 1 |
| School Progress | 69 | D | 1 |
| Closing the Gaps | 61 | D | 9 |
| Academic Growth | 62 | D | 8 |
| Relative Performance | 69 | D | 1 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is Student Achievement (79), so School Progress (69) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 79.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar student population (265)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (265 districts) — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 94.3%−2.2 pts vs similar
- Five-Year
- 98.6%+1.6 pts vs similar
- Six-Year
- 93.7%−3.2 pts vs similar
- Dropout Rate
- 0.9%+0.6 pts vs similar
College, career and military readiness
| Criterion | This district | similar | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 98.0% | 89.9% | +8.1 |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 53.1% | 58.7% | −5.6 |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 32.8% | 32.6% | +0.2 |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 4.7% | 9.0% | −4.3 |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 35.9% | 38.8% | −2.9 |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 53.1% | 41.6% | +11.5 |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 1.4% | −1.4 |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 2.4% | −2.4 |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 4.4% | −4.4 |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 3.0% | −3.0 |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 10.9% | 8.2% | +2.7 |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 4.7% | 3.3% | +1.4 |
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 923
- Economically disadvantaged
- 41.6%−1.7 pts vs similar
- English learners
- 12.5%+4.7 pts vs similar
- Special education
- 21.9%+4.3 pts vs similar
- Attendance
- 95.1%±0.0 pts vs similar
- Chronically absent
- 10.6%−1.0 pts vs similar
Student demographics
- African American 2%
- Hispanic 26.1%
- White 66.2%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 0.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.9%
Spending per student
Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.
- S and S CISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
Spends $635 more per student than its peer group, and $3,138 more than the state average.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $70,819+$5,762 vs similar
- Teachers
- 79
- Students per staff member
- 11.8
Teaching experience
- Beginning 3.6%
- 1 to 5 years 18.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.2%
- 11 to 20 years 34.9%
- 21 to 30 years 19.2%
- Over 30 years 6.2%
Where this district ranks best
Out of 164 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
-
1of 13
College, career or military ready
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
3of 13
Earned an industry-based certification
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
4of 13
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
4of 13
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
4of 13
Attendance
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
4of 13
Average teacher salary
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
5of 13
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
7of 13
Science — Approaches
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 13
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Grayson County (standard accountability only) · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 13
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
8of 13
Science — Meets
Grayson County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
4 schools in this district
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S and S Cons HS | High School | B | 83 | 322 |
| S and S Cons MS | Middle / Jr. High | D | 66 | 260 |
| S and S Cons Elem | Elementary | D | 66 | 340 |
| Grayson County JJAEP | High School | Not Rated | — | 1 |
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.